Comparison of Osteocentral Versus Locoregional Anesthesia in Case of Mandibular Molar Pulpitis
COQ
Comparison of the Variations of the Cardiovascular Parameters and the Efficiency of the Osteocentral Anesthesia (Quicksleeper™) and the Locoregional Anesthesia in the Case of Mandibular Pulpitis
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The irreversible acute pulpitis is the most common emergency at the hospital during dental consultation. Pulpitis are characterized by intense and spontaneous oro-facial pains. In case of mandibular molar, the emergency treatment consists in realizing a pulpotomy (eviction of cameral pulp) under locoregional anesthesia called inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). The latter represents a real challenge, since inflammation may decrease its action. To mitigate this deficiency and the drawbacks of the IANB (onset and duration of the anesthesia, bites risk reported with IANB) other anesthesias are proposed. In particular the computerized intraosseous technique anesthesia of which the Quicksleeper™ system is a part. However, according to the observers, a mild to severe tachycardia have been reported. Very few valid clinical trials exists on the subject, most being realized with systems of intraosseous anesthesia other than Quicksleeper™. Therefore, the aim of this study is first to analyze the variations of the cardiovascular parameters into two groups of anesthesia: locoregional anesthesia and Quicksleeper ™ system; and then, to compare the efficiency, side effects, operating consequences of both techniques. This study should provide better data about potential risk with computerized intraosseous technique such has Quicksleeper ™ system in healthy or cardiovascular risk patient.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 19, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 14, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 17, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 17, 2022
CompletedJune 28, 2022
June 1, 2022
3.3 years
December 19, 2018
June 27, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
time required (in minutes) to re-obtain the baseline cardiovascular parameters like reported before injection: expected event.
* 3 successive values of heart rate similar to those registered before injection. * 3 successive values of blood pressure (diastolic and systolic) similar to those registered before injection.
at day 0, from T0 minute to T14 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Compare the pain of the patient between the two anesthetic techniques
3 days
Compare the possible postoperative course between the 2 anesthetic techniques
3 days
Study Arms (2)
Computerized intraosseous technique (Quicksleeper™)
EXPERIMENTALpatients will receive the anesthetic solution with computerized intraosseous technique anesthesia near the tooth roots involved.
loco-regional anesthesia (IANB technique)
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients will receive the anesthetic solution with the loco-regional anesthesia technique: near the place where the nerve goes into the jaw, based on osteo muscular markers.
Interventions
The anesthetic solution is administered with a specific equipment allowing the injection step by step: * anesthesia of the interdental papilla, * positioning of the needle and perforating of the interdental space, * Injection of the solution. All of these steps are based on an adjustment of the different part of this equipment.
The anesthetic solution is delivered by a needle near to the inferior alveolar nerve before it enters the mandibular foramen.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- real irreversible pulpitis of a mandibular molar in dental emergency consultation at the Nantes hospital
- Healthy patient without medical history (ASA 1), without treatment for heart rate distress (anti arrhythmic, beta-blocking drug)
- Major and covered by the social security
- Informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- ASA \> 1
- Pregnant and breastfeeding women
- Minors
- Adults under guardianships
- Adults deprived of freedom
- Impossibility to obtain for informed consent
- Allergy to anesthetic components
- Contraindication of vasoconstrictor
- Angle closure glaucoma
- Pheochromocytomas
- Bisphosphonate IV
- Irradiated patient (upper respiratory and gastrointestinal tract cancer)
- Contraindication with Mono-amino oxidase inhibitors
- Acute apical periodontitis
- Pulpitis on wisdom teeth
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Nantes Universitary Hospital
Nantes, Loire-Atlantique, 44093, France
Related Publications (2)
Gaudin A, Clouet R, Boeffard C, Laham A, Martin H, Amador Del Valle G, Enkel B, Prud'homme T. Comparing intraosseous computerized anaesthesia with inferior alveolar nerve block in the treatment of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: A randomized controlled trial. Int Endod J. 2023 Aug;56(8):922-931. doi: 10.1111/iej.13935. Epub 2023 May 29.
PMID: 37209243DERIVEDLaham A, Clouet R, Del Valle GA, Gaudin A, Prud'homme T. Anaesthetic efficacy and influence on cardiovascular parameters change of intraosseous computerised anaesthesia versus inferior alveolar nerve block anaesthesia in acute irreversible pulpitis of mandibular molars: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2022 Dec 5;23(1):979. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06915-4.
PMID: 36471427DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 19, 2018
First Posted
January 14, 2019
Study Start
March 1, 2019
Primary Completion
June 17, 2022
Study Completion
June 17, 2022
Last Updated
June 28, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-06