NCT03796065

Brief Summary

The proposed study will employ a cross-cultural Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approach to build from prior needs assessments and mixed-methods research to evaluate the effectiveness of the Family Strengthening Intervention for Refugees (FSI-R), a preventative family home-based visiting intervention intended to mitigate mental health disparities among refugee children and families using a hybrid implementation-effectiveness design. Results of the investigator's trial will expand the evidence-base on community-based interventions for refugees and has the potential to be replicated to reduce mental health disparities affecting diverse groups of refugee children and families.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
354

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 27, 2018

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 3, 2019

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 8, 2019

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

February 8, 2023

Status Verified

February 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

January 3, 2019

Last Update Submit

February 6, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

refugeesparental self-efficacyfamily communicationfamily connectednessrefugee youthyouth functioningintegration

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Change in conflict via the Family Conflict Scale

    The Family Conflict Scale utilizes a 7-point Likert Scale (0-6) to assess family conflict within the past month. Higher scores reflect greater family conflict.

    T1 (Baseline), T2 (approximately 24-months post-baseline), T3 (6-months follow-up from T2)

  • Change in communication via the Revised Parent- Adolescent Communication Form

    Utilizes a 5-point Likert scale (1-5) to assess parent-child communication. Greater scores indicate higher communication between parents and their children.

    T1 (Baseline), T2 (approximately 24-months post-baseline), T3 (6-months follow-up from T2)

  • Change in family conflict via the Intergenerational Conflict Index

    Utilizes a 5-point Likert scale (1-5) to assess intergenerational congruence across several domains of the parent-child relationship. Higher scores denote greater intergenerational congruence.

    T1 (Baseline), T2 (approximately 24-months post-baseline), T3 (6-months follow-up from T2)

  • Change in parenting via the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire

    Likert scale (1-5) that includes 5 sub-domains. Each sub-domain results in a summed score that relates to 5 domains of parenting: involvement, positive parenting, poor monitoring/supervision, inconsistent discipline, and corporal punishment.

    T1 (Baseline), T2 (approximately 24-months post-baseline), T3 (6-months follow-up from T2)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in youth externalizing behaviors via the African Youth Psychosocial Assessment

    T1 (Baseline), T2 (approximately 24-months post-baseline), T3 (6-months follow-up from T2)

  • Change in youth depression via the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale

    T1 (Baseline), T2 (approximately 24-months post-baseline), T3 (6-months follow-up from T2)

Study Arms (2)

FSI-R Treatment

EXPERIMENTAL

Families randomized into the FSI-R Treatment arm will receive the 10-module Family Strengthening Intervention in addition to any outside services or programs they are participating in.

Behavioral: FSI-R Treatment

FSI-R Control

NO INTERVENTION

Families randomized into the FSI-R Control arm will not receive the FSI-R treatment. Instead, they will continue with their usual care, referred to as Treatment as Usual (TAU).

Interventions

FSI-R TreatmentBEHAVIORAL

The FSI-R involves a series of separate and joint meetings with parents and children to discuss challenges the family has faced and the strengths that helped them make it through past challenging times. Additional psychoeducation on mental health and promoting resilience along with coaching to enhance parenting skills is provided throughout and may be tailored to family needs. The FSI-R provides a shared space for refugee families both to recognize their strengths and to problem-solve in a more collective way on family challenges and shared hopes for the future. The FSI-R is delivered in the home, by a trained interventionist, over the course of 10-modules.

Also known as: Family Strengthening Intervention for Refugees
FSI-R Treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age7 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • being a resettled refugee family
  • having one or more school-aged children living in the home (aged 7-17)
  • be aged 18 or older
  • cares for and lives in the same household of the children at least 50% of the time
  • is the child'd legal guardian

You may not qualify if:

  • families in the midst of a crisis (e.g. active suicide attempts)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Maine Immigrant and Refugee Services

Lewiston, Maine, 04240, United States

Location

Jewish Family Service

Springfield, Massachusetts, 01108, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Jung E, Black C, Placencio-Castro M, Chamlagai L, Osman R, Hoffman M, Beardslee W, Betancourt TS. Delivering a family-based child mental health promotion program among two resettled refugee communities during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned in a hybrid type II implementation-effectiveness randomized controlled trial. Am J Community Psychol. 2025 Oct 5. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.70021. Online ahead of print.

Study Officials

  • Theresa Betancourt, ScD

    Boston College

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER
Masking Details
The Research Assistants (RAs) who will collect both qualitative and quantitative data will be blind to the condition in which study participants are randomized.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The investigators will conduct a Randomized Controlled Trial among Somali Bantu and Bhutanese families (N=300; 150 per group). Half of the families will be randomized to receive the FSI-R and half will be randomized to the control condition where the participants will receive Treatment as Usual (TAU).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2019

First Posted

January 8, 2019

Study Start

August 27, 2018

Primary Completion

June 30, 2022

Study Completion

June 30, 2022

Last Updated

February 8, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-02

Locations