Nasal Packing Following Endoscopic Endonasal Pituitary Resection
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There is considerable controversy about the use of nasal packing following endoscopic endonasal resection of pituitary tumors as a necessary treatment amongst Rhinology-Skull Base Surgeons. The justification for the routine use of nasal packing following pituitary surgery is not clear as this practice is not used for equally extensive sinus surgery. Further scientific evidence supporting this practice is lacking, and a recent survey of Canadian surgeons performing this surgery demonstrates clear division in practice for the routine use of nasal packing. Nasal packing causes patients significant discomfort requiring medication, and the use of packing adds direct and unintended hospitalization and health system costs for every case for which it is used. The benefits, short-comings, and associated costs of nasal packing following endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary resection have not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To determine if nasal packing following endoscopic endonasal pituitary tumor surgery is a necessary treatment. The principal research questions for this study, our internal pilot of the RCT, pertain to feasibility of enrolment of patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary tumor surgery using the full RCT protocol of nasal packing versus no nasal packing. The pilot will address feasibility of site-specific enrolment and feasibility of institutional ethics approval and protocol administration.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 6, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 20, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 24, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 24, 2024
CompletedDecember 13, 2024
December 1, 2024
5.3 years
July 6, 2018
December 9, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Anterior Skull Basal Nasal Inventory-12 (ASK-12)
The ASK-12 is a validated patient reported nasal QOL questionnaire that evaluates morbidity after endonasal skull base surgery. Twelve symptoms related to nasal health are scored 0-5 and a global score is the mean value. Lower scores reflect better sinonasal quality of life.
Post Op Day 0, 1, 2, 3 and Post-Op weeks 2 and 4
Incidence of sinonasal adverse events
Evaluated by comparing the proportion of patients in each group who develop any sinonasal adverse events ( epistaxis, sinusitis, synechia, CSF rhinorrhea, nasal septal perforation
Post Op Day 0, 1, 2, 3 and Post-Op weeks 2 and 4
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in EuroQual-5Dimension (EQ-5D)
Post Op Day 0, 1, 2, 3 and Post-Op weeks 2 and 4
Cost Analysis
Through study completion, 1 year.
Change in Analgesic and Antibiotic Usage
Post Op Day 0, 1, 2, 3 and Post-Op weeks 2 and 4
Post operative pain
Post Op Day 0, 1, 2, 3 and Post-Op weeks 2 and 4
Study Arms (2)
Nasal Packing
ACTIVE COMPARATORNasal packing will be placed at the end of surgery.
No Nasal Packing
EXPERIMENTALNo nasal packing will be placed during or after the surgery.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older
- undergoing endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to pituitary resection for pituitary tumors of any pathology for the first time
You may not qualify if:
- patients who do not have a working understanding of English
- patients with known allergy to Merocel nasal packing
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shaun Kilty, MD
The Ottawa Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, FRCSC
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 6, 2018
First Posted
September 19, 2018
Study Start
January 20, 2019
Primary Completion
April 24, 2024
Study Completion
April 24, 2024
Last Updated
December 13, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share