IV or IV/PO Omadacycline vs. IV/PO Levofloxacin for the Treatment of Acute Pyelonephritis
A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Adaptive Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of iv or iv/po Omadacycline and iv/po Levofloxacin in the Treatment of Adults With Acute Pyelonephritis.
1 other identifier
interventional
201
4 countries
31
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous (iv) or iv/per oral (po) omadacycline as compared to iv or iv/po levofloxacin in the treatment of female adults with acute pyelonephritis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Nov 2018
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
31 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 19, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 27, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 28, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 26, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 24, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 7, 2020
CompletedJuly 7, 2020
July 1, 2020
7 months
November 27, 2018
June 8, 2020
July 2, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Number of Participants With an Investigator Assessment of Clinical Response at the Post Therapy Evaluation (PTE) Visit (ITT Population)
Clinical response was determined by the investigator at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the clinical outcome of Clinical Success, Clinical Failure, or Indeterminate. Clinical Success was defined as the complete resolution or significant improvement of the baseline AP signs and symptoms at the PTE visit such that no additional antimicrobial therapy is required for the current infection. Clinical Failure was defined as no apparent response to therapy or persistence of signs and symptoms of infection or reappearance of signs and symptoms at or before the PTE visit such that use of additional systemic antimicrobial therapy for the current infection was required or death at or before the PTE visit. The clinical outcome was deemed as Indeterminate when the PTE visit was not completed.
Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).
Number of Participants With a Microbiological Response at the PTE Visit (Micro-ITT Population)
Microbiological response was determined programmatically at the PTE visit by assessing whether or not the participant met the microbiological outcome of 'Success', 'Failure', or 'Indeterminate'. Participants were considered to have a microbiological response of 'Success' if the outcomes of each baseline pathogens were eradication at the PTE visit. Participants were considered to have a microbiological response of 'Failure' if the outcome for any pathogen was persistence. Participants were considered to have a microbiological response of 'Indeterminate', if the outcome of at least 1 baseline pathogen was indeterminate and there was no outcome of persistence for any baseline pathogen.
Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).
Number of Participants With Resolution of All AP Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)
Participants recorded their assessments using the Modified Patient Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (mPSAQ), a 6-item questionnaire that assessed the levels of 'severity' and 'bothersomeness' for six pyelonephritis signs and symptoms. The sub-scale responses were recorded as 'did not have', 'mild', 'moderate', and 'severe' for 'severity'; and 'not at all', 'a little', 'moderately', and 'a lot' for 'bothersomeness', both scored 0-3. Total scores were calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the 6 items, divided by the number of non-missing items, and then multiplied by 6. For each sub-scale, the total score ranged from 0 (least Severe/ least bothersome) and 18 (worst severity/most bothersome). Number of participants with resolution of all symptoms, without occurrence of new symptoms is reported. Resolution was defined as absence of all baseline symptoms.
Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).
Number of Participants With No Worsening and Absence of New AP Signs and Clinical Symptoms at PTE Visit (ITT Population)
Participants recorded their assessments using the mPSAQ, a 6-item questionnaire that assessed the levels of 'severity' and 'bothersomeness' for six pyelonephritis signs and symptoms. The sub-scale responses were recorded as 'did not have', 'mild', 'moderate', and 'severe' for 'severity'; and 'not at all', 'a little', 'moderately', and 'a lot' for 'bothersomeness', both scored 0-3. Total scores were calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the 6 items, divided by the number of non-missing items, and then multiplied by 6. For each sub-scale, the total score ranged from 0 (least Severe/ least bothersome) and 18 (worst severity/most bothersome). Number of participants with no worsening and absence of AP signs and clinical symptoms is reported. No worsening meant that each question score is same or better at post baseline.
Day 21 (A PTE occurred on Day 21 ± 2 days after the participant's first dose of study drug).
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
up to approximately 28 days
Study Arms (5)
Omadacycline 200 iv/200 iv
EXPERIMENTALOn Day 1, participants received omadacycline 200 milligrams intravenously (iv). On Days 2 through 7, participants continued to receive omadacycline 200 milligrams iv. All doses were administered once-per-day and iv doses were administered in 150 milliliters of normal saline as continuous infusions over 90 minutes.
Omadacycline 200 iv/100 iv
EXPERIMENTALOn Day 1, participants received omadacycline 200 milligrams iv. On Days 2 through 7, participants received omadacycline 100 milligrams iv. All doses were administered once-per-day and iv doses were administered in 150 milliliters of normal saline as continuous infusions over 90 minutes.
Omadacycline 200 iv/300 po or 100 iv
EXPERIMENTALOn Day 1, participants received omadacycline 200 milligrams iv. On Days 2 through 7, participants received omadacycline 100 milligrams iv or omadacycline 300 milligrams per oral (po). All doses were administered once-per-day and iv doses were administered in 150 milliliters of normal saline as continuous infusions over 90 minutes. All oral doses were taken in a fasted state.
Omadacycline 200 iv/450 po or 100 iv
EXPERIMENTALOn Day 1, participants received omadacycline 200 milligrams iv. On Days 2 through 7, participants received omadacycline 100 milligrams iv or omadacycline 450 milligrams po. All doses were administered once-per-day and iv doses were administered in 150 milliliters of normal saline as continuous infusions over 90 minutes. All oral doses were taken in a fasted state.
Levofloxacin 750 iv/750 po or iv
ACTIVE COMPARATOROn Day 1, participants received levofloxacin 750 milligrams iv. On Days 2 through 7, participants received levofloxacin 750 milligrams iv or levofloxacin 750 milligrams po. All doses were administered once-per-day and iv doses were administered in 150 milliliters of normal saline as continuous infusions over 90 minutes. All oral doses were taken in a fasted state.
Interventions
po tablets
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female participants, age 18-65 years who have signed the informed consent form
- Must have a qualifying acute pyelonephritis
- Participants must not be pregnant at the time of enrollment
- Must agree to a reliable method of birth control during the study and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug
- Must be able to comply with all of the requirements of the study
You may not qualify if:
- Males
- Symptoms of acute pyelonephritis present for longer 7 days prior to randomization
- Infections that require antibacterial treatment for greater than 14 days
- Evidence of suspected non-renal source of infections, vaginitis, or sexually transmitted infection
- Evidence of significant immunological disease
- Evidence of liver impairment or disease
- Evidence of unstable cardiac disease
- Severe renal disease or requirement for dialysis
- Evidence of septic shock
- Has a history of hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any tetracycline or to levofloxacin
- Has received an investigational drug within the past 30 days
- Participants who are pregnant or nursing
- Unable or unwilling to comply with the protocol requirements
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (31)
Site 201
Tbilisi, Georgia
Site 202
Tbilisi, Georgia
Site 203
Tbilisi, Georgia
Site 204
Tbilisi, Georgia
Site 301
Daugavpils, Latvia
Site 304
Liepāja, LV-3414, Latvia
Site 305
Rēzekne, Latvia
Site 302
Riga, Latvia
Site 303
Valmiera, Latvia
Site 409
Krasnoyarsk, 660062, Russia
Site 408
Moscow, 141435, Russia
Site 410
Moscow, Moscow, Russia
Site 415
Penza, 440026, Russia
Site 407
Rostov-on-Don, 344022, Russia
Site 405
Rostov-on-Don, 344037, Russia
Site 411
Saint Petersburg, 194291, Russia
Site 406
Saint Petersburg, 195067, Russia
Site 402
Saint Petersburg, 196247, Russia
Site 412
Saint Petersburg, 197022, Russia
Site 403
Saint Petersburg, 197374, Russia
Site 414
Saint Petersburg, 198205, Russia
Site 401
Saint Petersburg, 198412, Russia
Site 404
Saint Petersburg, 199106, Russia
Site 413
Smolensk, 214018, Russia
Site 502
Chernivtsi, 58001, Ukraine
Site 506
Dnipro, 49005, Ukraine
Site 505
Kharkiv, 61037, Ukraine
Site 504
Kyiv, 2660, Ukraine
Site 503
Kyiv, 4053, Ukraine
Site 501
Lviv, 79059, Ukraine
Site 507
Zaporizhzhia, 69600, Ukraine
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
In May 2019, the DMC modified the randomization algorithm based on their review of the data. After this change, participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the omadacycline 200 iv/200 iv or levofloxacin arms.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Paratek Medical Information
- Organization
- Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 27, 2018
First Posted
November 28, 2018
Study Start
November 19, 2018
Primary Completion
June 26, 2019
Study Completion
July 24, 2019
Last Updated
July 7, 2020
Results First Posted
July 7, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07