In-Home Technology for Dementia Caregivers
Developing and Evaluating In-Home Supportive Technology for Dementia Caregivers
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
5
Brief Summary
This study aims to develop and evaluate in-home assistive technology that is designed to alleviate anxiety, burden, and loneliness in spousal and familial caregivers of individuals with Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2019
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 31, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 4, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 26, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 27, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 27, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 10, 2022
CompletedMay 10, 2022
April 1, 2022
1.8 years
January 31, 2019
March 9, 2022
April 14, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Zarit Burden Interview-Short Form
Questionnaire to measure caregiver burden (Zarit, Reever, \& Bach-Peterson, 1980). 12 items are rated on 0-4 scale. Range: 0-48. No subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
9 months after baseline
Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Questionnaire to measure depression (Radloff, 1977). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range = 0-60). There are no subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes. The clinical cut-off is usually set at a score of 16.
9 months after baseline
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Questionnaire to measure anxiety (Beck, Epstein, Brown, \& Steer, 1988). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range= 0-60). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. There are no subscales. A score greater than 36 is considered to be clinically significant.
9 months after baseline
Satisfaction With Life Scale
Questionnaire measuring overall life satisfaction and well-being (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, \& Griffin, 1985). 5 items scored on a 1-7 scale and summed (Range = 5-35). Lower scores indicate worse outcomes. A score of 20 is considered neutral with higher scores considered increasingly more satisfied and lower scores considered increasingly more dissatisfied.
9 months after baseline
Study Arms (2)
In-Home Technology System
EXPERIMENTALThe full system (sensors for entry, activity, temperature, water leak; voice control; digital display; local router) will be installed in the homes of caregivers by a member of the research team (blind as to arm of the study). Monitoring of sensors, provision of warnings, messaging, and social networking features will be activated remotely for those participants who have been randomly assigned to this arm. Participation will extend over a nine month period with questionnaires (e.g., health and well-being) administered 4 times (at the time of installation and every 3 months thereafter).
Limited In-Home Technology System
SHAM COMPARATORThe full system (sensors for entry, activity, temperature, water leak; voice control; digital display; local router) will be installed in the homes of caregivers by a member of the research team (blind as to arm of the study). Monitoring of the water leak sensor and associated warnings will be activated remotely for those participants who have been randomly assigned to this arm. Participation will extend over a nine month period with questionnaires (e.g., health and well-being) administered 4 times (at the time of installation and every 3 months thereafter).
Interventions
Intelligent bots monitor the in-home sensors, learn typical patterns, and provide caregivers with text messages via cell phone and alerts via the tablet when worrisome behaviors occur. Social contact is encouraged using a trusted circle of friends and family who are encouraged to stay in contact and share photos and videos with the caregiver and person with dementia via the digital display.
Intelligent bot monitors the in-home water leak sensor and provide caregivers with text messages via cell phone and alerts via the tablet when worrisome conditions occur.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Caregivers are fluent/literate in English
- Caregivers currently reside with spouse/family member with dementia
- Caregivers primarily use an iPhone
- Caregiver has wireless internet in home
You may not qualify if:
- Caregivers providing care for individuals with known non-neurodegenerative conditions affecting behavior and cognition
- Caregivers providing care for individuals with longstanding Axis I psychiatric disorder
- Caregivers providing care for individuals with metabolic disorder or major organ dysfunction
- Caregivers providing care for individuals with alcohol abuse or dependence (within 5 years of dementia onset)
- Caregivers providing care for individuals with head trauma with loss of consciousness greater than 30 minutes
- Caregivers providing care for individuals with contraindications to MRI imaging
- Caregivers providing care for individuals with large confluent white matter lesions
- Caregivers providing care for individuals with significant systemic medical illness
- Caregivers providing care for individuals who use a medication likely to affect central nervous system functions adversely
- If you live in the San Francisco Bay Area, Las Vegas (Clark County), Orange County, Los Angeles County, or Oregon, you may complete the following screening questionnaire to determine your eligibility for participation: https://bit.ly/UCBDC Upon completion of the screening questionnaire, the UC Berkeley research team will follow up soon after by email or phone to confirm your eligibility status.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of California, Berkeleylead
- University of California, San Franciscocollaborator
- People Power Companycollaborator
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
Study Sites (5)
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, California, 94720, United States
Los Angeles County
Los Angeles, California, 90011, United States
Orange County
Orange, California, 92856, United States
Clark County
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89108, United States
Oregon
Bend, Oregon, 97701, United States
Related Publications (5)
Chen KH, Wells JL, Otero MC, Lwi SJ, Haase CM, Levenson RW. Greater Experience of Negative Non-Target Emotions by Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases Is Related to Lower Emotional Well-Being in Caregivers. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2017;44(5-6):245-255. doi: 10.1159/000481132. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
PMID: 29216633BACKGROUNDLwi SJ, Ford BQ, Casey JJ, Miller BL, Levenson RW. Poor caregiver mental health predicts mortality of patients with neurodegenerative disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 11;114(28):7319-7324. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701597114. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
PMID: 28655841BACKGROUNDOtero MC, Levenson RW. Lower Visual Avoidance in Dementia Patients Is Associated with Greater Psychological Distress in Caregivers. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2017;43(5-6):247-258. doi: 10.1159/000468146. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
PMID: 28395276BACKGROUNDBrown CL, Lwi SJ, Goodkind MS, Rankin KP, Merrilees J, Miller BL, Levenson RW. Empathic Accuracy Deficits in Patients with Neurodegenerative Disease: Association with Caregiver Depression. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Apr;26(4):484-493. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.10.012. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
PMID: 29289452BACKGROUNDBullard BM, Brown CL, Scheffer JA, Toledo AB, Levenson RW. Emotion Regulation Strategies and Mental Health in Dementia Caregivers: The Moderating Role of Gender. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2024;53(3):128-134. doi: 10.1159/000538398. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
PMID: 38537622DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study intended to recruit 80 participants, 78 individuals did complete the consent form, however towards the end of enrollment, COVID-19 shutdowns occurred and our local IRB (UC Berkeley) did not allow in-person contact with participants, which ruled out the ability to install the treatment (technology) in participants' homes. The total number of participants was 69.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Robert W. Levenson
- Organization
- University of California, Berkeley
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Robert W Levenson, Ph.D.
University of California, Berkeley
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Identical system is installed in all homes regardless of treatment arm. The member of research team who does the installation will now know which treatment arm has been assigned. Initiating the features of the system appropriate to the assigned treatment arm is done remotely by a member of the People Power staff (who has no contact with the participants) following the installation.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 31, 2019
First Posted
February 4, 2019
Study Start
February 26, 2019
Primary Completion
November 27, 2020
Study Completion
November 27, 2020
Last Updated
May 10, 2022
Results First Posted
May 10, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04