The Influence of Endometrial Suturing on the Risk of Uterine Scar Defect
1 other identifier
interventional
130
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Caesarean section (CS) is the commonest major operation performed on women worldwide with progressively rising incidence. Consequently, long-term adverse sequelae due to uterine scar defect have been increasing. Given the association between uterine scar defect and gynecological symptoms, obstetric complications and potentially with subfertility, it is important to elucidate the etiology in order to develop preventive strategies. Surgical technique of uterine incision closure seems to be the most important determinant of defect formation. The aim of this prospective randomized study is to evaluate specifically the influence of inclusion versus exclusion of the endometrium during suturing the uterine incision on the risk to develop uterine scar defect.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 12, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 22, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2022
CompletedOctober 3, 2023
September 1, 2023
3.2 years
February 12, 2019
September 29, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of participants with uterine scar defect six month post cesarean section
Uterine scar defect with residual myometrium thickness of less then 2.5 mm
Until six month post cesarean section, and through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Spotting
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Abdominal pain
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Study Arms (2)
Endometrial suturing
EXPERIMENTALUterine incision repair including suturing of the endometrium
Non - Endometrial suturing
EXPERIMENTALUterine incision repair without suturing of the endometrium
Interventions
Suturing will include endometrium during cesarean incision repair
Suturing will not include endometrium during cesarean incision repair
All women will be invited six month post operation for vaginal sonographic evaluation of the uterine scar
All women will be invited six month post operation for filling questionnaire concerning possibility of uterine scar defect ( spotting, pelvic pain, fertility abnormalities )
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Term pregnancy (≥37 weeks of gestation)
- Elective CS
You may not qualify if:
- Uterine scar
- Thrombophilia
- Dysmorphic uterus
- Connective tissue disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dr. Aya Mohr-Sasson
Ramat Gan, 56506, Israel
Related Publications (6)
Mathai M, Hofmeyr GJ, Mathai NE. Abdominal surgical incisions for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;2013(5):CD004453. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004453.pub3.
PMID: 23728648RESULTWang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, Sun YL, Lin YH, Tseng CJ. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;34(1):85-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.6405.
PMID: 19565535RESULTTulandi T, Cohen A. Emerging Manifestations of Cesarean Scar Defect in Reproductive-aged Women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):893-902. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
PMID: 27393285RESULTvan der Voet LF, Bij de Vaate AM, Veersema S, Brolmann HA, Huirne JA. Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding. BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(2):236-44. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12542.
PMID: 24373597RESULTSholapurkar SL. Etiology of Cesarean Uterine Scar Defect (Niche): Detailed Critical Analysis of Hypotheses and Prevention Strategies and Peritoneal Closure Debate. J Clin Med Res. 2018 Mar;10(3):166-173. doi: 10.14740/jocmr3271w. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
PMID: 29416572RESULTVervoort AJ, Uittenbogaard LB, Hehenkamp WJ, Brolmann HA, Mol BW, Huirne JA. Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development. Hum Reprod. 2015 Dec;30(12):2695-702. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev240. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
PMID: 26409016RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Women will not know which arm they were allocated to
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 12, 2019
First Posted
February 22, 2019
Study Start
May 1, 2019
Primary Completion
July 1, 2022
Study Completion
July 1, 2022
Last Updated
October 3, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09