Oesophagectomy and Chest Wall and Respiratory Function
Changes in Respiratory Function and Chest Wall Movement Following Oesophagectomy
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Open surgery for esophageal cancer commonly involves large incisions in the chest, associated with a high rate of pulmonary complications (30-50%). Minimally invasive approach through keyhole surgery has been shown to reduce pulmonary infections by 20%. Enhanced recovery programmes are evidence-based protocols, developed to achieve early recovery after surgery with early mobilisation and chest physiotherapy and have been shown to reduce pulmonary complication rates as well. The investigators intend to objectively measure chest wall movement using 3D motion capture system as well as a wearable measurement system to monitor chest wall movement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2019
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 6, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 8, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 29, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2025
CompletedJuly 3, 2025
June 1, 2025
6.3 years
February 6, 2019
June 30, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Chest wall movement
Evaluation of changes in chest wall movement in patients who have undergone oesophagectomy more than a year ago (open surgery) and in healthy control participants. Reflective markers will be placed on the chest wall of the participant and chest wall movement will be detected by a 3D motion capture system using these markers. In addition, inertia measurement units will be applied next to the markers. Chest wall movement will be assessed during normal breathing, take and hold a deep breath and whilst performing incentive spirometry.
Each participant will undergone one assessment during the study. The whole session, all procedures included, will last approximately 60 minutes.
Lung function
Patients will be asked to perform incentive spirometry which is a non-invasive assessment of the lung function. Spirometry (tidal breathing, forced vital capacity) and respiratory muscle strength will be recorded for all participants.
Each participant will undergone one assessment during the study. The whole session, all procedures included, will last approximately 60 minutes.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Health-related Quality of Life in cancer patients
Each participant will undergone one assessment during the study. The whole session, all procedures included, will last approximately 60 minutes.
Health-related Quality of Life in patients with tumours of the oesophagus, oesophago-gastric junction or stomach
Each participant will undergone one assessment during the study. The whole session, all procedures included, will last approximately 60 minutes.
Other Outcomes (1)
Usability and acceptability of the measuring device
Each participant will undergone one assessment during the study. The whole session, all procedures included, will last approximately 60 minutes.
Study Arms (2)
Control group
Fourty control participants who have not received upper gastrointestinal surgery.
Open surgery
Sixty patients who have undergone open removal of oesophagus more than one year ago.
Interventions
Small reflective markers and inertia measurement units will be placed on the chest of the patients using hypoallergenic adhesive and a motion capture system will pick up a 3D image via these markers non-invasively.
Incentive spirometry is a non-invasive device for assessment of pulmonary function.
Three validated, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Oesophago-Gastric Module 25 (EORTC QLQ-OG25) and LASORS questionnaire.
Eligibility Criteria
Three cohorts will be studied, equal in size. A total of 100 patients will be included in this study. One hundred patients who have undergone oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer more than a year ago, 60 patients who have undergone open surgery and 40 healthy volunteers will be included as a control group with no underlying respiratory disease and no previous history of upper gastrointestinal surgery. Patients who have undergone oesophagectomy will be identified from existing databases by the direct care team of the patient. Healthy volunteers will be recruited from Imperial College through paper adverts.
You may qualify if:
- Exposure group:
- Patients treated more than a year ago with oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer, by an open approach.
- Control group:
- Healthy volunteers with no underlying respiratory disease and no history of upper gastrointestinal surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- Any participant who lacks capacity or is unable to provide informed consent.
- Any participant younger than 18 or older than 90 years of age.
- Any patient with evidence of cancer recurrence or on-going postoperative complication at more than one year following surgery for oesophageal cancer.
- Any pregnant participant.
- unable to or excluded from performing spirometry or respiratory muscle strength testing (non-invasive testing)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Charing Cross Hospital
London, W6 8RF, United Kingdom
Related Publications (8)
Shirinzadeh A, Talebi Y. Pulmonary Complications due to Esophagectomy. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2011;3(3):93-6. doi: 10.5681/jcvtr.2011.020. Epub 2011 Aug 20.
PMID: 24250962BACKGROUNDNagawa H, Kobori O, Muto T. Prediction of pulmonary complications after transthoracic oesophagectomy. Br J Surg. 1994 Jun;81(6):860-2. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810622.
PMID: 8044603BACKGROUNDBiere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, Gisbertz SS, Klinkenbijl JH, Hollmann MW, de Lange ES, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012 May 19;379(9829):1887-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9. Epub 2012 May 1.
PMID: 22552194BACKGROUNDKubo N, Ohira M, Yamashita Y, Sakurai K, Toyokawa T, Tanaka H, Muguruma K, Shibutani M, Yamazoe S, Kimura K, Nagahara H, Amano R, Ohtani H, Yashiro M, Maeda K, Hirakawa K. The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014 May;34(5):2399-404.
PMID: 24778050BACKGROUNDSchmidt HM, El Lakis MA, Markar SR, Hubka M, Low DE. Accelerated Recovery Within Standardized Recovery Pathways After Esophagectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study Assessing the Effects of Early Discharge on Outcomes, Readmissions, Patient Satisfaction, and Costs. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Sep;102(3):931-939. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
PMID: 27283109BACKGROUNDLi C, Ferri LE, Mulder DS, Ncuti A, Neville A, Lee L, Kaneva P, Watson D, Vassiliou M, Carli F, Feldman LS. An enhanced recovery pathway decreases duration of stay after esophagectomy. Surgery. 2012 Oct;152(4):606-14; discussion 614-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.021. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
PMID: 22943844BACKGROUNDAaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
PMID: 8433390BACKGROUNDLagergren P, Fayers P, Conroy T, Stein HJ, Sezer O, Hardwick R, Hammerlid E, Bottomley A, Van Cutsem E, Blazeby JM; European Organisation for Research Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal and Quality of Life Groups. Clinical and psychometric validation of a questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OG25, to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer of the oesophagus, the oesophago-gastric junction and the stomach. Eur J Cancer. 2007 Sep;43(14):2066-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.07.005. Epub 2007 Aug 15.
PMID: 17702567BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sheraz R Markar, Dr
Imperial College London
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2019
First Posted
February 8, 2019
Study Start
May 29, 2019
Primary Completion
August 31, 2025
Study Completion
August 31, 2025
Last Updated
July 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share