NCT02119195

Brief Summary

A cohort of 20 patients aged 18 to 80 years (mean 28.35 years) of both genres females (65%) and males (35%) with 80 composite restorations were recruited at the Operative Dentistry Clinic at the Dental School of the University of Chile. All participants presented with marginal adaptation clinical features that deviated from the ideal and were rated Bravo according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria for the sealing group and no treatment group. As a positive control were considered composites with alpha values in marginal adaptation. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of the Dental School at the University of Chile (Project PRI-ODO-0207). All of the patients signed informed-consent forms and completed registration form. The selection criteria are summarized below.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2003

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2003

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2003

Completed
10.6 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2013

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 9, 2014

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 21, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

April 21, 2014

Status Verified

April 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

April 9, 2014

Last Update Submit

April 16, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

compositesealantlongevity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in quality of restorations

    The quality of the restorations was scored according to the modified USPHS criteria. Two examiners underwent calibration exercises each year (JM and EF). Immediately after the treatment (baseline) and 10 years later, the examiners assessed the restorations independently by direct visual and tactile examination with mouth mirror number 5 and explorer number 23 (Hu Friedy Mfg. Co. Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and indirectly by radiographic examination (bite wing). The four parameters examined were anatomic form, secondary caries, marginal staining and marginal adaptation. If the difference was recorded between the two examiners, and if they could not reach an agreement, a third clinician, who also underwent the calibration exercises (GM), made the final decision.

    1 year

Study Arms (3)

No treatment

NO INTERVENTION

The composite resin restorations had marginal defects, but were clinically acceptable, did not receive treatment

Positive control

NO INTERVENTION

Composite resins with alpha value in marginal adaptation criteria

Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

For this group, defective areas were acid etched with 35% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds. A resin-based sealant (Clinpro Sealant, 3M ESPE) was applied over the defective area. The sealant was polymerized with a photocuring unit (Curing Light 2500, 3M ESPE) for 40 seconds. Rubber dam isolation was used for this procedure

Procedure: Sealant

Interventions

SealantPROCEDURE

resin-based sealant (Clinpro Sealant, 3M ESPE)

Also known as: Clinpro Sealant, Alpha seal, Prime Dent
Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with localized marginal deficiencies (Bravo Ryge Criterial) of composite restorations that were clinically judged to be suitable for sealing according to USPHS criteria.
  • Patients with more than 20 teeth.
  • Restorations in functional occlusions with an opposing natural tooth.
  • Asymptomatic restored tooth.
  • At least one proximal contact area with a neighbouring tooth.
  • Patients are older than 18 years.
  • Patients who agreed and signed a consent form for participating in the study.
  • Area out of the restoration´s failure is in good condition.
  • Composite resins with alpha value in adaptation marginal criterial

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with contra-indications for regular dental treatment based on their medical history.
  • Patients with xerostomia or taking medication that significantly decreased salivary flow.
  • Patients with a high risk of caries.
  • Patients with psychiatric or physical diseases, which interfered with oral hygiene.
  • Patients with localized marginal deficiencies \> 1 mm. and/or secondary caries adjacent to composite restorations , or major defects

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Chile

Santiago, Chile

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Moncada GC, Martin J, Fernandez E, Vildosola PG, Caamano C, Caro MJ, Mjor IA, Gordan VV. Alternative treatments for resin-based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12-month clinical trial. Gen Dent. 2006 Sep-Oct;54(5):314-8.

  • Moncada G, Fernandez E, Martin J, Arancibia C, Mjor IA, Gordan VV. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2008 May-Jun;33(3):258-64. doi: 10.2341/07-113.

  • Moncada G, Martin J, Fernandez E, Hempel MC, Mjor IA, Gordan VV. Sealing, refurbishment and repair of Class I and Class II defective restorations: a three-year clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 Apr;140(4):425-32. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0191.

  • Fernandez EM, Martin JA, Angel PA, Mjor IA, Gordan VV, Moncada GA. Survival rate of sealed, refurbished and repaired defective restorations: 4-year follow-up. Braz Dent J. 2011;22(2):134-9. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402011000200008.

  • Martin J, Fernandez E, Estay J, Gordan VV, Mjor IA, Moncada G. Minimal invasive treatment for defective restorations: five-year results using sealants. Oper Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):125-33. doi: 10.2341/12-062C. Epub 2012 Jul 11.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Clinpro Sealant

Study Officials

  • Eduardo Fernández, Prof.

    University of Chile

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prof.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2014

First Posted

April 21, 2014

Study Start

May 1, 2003

Primary Completion

May 1, 2003

Study Completion

December 1, 2013

Last Updated

April 21, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-04

Locations