Nylon Verus Polyglactin Corneal Suture in Pediatric Cataract Surgery
Comparison Between Nylon and Polyglactin Corneal Suture in Pediatric Cataract Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pediatric cataract surgery requires the suturing of the corneal incision in order to maintain the integrity of the eyeball and to help avoid the trauma often caused by scratching in the postoperative period of pediatric surgeries. Traditionally, this suturing is performed using 10-0 nylon material. Because this material is non-absorbable, it must be removed under sedation in cases of complications such as suture loosening, late suture lysis, accumulation of secretion on the suture, corneal neovascularization, and corneal ulceration. The objetive of this study is to compare the rate of postoperative complications and the need for suture removal after pediatric cataract surgery in cases in which nylon (non-absorbable) sutures are used versus cases in which polyglactin (absorbable) sutures are used. This is a controlled, randomized, prospective, single-center study performed on patients undergoing pediatric cataract surgery at the Clinical Hospital of the University of Campinas (UNICAMP). The volunteers for whom cataract extraction surgery has been indicated and who have signed the ICF (or whose ICF has been signed by a parent or guardian) will undergo cataract surgery and the cornea will be sutured using a polyglactin 910 suture (Vicryl® 10-0). In the control group (Group B), the cornea will be sutured using nylon 10-0 sutures (the current routine procedure). All patients will be monitored for six months and will receive complete ophthalmological evaluations in order to determine whether they experience any suture-related complications and whether sutures must be removed under sedation. A lower incidence of complications and a less frequent need for suture removal under sedation are expected in the group receiving Vicryl® sutures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 18, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2019
CompletedJanuary 25, 2019
January 1, 2019
8 months
January 18, 2019
January 23, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
frequency of complications associated with sutures in each group
frequency of complications associated with sutures in each group
180 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
need for suture removal under sedation in each group.
180 days
Study Arms (2)
Vicryl
EXPERIMENTALVicryl suture
Nylon
ACTIVE COMPARATORNylon suture
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients up to 14 years of age who are clinically qualified to undergo pediatric cataract surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Traumatic cataract with ocular perforation
- Cataract surgery associated with other procedures, such as glaucoma filtering surgery, vitreoretinal surgery, and cornea surgery
- Signs of ocular or periocular infection
- Advanced glaucoma
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mathias Violante Mélega
Campinas, São Paulo, 13025-050, Brazil
Related Publications (14)
Foster A, Gilbert C, Rahi J. Epidemiology of cataract in childhood: a global perspective. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23 Suppl 1:601-4. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(97)80040-5.
PMID: 9278811BACKGROUNDGilbert CE, Wood M, Waddel K, Foster A. Causes of childhood blindness in east Africa: results in 491 pupils attending 17 schools for the blind in Malawi, Kenya and Uganda. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1995 Jun;2(2):77-84. doi: 10.3109/09286589509057086.
PMID: 7585238BACKGROUNDHaargaard B, Wohlfahrt J, Fledelius HC, Rosenberg T, Melbye M. Incidence and cumulative risk of childhood cataract in a cohort of 2.6 million Danish children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 May;45(5):1316-20. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-0635.
PMID: 15111583BACKGROUNDWHO | Priority eye diseases. WHO [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2017 Dec 29]; Available from: http://www.who.int/blindness/causes/priority/en/index3.html
BACKGROUNDWilson BME. Pediatric Cataracts : Overview Classification ( Categorization ). 2016;
BACKGROUNDHeaven CJ, Boase DL. Suppurative keratitis with endophthalmitis due to biodegraded full thickness monofilament nylon corneal sutures. Eur J Implant Refract Surg [Internet]. 1993;5(3):164-8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80436-4
BACKGROUNDLee BJ, Smith SD, Jeng BH. Suture-related corneal infections after clear corneal cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 May;35(5):939-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.10.061.
PMID: 19393897BACKGROUNDCulbert RB, Devenyi RG. Bacterial endophthalmitis after suture removal. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999 May;25(5):725-7. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)00020-6.
PMID: 10330655BACKGROUNDKhurshid GS, Fahy GT. Endophthalmitis secondary to corneal sutures: series of delayed-onset keratitis requiring intravitreal antibiotics. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Jul;29(7):1370-2. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00404-8.
PMID: 12900247BACKGROUNDAcheson JF, Lyons CJ. Ocular morbidity due to monofilament nylon corneal sutures. Eye (Lond). 1991;5 ( Pt 1):106-12. doi: 10.1038/eye.1991.20. No abstract available.
PMID: 2060657BACKGROUNDDanjoux JP, Reck AC. Corneal sutures: is routine removal really necessary? Eye (Lond). 1994;8 ( Pt 3):339-42. doi: 10.1038/eye.1994.70.
PMID: 7958043BACKGROUNDBainbridge JW, Teimory M, Kirwan JF, Rostron CK. A prospective controlled study of a 10/0 absorbable polyglactin suture for corneal incision phacoemulsification. Eye (Lond). 1998;12 ( Pt 3a):399-402. doi: 10.1038/eye.1998.94.
PMID: 9775239BACKGROUNDBar-Sela SM, Spierer O, Spierer A. Suture-related complications after congenital cataract surgery: Vicryl versus Mersilene sutures. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Feb;33(2):301-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.10.039.
PMID: 17276274BACKGROUNDMelega MV, Dos Reis R, Lira RPC, de Oliveira DF, Arieta CEL, Alves M. Comparison Between Nylon and Polyglactin Sutures in Pediatric Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Aug 27;8:700793. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.700793. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34513873DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 18, 2019
First Posted
January 23, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 2019
Primary Completion
September 1, 2019
Study Completion
October 1, 2019
Last Updated
January 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share