Sigh35 and End-expiratory Occlusion Test (EEOT) for Assessing flUid Responsiveness in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Pressure Support Ventilation
SETUP
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The application of a brief SIGH of 4 seconds at 35 cmH20 has shown to reliably predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients undergoing pressure support ventilation. The end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) has been also used in the same type of patients, with the same purpose, but in a limited amount of studies. The aim of this study is to compare the reliability of the the two test in assessing fluid responsiveness.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 4, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 14, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2024
CompletedApril 2, 2024
March 1, 2024
2.7 years
June 4, 2021
March 29, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pulse pressure prediction of fluid responsiveness
Pulse pressure changes after SIGH35 application
Evaluated before and after SIGH35 (within 1 minute from SIGH35 application)
Stroke volume prediction of fluid responsiveness
Stroke Volume changes after SIGH35 application
Evaluated before and after SIGH35 (within 1 minute from SIGH35 application)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Pulse pressure prediction of fluid responsiveness
Evaluated before and after EEOT (within 1 minute from EEOT application)
Stroke volume prediction of fluid responsiveness
Evaluated before and after EEOT (within 1 minute from EEOT application)
Other Outcomes (2)
Rate of failure of SIGH test
During the test execution
Rate of failure of EEOT test
During the test execution
Study Arms (1)
Intervention EEO_SIGH
EXPERIMENTALSingle arm intervention. All the patients will receive the two tests (SIGH and EEOT) in 1:1 random sequence order
Interventions
To add the Sigh35 to PSV, the ventilator is set in pressure controlled synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation plus PSV \[SIMV (PC) + PS mode\], with SIMV rate set a 1/min and inspiratory time of 4 seconds. SIMV (PC) = 35 cmH20 of total inspiratory support (PEEP + PS).
• The EEOT is performed by interrupting the mechanical ventilation for 15 seconds, by using and end-expiratory hold on the ventilator. The ventilator trigger is set at 2 L/min.
Bolus of fluids of 4 ml/kg given within 10 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- left ventricular ejection fraction \<30% or severe valvular dysfunction
- atrial fibrillation
- severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
- abdominal compartment syndrome
- air leakage through chest drains
- artifacts in arterial waveform
- pathological respiratory patterns due to neurological diseases
- signs of fatigue or respiratory distress
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Humanitas Research Hospital
Rozzano, Milano, 20089, Italy
Humanitas Research Hospital
Rozzano, Milano, Italy
Related Publications (3)
Messina A, Colombo D, Barra FL, Cammarota G, De Mattei G, Longhini F, Romagnoli S, DellaCorte F, De Backer D, Cecconi M, Navalesi P. Sigh maneuver to enhance assessment of fluid responsiveness during pressure support ventilation. Crit Care. 2019 Jan 28;23(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2294-4.
PMID: 30691523BACKGROUNDPatroniti N, Foti G, Cortinovis B, Maggioni E, Bigatello LM, Cereda M, Pesenti A. Sigh improves gas exchange and lung volume in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing pressure support ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2002 Apr;96(4):788-94. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200204000-00004.
PMID: 11964584BACKGROUNDMonnet X, Osman D, Ridel C, Lamia B, Richard C, Teboul JL. Predicting volume responsiveness by using the end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):951-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181968fe1.
PMID: 19237902BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 4, 2021
First Posted
June 14, 2021
Study Start
February 1, 2022
Primary Completion
October 1, 2024
Study Completion
October 1, 2024
Last Updated
April 2, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03