Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE) in Prone Versus Left Decubitus Position
2 other identifiers
interventional
2
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this prospective randomized study is to compare clinical outcomes from two different patient position(prone vs left decubitus)with thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization in the procedure of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE).
- Comparing morbidities from the two groups
- Comparing short-term quality of life from the two groups
- Comparing oncological results (3,5 year survival) from the two groups
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Jul 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 26, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 15, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedMarch 8, 2011
February 1, 2011
3.4 years
May 26, 2010
March 7, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Perioperative morbidity and mortality from the two groups
1 -5 years after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (2)
short-term quality of life(postoperative 6 months and 1 year) between the two groups
1 year
3-and 5-year survival rate between the two groups
1 - 5 years after surgery
Interventions
In prone position group, patients are intubated with single lumen endotracheal tube. Surgeon and assistant stand on the right of the patient. A 10 mm camera port is placed 7th intercostals space in posterior axillary line, CO2 pneumothorax is created with pressure of 8mmHg. A 5 mm port is placed just posterior to the scapular tip. The last 10mm port is placed at 9th intercostals space in the scapular line for. The tumor and esophagus are dissected with cleaning of the lymph nodes along bilateral recurrent nerve. In controlling group, The four chest ports were similar to that described by the University of Pittsburgh group. The left two ports are used for surgical exposure, the right two ports is to divide and dissect the esophagus. The dissection is similar to that of the prone position.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- clinical stage I/II esophageal cancer
- normal blood test of basic metabolism panel
- pulmonary function: FEV1 \> 1.2L, FEV1% \> 50%, DLCO \> 50%
- heart function: NY grade I and grade II
- sign informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy
- Mental disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Fudan Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Zhong Shan Hospital, Fu Dan University
Shanghai, 200032, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 26, 2010
First Posted
June 15, 2010
Study Start
July 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 8, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-02