Evaluation of the Treatment Approach ROBIN

NCT03829527 | Unknown DMC

• 1 other identifier: ETRo2017-00012
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 30
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The prevention of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders has led researchers to focus on early identification of individuals at Clinical High Risk (CHR) for psychosis and to treat the at-risk symptoms in the pre-psychotic period. Although at-risk symptoms such as attenuated hallucinations or delusions are common in adolescents and associated with a marked reduction in global functioning, the evidence base of effective interventions for adolescents at CHR state and even first-episode psychosis is limited. To fill this gap, the clinicians from the early intervention center in Zurich have developed the treatment approach "Robin" (standardized manual and smartphone App) for adolescents with high risk for developing a psychotic disorder. The treatment approach is based on existing therapy strategies for adolescents with first episode of psychosis and the available recommendations for adults with at-risk symptoms. The evaluation aims firstly to compare the efficacy of "Robin" in 30 CHR adolescents aged 14-18 to an active control group (treatment as usual) from a previous study. Primary outcome measures will be at-risk symptomatology, comorbid diagnosis, functioning, self-efficacy and quality of life. For the prospective intervention condition (16 weekly individual sessions + a minimum 4 family sessions), help-seeking adolescents with CHR for psychosis, aged 14-18, will be recruited over three years. At-risk and comorbid symptoms, functioning, self-efficacy and quality of life are monitored at six time points (baseline, during the treatment period, immediately after intervention, and 6, 12, and 24 months later) and compared to the respective measures of the active control group.

Conditions

Clinical High Risk for Psychosis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

• Changes in at risk symptoms over the different time points

  According to a structured clinical interviews about the clinical high risk state(SIPS, SPI-CY)

  Baseline (0 months); during the treatment (2 months), post-treatment (4 months), follow ups (6, 12, 24 months)

• Changes in comorbid symptoms over the different time points

  According to a structured clinical interviews about the comorbid symptoms (M.I.N.I. Kid)

  Baseline (0 months); during the treatment (2 months), post-treatment (4 months), follow ups (6, 12, 24 months)

• Changes in overall global functioning over the different time points

  Measured by Global Assessment of Functioning Scale GAF. The Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) is a numeric scale used by mental health clinicians and physicians to rate subjectively the social, occupational, and psychological functioning of an individual, e.g., how well one is meeting various problems-in-living. Scores range from 100 (extremely high functioning) to 1 (severely impaired).

  Baseline (0 months); during the treatment (2 months), post-treatment (4 months), follow ups (6, 12, 24 months)

• Changes in the social and occupational functioning over the different time points

  Measured by the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale SOFA . The SOFAS is a new scale that differs from the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale in that it focuses exclusively on the individual's level of social and occupational functioning and is not directly influenced by the overall severity of the individual's psychological symptoms. The SOFAS is a global rating of current functioning ranging from 0 to 100, with lower scores representing lower functioning.

  Baseline (0 months); during the treatment (2 months), post-treatment (4 months), follow ups (6, 12, 24 months)

• Changes in social functioning over the different time points

  Measured by theGlobal Functioning: Social (GF: Social) scale The GF: Social scale assesses quantity and quality of peer relationships, level of peer conflict, age-appropriate intimate relationships, and involvement with family members. Emphasis is placed on age-appropriate social contacts and interactions outside of the family, with a particular focus on social withdrawal and isolation. The scales range from 1 till 10 (10 is the highest rating).

  Baseline (0 months); during the treatment (2 months), post-treatment (4 months), follow ups (6, 12, 24 months)

• Changes in the quality of life over the different time points: MANSA

  Self reported level of life quality measured with the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA). 16 questions are to be asked every time the instrument is applied. Four of these questions are termed objective and to be answered with yes or no. Twelve questions are strictly subjective. The satisfaction is rated on 7-point rating scales ( = negative extreme, 7 = positive extreme). The twelve items are in the end combined (summed) to get a total score about the life quality.

  Baseline (0 months); during the treatment (2 months), post-treatment (4 months), follow ups (6, 12, 24 months)

• Changes in the self efficacy over the different time points: General Self-efficacy Scale (SWE)

  Self reported level of self efficacy measured with the General Self-efficacy Scale (SWE). The General Self-Efficacy Scale is a 10-item psychometric scale that is designed to assess optimistic self-beliefs to cope with a variety of difficult demands in life. The total score can vary between 10 (very low self-efficacy) and 40 (very high self-efficacy).

  Baseline (0 months); during the treatment (2 months), post-treatment (4 months), follow ups (6, 12, 24 months)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

• Satisfaction with the treatment: questionnaire

  4 months (post-treatment)

• 7.Satisfaction with the smartphone application Robin Z: feedback form.

  4 months (post-treatment)

Study Arms (1)

Psychotherapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Behavioral: Psychotherapy

Interventions

Psychotherapy BEHAVIORAL

Psychological intervention combining a standardized treatment manual with a smartphone application

Psychotherapy

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 14 Years - 18 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• \) At least two self-experienced and self-reported cognitive basic symptoms as assessed by the children-youth version of the Schizophrenia Proneness Interview Child and Youth Version (SPI-CY)
• and/or 2) at least one attenuated psychotic symptom for psychosis assessed by the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS)

You may not qualify if:

• a diagnosis of a psychotic disorder
• current substance or alcohol dependence
• insufficient German or English language ability
• low intellectual abilities with IQ \<75

Sponsors & Collaborators

• University of Zurich: lead

Study Sites (1)

University of Zurich, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy

Zurich, 8032, Switzerland

RECRUITING

Related Publications (9)

• Fux L, Walger P, Schimmelmann BG, Schultze-Lutter F. The Schizophrenia Proneness Instrument, Child and Youth version (SPI-CY): practicability and discriminative validity. Schizophr Res. 2013 May;146(1-3):69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.02.014. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

  PMID: 23473813 BACKGROUND

• Miller TJ, McGlashan TH, Rosen JL, Cadenhead K, Cannon T, Ventura J, McFarlane W, Perkins DO, Pearlson GD, Woods SW. Prodromal assessment with the structured interview for prodromal syndromes and the scale of prodromal symptoms: predictive validity, interrater reliability, and training to reliability. Schizophr Bull. 2003;29(4):703-15. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007040.

  PMID: 14989408 BACKGROUND

• Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Baker R, Dunbar GC. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57.

  PMID: 9881538 BACKGROUND

• Hall RC. Global assessment of functioning. A modified scale. Psychosomatics. 1995 May-Jun;36(3):267-75. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(95)71666-8.

  PMID: 7638314 BACKGROUND

• Cornblatt BA, Auther AM, Niendam T, Smith CW, Zinberg J, Bearden CE, Cannon TD. Preliminary findings for two new measures of social and role functioning in the prodromal phase of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2007 May;33(3):688-702. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbm029. Epub 2007 Apr 17.

  PMID: 17440198 BACKGROUND

• Morosini PL, Magliano L, Brambilla L, Ugolini S, Pioli R. Development, reliability and acceptability of a new version of the DSM-IV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) to assess routine social functioning. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2000 Apr;101(4):323-9.

  PMID: 10782554 BACKGROUND

• Priebe S, Huxley P, Knight S, Evans S. Application and results of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA). Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1999 Spring;45(1):7-12. doi: 10.1177/002076409904500102.

  PMID: 10443245 BACKGROUND

• Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). General Self-efficacy Scale. Measures in Health Psychology: A User's Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs, (2008), 35-37.

  BACKGROUND

• Traber-Walker N, Gerstenberg M, Metzler S, Joris MR, Karr M, Studer N, Zulauf Logoz M, Roth A, Rossler W, Walitza S, Franscini M. Evaluation of the Combined Treatment Approach "Robin" (Standardized Manual and Smartphone App) for Adolescents at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 6;10:384. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00384. eCollection 2019.

  PMID: 31244692 DERIVED

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Psychotherapy

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral Disciplines and Activities

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: PREVENTION
• Intervention Model: SEQUENTIAL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: January 24, 2019
• First Posted: February 4, 2019
• Study Start: September 1, 2017
• Primary Completion: September 30, 2022
• Study Completion: September 30, 2022
• Last Updated: February 4, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-01

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

CH (1)