Carotid Doppler and EEOT for Fluid Responsiveness Prediction
Can Carotid Artery Doppler Variations Induced by End-expiratory Occlusion Manoeuvre Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Septic Shock Patients?
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Fluid responsiveness prediction prior to fluid challenge administration is a topic of interest, which has been extensively investigated, but remains challenging. In clinical practice, functional hemodynamic tests (FHT) consisting of maneuvers that affect cardiac function and/or heart-lung interaction, have been introduced in order to identify fluid responders and non-responders without fluid challenge administration. Changes in cardiac output induced by the Passive Leg Raising (PLR) test reliably predicted the increase in cardiac output to volume expansion. New approaches have been recently developed based on changes in respiratory dynamics, such as a transient increase in tidal volume, or a lung recruitment maneuver or an end-expiratory occlusion (EEO) test. The EEO leaded to an increase in venous return, cardiac preload and stroke volume in preload-responsive patients. The authors found that an increase in cardiac output ≥ 5% during a 15-s EEO reliably predicted its response to a 500-ml saline infusion. However, in order to identify the rapid and transient increase in cardiac index during the EEO, continuous and instantaneous cardiac output monitoring is necessary. Pulse contour analysis methods provide a beat-to-beat estimation of cardiac output and had been used in most of studies validating the EEO test. Carotid doppler is a non-invasive, bedside, easy to use ultrasound technique that measuring blood flow peak velocity (CDPV) and duration of systolic component of each cardiac cycle (from the onset to dicrotic notch- Flow time - FT) allows a reliable estimation of fluid status and could be an interesting alternative to track changes in SV and cardiac output.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 6, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 14, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedJuly 1, 2021
June 1, 2021
1.6 years
July 6, 2020
June 28, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Fluid responsiveness
Evaluation of changes in systolic peak velocity (ΔV peak-CA) and in flow time (ΔFT) using carotid artery Doppler during an end-expiratory occlusion test and after fluid-challenge (500 ml)
during EEOT
Study Arms (1)
septic shock patients
EXPERIMENTALIntubated patients with septic shock receive an end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) and, after the test, they receive a 500 ml-fluid challenge. During these phases the carotid doppler changes will be recorded.
Interventions
An occlusion manoeuvre during the end of expiration for 20 seconds
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- sedated and mechanically ventilated patients
- need a fluid challenge
- hypotension defined as a systolic arterial pressure ≤90 mmHg
- tachycardia ≥100 beats/min
- urinary flow ≤0.5 mL/kg/min for 2 hrs
You may not qualify if:
- age\< 18 y old
- significant valvular heart diseases
- cardiac arrhythmia
- peripheral arterial disease
- common carotid artery stenosis greater than 50%
- spontaneous breathing.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS
Roma, RM, 00168, Italy
Related Publications (10)
Pinsky MR. Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Crit Care Clin. 2015 Jan;31(1):89-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2014.08.005.
PMID: 25435480BACKGROUNDMonnet X, Osman D, Ridel C, Lamia B, Richard C, Teboul JL. Predicting volume responsiveness by using the end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):951-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181968fe1.
PMID: 19237902BACKGROUNDMyatra SN, Prabu NR, Divatia JV, Monnet X, Kulkarni AP, Teboul JL. The Changes in Pulse Pressure Variation or Stroke Volume Variation After a "Tidal Volume Challenge" Reliably Predict Fluid Responsiveness During Low Tidal Volume Ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):415-421. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002183.
PMID: 27922879BACKGROUNDBlehar DJ, Glazier S, Gaspari RJ. Correlation of corrected flow time in the carotid artery with changes in intravascular volume status. J Crit Care. 2014 Aug;29(4):486-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.025. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
PMID: 24930363BACKGROUNDMackenzie DC, Khan NA, Blehar D, Glazier S, Chang Y, Stowell CP, Noble VE, Liteplo AS. Carotid Flow Time Changes With Volume Status in Acute Blood Loss. Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;66(3):277-282.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 May 21.
PMID: 26003002BACKGROUNDHossein-Nejad H, Mohammadinejad P, Lessan-Pezeshki M, Davarani SS, Banaie M. Carotid artery corrected flow time measurement via bedside ultrasonography in monitoring volume status. J Crit Care. 2015 Dec;30(6):1199-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.08.014. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
PMID: 26410681BACKGROUNDShokoohi H, Berry GW, Shahkolahi M, King J, King J, Salimian M, Poshtmashad A, Pourmand A. The diagnostic utility of sonographic carotid flow time in determining volume responsiveness. J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:231-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.10.025. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
PMID: 27987483BACKGROUNDIbarra-Estrada MA, Lopez-Pulgarin JA, Mijangos-Mendez JC, Diaz-Gomez JL, Aguirre-Avalos G. Respiratory variation in carotid peak systolic velocity predicts volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock: a prospective cohort study. Crit Ultrasound J. 2015 Dec;7(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13089-015-0029-1. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
PMID: 26123610BACKGROUNDCecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale R, Bakker J, Hofer C, Jaeschke R, Mebazaa A, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL, Vincent JL, Rhodes A. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Dec;40(12):1795-815. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
PMID: 25392034RESULTD'Arrigo S, Dell'Anna AM, Sandroni C, Messina A, Cacciola S, Pacini C, Antonelli M. Can carotid artery Doppler variations induced by the end-expiratory occlusion maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients? Crit Care. 2023 Apr 19;27(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04422-9.
PMID: 37076861DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 6, 2020
First Posted
July 14, 2020
Study Start
January 1, 2019
Primary Completion
July 30, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
July 1, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share