Translation of COPE for Publicly-Funded Home Care Clients and Their Families
COPECT
1 other identifier
interventional
582
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This community-based translational trial tests the value of a proven non-pharmacologic intervention for older adults living with dementia and informal caregivers when this intervention is incorporated into a publicly-funded home and community based service program. Half the participants will receive customary publicly-funded services alone, and half will receive customary services plus the proven non-pharmacologic intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 18, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2019
CompletedJune 6, 2023
June 1, 2023
3.8 years
January 26, 2015
June 3, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Functional dependence
The metric for the primary outcome measure is score on the 15-item Caregiver Assessment of Function and Upset (CAFU) measure. The CAFU is adapted from the Functional Independence Measure; each of the 15 items is an activity of daily living (ADL) or instrumental activity of daily living (IADL). Each ADL and IADL item is scored on a 7-point scale ranging from completely independent (score of 7) to needing complete help (score of 1). Person-level functional dependence scores are calculated by summing scores across all items and dividing by the number of items.
Change in functional dependence score between baseline (pre-randomization) and 4 months post-randomization
Study Arms (2)
usual care
NO INTERVENTIONOlder adults with dementia and their family caregivers receive all services for which they are eligible in the Connecticut Home Care Program for Elders.
COPE plus usual care
EXPERIMENTALOlder adults with dementia and their family caregivers receive Usual care plus the intervention: Care of Persons with Dementia in their Environments.
Interventions
In-home visits by occupational therapist and advanced practice nurse.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Active client in publicly-funded home care program; Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease or other dementia OR \>=4 errors on the Mental Status Questionnaire; speaks or understands English
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosed schizophrenia or bipolar disorder; bedbound; participation in experimental drug study to treat agitation; home environment deemed unsafe or unsanitary.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- UConn Healthlead
Study Sites (1)
UConn Center on Aging
Farmington, Connecticut, 06030-5215, United States
Related Publications (4)
Fortinsky RH, Gitlin LN, Pizzi LT, Piersol CV, Grady J, Robison JT, Molony S. Translation of the Care of Persons with Dementia in their Environments (COPE) intervention in a publicly-funded home care context: Rationale and research design. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Jul;49:155-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
PMID: 27394383RESULTFortinsky RH, Gitlin LN, Pizzi LT, Piersol CV, Grady J, Robison JT, Molony S, Wakefield D. Effectiveness of the Care of Persons With Dementia in Their Environments Intervention When Embedded in a Publicly Funded Home- and Community-Based Service Program. Innov Aging. 2020 Oct 26;4(6):igaa053. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaa053. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 33367114RESULTPizzi LT, Jutkowitz E, Prioli KM, Lu EY, Babcock Z, McAbee-Sevick H, Wakefield DB, Robison J, Molony S, Piersol CV, Gitlin LN, Fortinsky RH. Cost-Benefit Analysis of the COPE Program for Persons Living With Dementia: Toward a Payment Model. Innov Aging. 2021 Oct 16;6(1):igab042. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igab042. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35047708RESULTKellett K, Robison J, McAbee-Sevick H, Gitlin LN, Verrier Piersol C, Fortinsky RH. Implementing the Care of Persons With Dementia in Their Environments (COPE) Intervention in Community-Based Programs: Acceptability and Perceived Benefit From Care Managers' and Interventionists' Perspectives. Gerontologist. 2023 Jan 24;63(1):28-39. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac068.
PMID: 35581164RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard H Fortinsky, PhD
UConn Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2015
First Posted
February 18, 2015
Study Start
May 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2019
Study Completion
September 30, 2019
Last Updated
June 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national meetings in gerontology, geriatrics, public health, occupational therapy and nursing. Research-quality data which documents, supports and validates research findings will be made publicly available after main findings from the final research data set have been accepted for publication. Such data will be completely de-identified to prevent disclosure of individual study participant information, and will be shared on electronic media. We will request a data-sharing agreement that provides for a commitment to using the data only for research purposes, securing the data using appropriate computer technology, not redistributed to third parties, destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed, and a proper acknowledgement of the data resource.