NCT04924920

Brief Summary

The application of a brief SIGH of 4 seconds at 35 cmH20 has shown to reliably predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients undergoing pressure support ventilation. The end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) has been also used in the same type of patients, with the same purpose, but in a limited amount of studies. The aim of this study is to compare the reliability of the the two test in assessing fluid responsiveness.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 4, 2021

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 14, 2021

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2022

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

April 2, 2024

Status Verified

March 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

June 4, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 29, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Pulse pressure prediction of fluid responsiveness

    Pulse pressure changes after SIGH35 application

    Evaluated before and after SIGH35 (within 1 minute from SIGH35 application)

  • Stroke volume prediction of fluid responsiveness

    Stroke Volume changes after SIGH35 application

    Evaluated before and after SIGH35 (within 1 minute from SIGH35 application)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Pulse pressure prediction of fluid responsiveness

    Evaluated before and after EEOT (within 1 minute from EEOT application)

  • Stroke volume prediction of fluid responsiveness

    Evaluated before and after EEOT (within 1 minute from EEOT application)

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Rate of failure of SIGH test

    During the test execution

  • Rate of failure of EEOT test

    During the test execution

Study Arms (1)

Intervention EEO_SIGH

EXPERIMENTAL

Single arm intervention. All the patients will receive the two tests (SIGH and EEOT) in 1:1 random sequence order

Diagnostic Test: SIGHDiagnostic Test: EEOTDiagnostic Test: Fluid challenge

Interventions

SIGHDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

To add the Sigh35 to PSV, the ventilator is set in pressure controlled synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation plus PSV \[SIMV (PC) + PS mode\], with SIMV rate set a 1/min and inspiratory time of 4 seconds. SIMV (PC) = 35 cmH20 of total inspiratory support (PEEP + PS).

Intervention EEO_SIGH
EEOTDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

• The EEOT is performed by interrupting the mechanical ventilation for 15 seconds, by using and end-expiratory hold on the ventilator. The ventilator trigger is set at 2 L/min.

Intervention EEO_SIGH
Fluid challengeDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Bolus of fluids of 4 ml/kg given within 10 minutes

Intervention EEO_SIGH

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may not qualify if:

  • left ventricular ejection fraction \<30% or severe valvular dysfunction
  • atrial fibrillation
  • severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
  • abdominal compartment syndrome
  • air leakage through chest drains
  • artifacts in arterial waveform
  • pathological respiratory patterns due to neurological diseases
  • signs of fatigue or respiratory distress

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Humanitas Research Hospital

Rozzano, Milano, 20089, Italy

RECRUITING

Humanitas Research Hospital

Rozzano, Milano, Italy

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Messina A, Colombo D, Barra FL, Cammarota G, De Mattei G, Longhini F, Romagnoli S, DellaCorte F, De Backer D, Cecconi M, Navalesi P. Sigh maneuver to enhance assessment of fluid responsiveness during pressure support ventilation. Crit Care. 2019 Jan 28;23(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2294-4.

    PMID: 30691523BACKGROUND
  • Patroniti N, Foti G, Cortinovis B, Maggioni E, Bigatello LM, Cereda M, Pesenti A. Sigh improves gas exchange and lung volume in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing pressure support ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2002 Apr;96(4):788-94. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200204000-00004.

    PMID: 11964584BACKGROUND
  • Monnet X, Osman D, Ridel C, Lamia B, Richard C, Teboul JL. Predicting volume responsiveness by using the end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):951-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181968fe1.

    PMID: 19237902BACKGROUND

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Cross-over design. The study has one single arm cross-over treatment design. The same patient will be assessed by means of the two tests. The sequence of application will be randomly generated and applied to the patients.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2021

First Posted

June 14, 2021

Study Start

February 1, 2022

Primary Completion

October 1, 2024

Study Completion

October 1, 2024

Last Updated

April 2, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Locations