Study Stopped
We did not receive funding to conduct the study
CGM/Clarity Use, Glycemic Control and Clinical Outcomes
Improving Glycemic Control and Clinical Outcomes in Insulin Treated DM2 Patients Managed with CGM Devices and Clarity, a Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is rising and more than 30 million of Americans or 9.4% of the US population has DM. Several large scale randomized clinical trials have found that improved glycemic control reduces the development of complications in patients with DM. However intensive glucose management carries an increased risk of hypoglycemia, a condition that may lead to neurological damage and is associated with increased incidence of cardiovascular events and mortality. Reducing uncontrolled hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia represents therefore an important objective, as may decrease the direct and indirect impact that diabetes has in our health care system. Achieving optimal glycemic control requires frequent blood glucose monitoring by the patients and recurrent clinic visits,which is often difficult to achieve, as access to typical DM clinic is at least sub optimal. m-Health and telemedicine health solutions represent alternative ways to manage patients in the outpatient setting and have been applied in different medical areas, among them in diabetes. However, almost all the telemedicine studies that have been previously performed and recruited DM patients used telemedicine solutions which were based on point of care (POC) finger-stick glucose testing, which are checked infrequently , usually 4-6 times/day. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices offer additional ways to monitor blood glucose values and can provide numerous glucose measurements (as frequent as every 5 min). By using software applications, such as the Clarity (Dexcom), which highlights glucose patterns, trends and statistics in standardized reports, providers can make safe recommendations of adjusting DM medications, especially insulin titration. In this randomized clinical trial investigators propose to use CGM devices and Clarity software as a telemedicine platform in order to improve glycemic control and improve health outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Nov 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 28, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 22, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 22, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 22, 2024
CompletedNovember 26, 2024
November 1, 2024
Same day
January 28, 2019
November 22, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) among participants who are managed with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices and Clarity versus participants who are managed with Point of Care glucose testing (standard of care)
Through study completion, 6 months after randomization
Change in the number of hypoglycemic episodes among participants who are managed with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices and Clarity versus participants who are managed with Point of Care glucose testing (standard of care)
Through study completion, 6 months after randomization
Change in the number of hospitalizations among participants who are managed with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices and Clarity versus participants who are managed with Point of Care glucose testing (standard of care)
Through study completion, 6 months after randomization
Change in the number of ED visits among participants who are managed with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices and Clarity versus participants who are managed with Point of Care glucose testing (standard of care)
Through study completion, 6 months after randomization
Change in mortality among participants who are managed with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices and Clarity versus participants who are managed with Point of Care glucose testing (standard of care)
Through study completion, 6 months after randomization
Study Arms (2)
Continuous glucose Monitoring and Clarity
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients with DM2 and abnormal glycemic control followed by Continuous glucose Monitoring, using Clarity software
Point of Care Fingerstick Glucose values
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients with DM2 and abnormal glycemic control followed by Point of Care Fingerstick Glucose values
Interventions
Patients with DM2 at the intervention group will be managed by Continuous glucose Monitoring and Clarity software
Testing Blood Glucose levels with Point of Care (POC) blood glucose
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- History of Diabetes Mellitus type 2 (DM2) on insulin
- Uncontrolled glycemic control \[hyperglycemia defined as Hba1c≥9% in the last 3 months or clinically important hypoglycemia (any reported glucose values less than 54 mg/dl) or severe hypoglycemia (low glucose value that led to a severe event characterized by altered mental status and or physical status requiring assistance)\]
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects that have a history of type 1 DM
- History of type 2 DM, not treated or required to be treated with basal/bolus insulin (i.e diet only, any combination of non insulin antidiabetic drugs only, basal only insulin or bolus/short acting only insulin, or pre-mixed insulins) as these patients are less likely to benefit from CGM use.
- Pregnant patients
- Use of Clarity/ Share or follow applications as telehealth/telemedicine to improve DM management during the last 3 months prior to study entry.
- Extensive skin changes/disease or allergies that preclude wearing the CGM sensor
- Significant psychiatric illness or any mental condition rendering the subject incapable of understanding the objectives and potential consequences of the study.
- Subjects without personal computer and internet network access.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Maryland, Baltimorelead
- Baltimore VA Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Baltimore VA Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Medicine, VA Staff Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 28, 2019
First Posted
February 1, 2019
Study Start
November 22, 2024
Primary Completion
November 22, 2024
Study Completion
November 22, 2024
Last Updated
November 26, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No, only de-identified data are going to be shared.