NCT04359472

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of collecting amniotic fluid at delivery that will be immediately processed and then applied as a spray to the various layers of cesarean wound closure.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 21, 2020

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 24, 2020

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2020

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2023

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

December 13, 2024

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

April 21, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 9, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Collection and reapplication of autologous amniotic fluid

    Feasibility of collection and reapplication of autologous amniotic fluid at the time of a cesarean delivery

    At time of delivery

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Cesarean Wound Complication

    6 weeks

  • Assessment of the Cesarean Wound

    4 weeks

  • Pain Medication Use

    4 and 6 weeks

  • Pain Score

    4 and 6 weeks

Study Arms (1)

Treatment Arm

OTHER

Collection and reapplication of amniotic fluid.

Device: Application of Autologous Amniotic Fluid

Interventions

Collection and reapplication of amniotic fluid at wound layers during a cesarean section.

Treatment Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsPregnant female \> 18 years old, single gestation, plan for cesarean delivery, planned gestational age \> 37 weeks at the time of delivery, english speaking, able to provide own informed consent, intention of being available for entire study period
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Pregnant female age great than 18 years
  • Singleton gestation
  • Plan for cesarean delivery
  • Planned gestational age of at least weeks at the time of delivery
  • English speaking
  • Able to provide own informed consent
  • Intention of being available for entire study period and complete all relevant study procedures, including follow-up study visits and phone calls

You may not qualify if:

  • Diabetes requiring therapy (type I or type II diabetes, gestational diabetes on medical therapy)
  • BMI greater than or equal to 40 kg/m2 at the time of enrollment
  • Placenta previa or placenta accreta
  • Prior bowel or urologic surgery (except un-ruptured appendectomy or uncomplicated cholecystectomy)
  • Multiple gestation
  • Previous history of postpartum hemorrhage requiring medical or surgical treatment
  • Known or suspected impairment of immunologic function including infection with HIV, hepatitis B or C
  • Known tobacco or drug use
  • Any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, may pose a health risk to the subject or interfere with the evaluation of the study objectives
  • History of keloid formation
  • Labor at time of presentation to labor and delivery (regular, painful uterine contractions occurring every 5 minutes with evidence of cervical change)
  • Chorioamnionitis or other systemic infection at time of presentation for cesarean section, including evidence of lower abdominal skin infection (i.e. yeast, etc)
  • Need for urgent Cesarean section (examples include, but not limited to: non-reassuring fetal status (category II or III tracing), placental abruption, severe preeclampsia or eclampsia)
  • Rupture of membranes prior to the start of the surgery
  • Meconium-stained or blood-stained amniotic fluid
  • +6 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Duke University

Durham, North Carolina, 27708, United States

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJ. Births: Preliminary Data for 2015. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2016 Jun;65(3):1-15.

    PMID: 27309256BACKGROUND
  • Osterman MJ, Martin JA. Primary cesarean delivery rates, by state: results from the revised birth certificate, 2006-2012. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2014 Jan;63(1):1-11.

    PMID: 24461076BACKGROUND
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College); Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine; Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;210(3):179-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026.

    PMID: 24565430BACKGROUND
  • Nisenblat V, Barak S, Griness OB, Degani S, Ohel G, Gonen R. Maternal complications associated with multiple cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jul;108(1):21-6. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000222380.11069.11.

    PMID: 16816051BACKGROUND
  • Faulk WP, Matthews R, Stevens PJ, Bennett JP, Burgos H, Hsi BL. Human amnion as an adjunct in wound healing. Lancet. 1980 May 31;1(8179):1156-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)91617-7.

    PMID: 6155575BACKGROUND
  • Stock SJ, Kelly RW, Riley SC, Calder AA. Natural antimicrobial production by the amnion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;196(3):255.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.908.

    PMID: 17346544BACKGROUND
  • Brady C, Vang S, Christensen K, Isler J, Vollstedt K, Holt D. Use of autologous platelet gel in bariatric surgery. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2006 Jun;38(2):161-4.

    PMID: 16921691BACKGROUND
  • Everts PA, Devilee RJ, Oosterbos CJ, Mahoney CB, Schattenkerk ME, Knape JT, van Zundert A. Autologous platelet gel and fibrin sealant enhance the efficacy of total knee arthroplasty: improved range of motion, decreased length of stay and a reduced incidence of arthrofibrosis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 Jul;15(7):888-94. doi: 10.1007/s00167-007-0296-x. Epub 2007 Feb 24.

    PMID: 17323096BACKGROUND
  • Thiebes AL, Reddemann MA, Palmer J, Kneer R, Jockenhoevel S, Cornelissen CG. Flexible Endoscopic Spray Application of Respiratory Epithelial Cells as Platform Technology to Apply Cells in Tubular Organs. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2016 Apr;22(4):322-31. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2015.0381. Epub 2016 Mar 18.

    PMID: 26739252BACKGROUND
  • Trowbridge CC, Stammers AH, Woods E, Yen BR, Klayman M, Gilbert C. Use of platelet gel and its effects on infection in cardiac surgery. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2005 Dec;37(4):381-6.

    PMID: 16524157BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Infections

Study Officials

  • Jennifer Gilner, MD

    Duke University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2020

First Posted

April 24, 2020

Study Start

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion

September 1, 2023

Study Completion

September 1, 2024

Last Updated

December 13, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations