End-expiratory Occlusion Test and Lung Recruitment Maneuver to Assess Fluid responsiVeness In Surgical Patients
ELVIS
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The functional hemodynamic test (FHT) called passive leg raising (PLR) has been successfully used for assessing the fluid responsiveness in ICU patients since 2009 and its reliability has been confirmed by three large meta-analyses. However, the PLR is not usually practicable in the OR. A lot of different FHTs have been proposed, as alternative to the PLR, in ICU and, more recently, OR. These tests could be basically subdivided in two groups. A subgroup of FHTs is based on sudden and brief variations of the mechanical ventilation to induce a change in right ventricle preload and/or after load and, as consequence, of left ventricle SV. A second subgroup aims at testing the increase in SV after the rapid administration of a small aliquot of the predefined FC. Among the first group, the end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) and the lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) have been previously successfully tested in surgical patients. The EEOT consists of the interruption of the mechanical ventilation for 30 seconds, whereas the LRM consists in the increase in the peak inspiratory pressure up to 30 cmH20 for 30 seconds and in the assessment of the changes in the SV after the maneuvers. These tests are safe and can be easily applicable during the surgery to predict fluid responsiveness and optimize the fluid therapy. The primary aim of the present study is to compare the reliability of EEOT and LRM in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing general surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedFebruary 11, 2020
February 1, 2020
8 months
January 24, 2019
February 10, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
AUC difference
To assess the difference in the area under (AUC) the receiving operator characteristic curve (ROC)
10 minutes after fluid challenge administration
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Sensitivity and Specificity
10 minutes after fluid challenge administration
Study Arms (1)
Treatment - hemodynamic tests
EXPERIMENTALTreatment - hemodynamic tests: The EEOT is performed by interrupting the mechanical ventilation for 30 seconds, by using and end-expiratory hold on the ventilator. The LRM is performed by using a single act of mechanical ventilation in pressure-controlled mode at 30 cmH20 for 30 seconds
Interventions
The EEOT is performed by interrupting the mechanical ventilation for 30 seconds, by using and end-expiratory hold on the ventilator.
The LRM is performed by using a single act of mechanical ventilation in pressure-controlled mode at 30 cmH20 for 30 seconds
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients aged ≥ 18 years;
- Scheduled for elective supine abdominal surgery and requiring invasive arterial monitoring;
- Glasgow coma scale 15 at recruitment. All the patients must be able to sign an informed consent at the admission.
You may not qualify if:
- Any recurrent cardiac arrhythmias;
- Reduced left (ejection fraction \<30%) or right (systolic peak velocity of tricuspid annular motion \<0.17 m/s) ventricular systolic function;
- Chronic use beta-blocking agents.
- History of pneumothorax.
- BMI \> 40
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Humanitas Research Hospital
Rozzano, Milano, 20089, Italy
Related Publications (2)
Biais M, Larghi M, Henriot J, de Courson H, Sesay M, Nouette-Gaulain K. End-Expiratory Occlusion Test Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Protective Ventilation in the Operating Room. Anesth Analg. 2017 Dec;125(6):1889-1895. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002322.
PMID: 28742783RESULTBiais M, Lanchon R, Sesay M, Le Gall L, Pereira B, Futier E, Nouette-Gaulain K. Changes in Stroke Volume Induced by Lung Recruitment Maneuver Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Operating Room. Anesthesiology. 2017 Feb;126(2):260-267. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001459.
PMID: 27922547RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- ICU senior consultant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2019
First Posted
January 29, 2019
Study Start
May 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
February 11, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02