The Comparison of Microbial Adherence to Various Sutures in Patients Undergoing Oral Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
30
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The final stage of any surgical procedure is suturing. Sutures have a vital rule in wound healing- they are responsible for flaps approximation, hemostasis and restoring function and esthetics. Choosing the right suture is crucial especially in oral sites because of its unique anatomical features: the presence of saliva and the patient's everyday function- swallowing, talking, eating etc. Sutures require certain physical properties such as tensile strength, dimensional stability, lack of memory, knot security and elasticity. One highly important quality is the ability to prevent or reduce bacterial adhesion and by that to prevent secondary infection. There are many kinds of sutures in the market- none of which contains all the ideal features. The aim of the study is to compare the amount of bacterial adhesion to different kinds of sutures in patients undergoing periodontal surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 7, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 13, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2017
CompletedJanuary 14, 2016
January 1, 2016
1 year
January 7, 2016
January 13, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
bacterial counts on blood agar plates from each suture will be quantified in CFU (colony-forming units) and expressed as total bacteria/suture
CFU from all four different sutures (silk, vicryl, nylon and polypropylene sutures) will be compared.
Outcome measure will be assessed 10 days after sample incubation for the different sutures obtained from each study participate
Study Arms (4)
silk suture
ACTIVE COMPARATORsilk suture
vicryl suture
ACTIVE COMPARATORvicryl suture
nylon suture
ACTIVE COMPARATORnylon suture
polypropylene suture
ACTIVE COMPARATORpolypropylene suture
Interventions
each treatment will include 4 types of suture (as described above). all subjects will receive the same types of sutures. treatment plan is NOT influenced by the suture material used.
each treatment will include 4 types of suture (as described above). all subjects will receive the same types of sutures. treatment plan is NOT influenced by the suture material used.
each treatment will include 4 types of suture (as described above). all subjects will receive the same types of sutures. treatment plan is NOT influenced by the suture material used.
each treatment will include 4 types of suture (as described above). all subjects will receive the same types of sutures. treatment plan is NOT influenced by the suture material used.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients designated for oral surgery with the possibility to perform at least 4 sutures, 5mm apart. The surgery will take place at the periodontology department, Dental faculty, Hadassah medical center.
- Patients willing to participate in the study and sign an informed concerned form
- Patients without systemic illness
You may not qualify if:
- Diabetes, heart disease, immune deficiency, thrombocytopenia\\ coagulation enzymes deficiency
- Chronic alcohol consumption\\ drug user
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (3)
Banche G, Roana J, Mandras N, Amasio M, Gallesio C, Allizond V, Angeretti A, Tullio V, Cuffini AM. Microbial adherence on various intraoral suture materials in patients undergoing dental surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Aug;65(8):1503-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.066.
PMID: 17656275RESULTSelvig KA, Biagiotti GR, Leknes KN, Wikesjo UM. Oral tissue reactions to suture materials. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1998 Oct;18(5):474-87.
PMID: 10093524RESULTGrigg TR, Liewehr FR, Patton WR, Buxton TB, McPherson JC. Effect of the wicking behavior of multifilament sutures. J Endod. 2004 Sep;30(9):649-52. doi: 10.1097/01.don.0000121617.67923.05.
PMID: 15329570RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dudu Polak, DMD
Department of Periodontology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 7, 2016
First Posted
January 13, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
January 1, 2017
Study Completion
May 1, 2017
Last Updated
January 14, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share