NCT03835273

Brief Summary

Open surgery for esophageal cancer commonly involves large incisions in the chest, associated with a high rate of pulmonary complications (30-50%). Minimally invasive approach through keyhole surgery has been shown to reduce pulmonary infections by 20%. Enhanced recovery programmes are evidence-based protocols, developed to achieve early recovery after surgery with early mobilisation and chest physiotherapy and have been shown to reduce pulmonary complication rates as well. The investigators intend to objectively measure chest wall movement using 3D motion capture system as well as a wearable measurement system to monitor chest wall movement.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2019

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 6, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 8, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 29, 2019

Completed
6.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 3, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

6.3 years

First QC Date

February 6, 2019

Last Update Submit

June 30, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

EsophagectomyMotion captureRespiratoryOesophageal cancer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Chest wall movement

    Evaluation of changes in chest wall movement in patients who have undergone oesophagectomy more than a year ago (open surgery) and in healthy control participants. Reflective markers will be placed on the chest wall of the participant and chest wall movement will be detected by a 3D motion capture system using these markers. In addition, inertia measurement units will be applied next to the markers. Chest wall movement will be assessed during normal breathing, take and hold a deep breath and whilst performing incentive spirometry.

    Each participant will undergone one assessment during the study. The whole session, all procedures included, will last approximately 60 minutes.

  • Lung function

    Patients will be asked to perform incentive spirometry which is a non-invasive assessment of the lung function. Spirometry (tidal breathing, forced vital capacity) and respiratory muscle strength will be recorded for all participants.

    Each participant will undergone one assessment during the study. The whole session, all procedures included, will last approximately 60 minutes.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Health-related Quality of Life in cancer patients

    Each participant will undergone one assessment during the study. The whole session, all procedures included, will last approximately 60 minutes.

  • Health-related Quality of Life in patients with tumours of the oesophagus, oesophago-gastric junction or stomach

    Each participant will undergone one assessment during the study. The whole session, all procedures included, will last approximately 60 minutes.

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Usability and acceptability of the measuring device

    Each participant will undergone one assessment during the study. The whole session, all procedures included, will last approximately 60 minutes.

Study Arms (2)

Control group

Fourty control participants who have not received upper gastrointestinal surgery.

Other: 3D motion capture systemOther: Incentive spirometryOther: Questionnaires

Open surgery

Sixty patients who have undergone open removal of oesophagus more than one year ago.

Other: 3D motion capture systemOther: Incentive spirometryOther: Questionnaires

Interventions

Small reflective markers and inertia measurement units will be placed on the chest of the patients using hypoallergenic adhesive and a motion capture system will pick up a 3D image via these markers non-invasively.

Control groupOpen surgery

Incentive spirometry is a non-invasive device for assessment of pulmonary function.

Control groupOpen surgery

Three validated, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Oesophago-Gastric Module 25 (EORTC QLQ-OG25) and LASORS questionnaire.

Control groupOpen surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Three cohorts will be studied, equal in size. A total of 100 patients will be included in this study. One hundred patients who have undergone oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer more than a year ago, 60 patients who have undergone open surgery and 40 healthy volunteers will be included as a control group with no underlying respiratory disease and no previous history of upper gastrointestinal surgery. Patients who have undergone oesophagectomy will be identified from existing databases by the direct care team of the patient. Healthy volunteers will be recruited from Imperial College through paper adverts.

You may qualify if:

  • Exposure group:
  • Patients treated more than a year ago with oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer, by an open approach.
  • Control group:
  • Healthy volunteers with no underlying respiratory disease and no history of upper gastrointestinal surgery.

You may not qualify if:

  • Any participant who lacks capacity or is unable to provide informed consent.
  • Any participant younger than 18 or older than 90 years of age.
  • Any patient with evidence of cancer recurrence or on-going postoperative complication at more than one year following surgery for oesophageal cancer.
  • Any pregnant participant.
  • unable to or excluded from performing spirometry or respiratory muscle strength testing (non-invasive testing)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Charing Cross Hospital

London, W6 8RF, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

Related Publications (8)

  • Shirinzadeh A, Talebi Y. Pulmonary Complications due to Esophagectomy. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2011;3(3):93-6. doi: 10.5681/jcvtr.2011.020. Epub 2011 Aug 20.

    PMID: 24250962BACKGROUND
  • Nagawa H, Kobori O, Muto T. Prediction of pulmonary complications after transthoracic oesophagectomy. Br J Surg. 1994 Jun;81(6):860-2. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810622.

    PMID: 8044603BACKGROUND
  • Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, Gisbertz SS, Klinkenbijl JH, Hollmann MW, de Lange ES, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012 May 19;379(9829):1887-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9. Epub 2012 May 1.

    PMID: 22552194BACKGROUND
  • Kubo N, Ohira M, Yamashita Y, Sakurai K, Toyokawa T, Tanaka H, Muguruma K, Shibutani M, Yamazoe S, Kimura K, Nagahara H, Amano R, Ohtani H, Yashiro M, Maeda K, Hirakawa K. The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014 May;34(5):2399-404.

    PMID: 24778050BACKGROUND
  • Schmidt HM, El Lakis MA, Markar SR, Hubka M, Low DE. Accelerated Recovery Within Standardized Recovery Pathways After Esophagectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study Assessing the Effects of Early Discharge on Outcomes, Readmissions, Patient Satisfaction, and Costs. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Sep;102(3):931-939. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 Jun 7.

    PMID: 27283109BACKGROUND
  • Li C, Ferri LE, Mulder DS, Ncuti A, Neville A, Lee L, Kaneva P, Watson D, Vassiliou M, Carli F, Feldman LS. An enhanced recovery pathway decreases duration of stay after esophagectomy. Surgery. 2012 Oct;152(4):606-14; discussion 614-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.021. Epub 2012 Sep 1.

    PMID: 22943844BACKGROUND
  • Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.

    PMID: 8433390BACKGROUND
  • Lagergren P, Fayers P, Conroy T, Stein HJ, Sezer O, Hardwick R, Hammerlid E, Bottomley A, Van Cutsem E, Blazeby JM; European Organisation for Research Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal and Quality of Life Groups. Clinical and psychometric validation of a questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OG25, to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer of the oesophagus, the oesophago-gastric junction and the stomach. Eur J Cancer. 2007 Sep;43(14):2066-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.07.005. Epub 2007 Aug 15.

    PMID: 17702567BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Neoplasms

Interventions

Surveys and Questionnaires

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsHead and Neck NeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Sheraz R Markar, Dr

    Imperial College London

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2019

First Posted

February 8, 2019

Study Start

May 29, 2019

Primary Completion

August 31, 2025

Study Completion

August 31, 2025

Last Updated

July 3, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations