Impact of Nasoseptal Flap Harvest Technique on Olfaction Following Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pituitary tumours have an estimated prevalence of 20% in the general population and the number of clinically relevant pituitary adenomas is increasing with time. When symptomatic, the standard of care required for pituitary adenomas is resection through an endoscopic transsphenoidal approach. There is however significant olfactory dysfunction following endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery with approximately 23% of patients reporting some degree of worsening in their sense of smell in the postoperative period. Pedicled nasoseptal flaps are used to repair skull base defects following resection of skull base tumours. The superior incision is placed in close proximity to olfactory mucosa. Currently, these flaps are raised either with the use of electrocautery or scalpel. The use of electrocautery in surgery has provided surgeons with greater hemostasis when compared to a scalpel. This is of utmost importance in many regions of the head \& neck where highly vascularized tissue results in difficulties achieving adequate hemostasis and therefore limiting view of the surgical field. However, the use of electrocautery increases thermal damage to surrounding tissue and impairs wound healing when compared to a scalpel. Although the transmission of thermal energy via electrocautery to adjacent mucosa containing olfactory epithelium may theoretically contribute to olfactory disturbances, no prospective randomized controlled trials have yet examined the impact of these two different techniques on postoperative olfactory function. The purpose of this research study is to determine the effects, if any, of electrocautery versus scalpel on olfaction in raising the nasoseptal flap for repairing skull base defects following transphenoidal surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 19, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 12, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 25, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2019
CompletedMarch 15, 2019
March 1, 2019
8 months
August 19, 2018
March 13, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Change in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)
Standardized and validated test of olfaction, which uses microencapsulated odorants released by scratching test booklets. Participants are asked to fill out forced choice multiple alternative questionnaires regarding each odorant. Minimum total score 0, maximum total score 40. Higher scores represent a better outcome.
Initial visit and at 1, 3 and 6-month follow-up visits
Change in Sniffin' Sticks
Validated 16-item odor identification test. Minimum total score 0, maximum total score 16. Higher scores represent better outcome.
Initial visit and at 1, 3 and 6-month follow-up visits
Change in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22)
Disease-specific, quality-of-life related measure of sinonasal function. Test consists of 22 symptoms requiring responders to rate severity on a 5-point Likert scale 0-5. Minimum score 0, maximum score 110. Higher scores correlate with greater rhinosinusitus-related health burden.
Initial visit and at 1, 3 and 6-month follow-up visits
Change in Skull Base Inventory (SBI)
Multidimensional, disease-specific instrument designed to measure quality of life of patients who undergo surgical treatment for anterior or central skull base pathologies. It covers several disease-specific domains including cognitive, endocrine, nasal, neurologic, visual, and other general areas.Each item is weighted equally in each domain score. Each domain is weighted equally in the overall score. Domain scores are calculated by taking the total score (sum of all items) in that domain divided by the maximum possible score for that domain multiplied by 100. The minimum score for each domain is 0 and the maximum is 100. The minimum score for the questionnaire is 0 and the maximum is 100. Higher score indicates better outcomes.
Initial visit and at 1, 3 and 6-month follow-up visits
Change in Pre-Op and Post-Op Endoscopy Scores
Used to quantify the pathological states of the nose and paranasal sinuses. Calculated on left and right side out, minimum 0, maximum 14. Higher scores indicate objectively worse sinonasal inflammation.
Initial visit and at 1, 3 and 6-month follow-up visits
Study Arms (2)
Electrocautery group
ACTIVE COMPARATORElectrocautery used to raise pediclued nasoseptal flaps to repair skull based defects following endoscopic transphenoidal surgery.
Scalpel group
ACTIVE COMPARATORScalpel used to raise pediclued nasoseptal flaps to repair skull based defects following endoscopic transphenoidal surgery.
Interventions
Electrocautery versus scalpel in the elevation of nasoseptal flaps following endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients (age ≥18 years)
- Patients with tumours of the pituitary gland electively scheduled for endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery with nasoseptal flap coverage
You may not qualify if:
- Documented evidence of sinonasal disease on either nasal endoscopy or radiography
- Patients with a clinical history of asthma and/or sinonasal disease
- Previous sinus surgery
- Previous skull base surgery
- History of pre-existing hyposmia or anosmia
- Use of medication(s) known to alter sense of smell at time of test
- UPSIT scores \<5 indicating a functional component to alteration in olfaction
- Development of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak necessitating re-entry into the operative field containing the nasoseptal flap
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Lee, MD
Unity Health Toronto
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head, Division of Rhinology, Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 19, 2018
First Posted
December 12, 2018
Study Start
February 25, 2019
Primary Completion
October 31, 2019
Study Completion
December 31, 2019
Last Updated
March 15, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03