Increasing Composite Restorations Sealants
SEALCOMP
Increasing Longevity of Composite Restorations With Defective Margins With Sealants. Controlled Clinical Trial 10 Years Follow-up
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A cohort of 20 patients aged 18 to 80 years (mean 28.35 years) of both genres females (65%) and males (35%) with 80 composite restorations were recruited at the Operative Dentistry Clinic at the Dental School of the University of Chile. All participants presented with marginal adaptation clinical features that deviated from the ideal and were rated Bravo according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria for the sealing group and no treatment group. As a positive control were considered composites with alpha values in marginal adaptation. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of the Dental School at the University of Chile (Project PRI-ODO-0207). All of the patients signed informed-consent forms and completed registration form. The selection criteria are summarized below.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2003
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2003
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 9, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2014
CompletedApril 21, 2014
April 1, 2014
Same day
April 9, 2014
April 16, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in quality of restorations
The quality of the restorations was scored according to the modified USPHS criteria. Two examiners underwent calibration exercises each year (JM and EF). Immediately after the treatment (baseline) and 10 years later, the examiners assessed the restorations independently by direct visual and tactile examination with mouth mirror number 5 and explorer number 23 (Hu Friedy Mfg. Co. Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and indirectly by radiographic examination (bite wing). The four parameters examined were anatomic form, secondary caries, marginal staining and marginal adaptation. If the difference was recorded between the two examiners, and if they could not reach an agreement, a third clinician, who also underwent the calibration exercises (GM), made the final decision.
1 year
Study Arms (3)
No treatment
NO INTERVENTIONThe composite resin restorations had marginal defects, but were clinically acceptable, did not receive treatment
Positive control
NO INTERVENTIONComposite resins with alpha value in marginal adaptation criteria
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALFor this group, defective areas were acid etched with 35% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds. A resin-based sealant (Clinpro Sealant, 3M ESPE) was applied over the defective area. The sealant was polymerized with a photocuring unit (Curing Light 2500, 3M ESPE) for 40 seconds. Rubber dam isolation was used for this procedure
Interventions
resin-based sealant (Clinpro Sealant, 3M ESPE)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with localized marginal deficiencies (Bravo Ryge Criterial) of composite restorations that were clinically judged to be suitable for sealing according to USPHS criteria.
- Patients with more than 20 teeth.
- Restorations in functional occlusions with an opposing natural tooth.
- Asymptomatic restored tooth.
- At least one proximal contact area with a neighbouring tooth.
- Patients are older than 18 years.
- Patients who agreed and signed a consent form for participating in the study.
- Area out of the restoration´s failure is in good condition.
- Composite resins with alpha value in adaptation marginal criterial
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with contra-indications for regular dental treatment based on their medical history.
- Patients with xerostomia or taking medication that significantly decreased salivary flow.
- Patients with a high risk of caries.
- Patients with psychiatric or physical diseases, which interfered with oral hygiene.
- Patients with localized marginal deficiencies \> 1 mm. and/or secondary caries adjacent to composite restorations , or major defects
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Chile
Santiago, Chile
Related Publications (5)
Moncada GC, Martin J, Fernandez E, Vildosola PG, Caamano C, Caro MJ, Mjor IA, Gordan VV. Alternative treatments for resin-based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12-month clinical trial. Gen Dent. 2006 Sep-Oct;54(5):314-8.
PMID: 17004564RESULTMoncada G, Fernandez E, Martin J, Arancibia C, Mjor IA, Gordan VV. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2008 May-Jun;33(3):258-64. doi: 10.2341/07-113.
PMID: 18505215RESULTMoncada G, Martin J, Fernandez E, Hempel MC, Mjor IA, Gordan VV. Sealing, refurbishment and repair of Class I and Class II defective restorations: a three-year clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 Apr;140(4):425-32. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0191.
PMID: 19339531RESULTFernandez EM, Martin JA, Angel PA, Mjor IA, Gordan VV, Moncada GA. Survival rate of sealed, refurbished and repaired defective restorations: 4-year follow-up. Braz Dent J. 2011;22(2):134-9. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402011000200008.
PMID: 21537587RESULTMartin J, Fernandez E, Estay J, Gordan VV, Mjor IA, Moncada G. Minimal invasive treatment for defective restorations: five-year results using sealants. Oper Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):125-33. doi: 10.2341/12-062C. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
PMID: 22788726RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eduardo Fernández, Prof.
University of Chile
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 9, 2014
First Posted
April 21, 2014
Study Start
May 1, 2003
Primary Completion
May 1, 2003
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
April 21, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-04