NCT04686318

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP), serum procalcitonin (PCT) and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) in the initial investigation of patients hospitalized with suspected acute pyelonephritis (APN).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
229

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 22, 2020

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 28, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2021

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 28, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

September 14, 2022

Status Verified

September 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

December 22, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 13, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

C-reactive proteinserum procalcitoninsoluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptordiagnostic and prognostic markersemergency department

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Verified and non verified acute pyelonephritis (APN)

    The decision of whether patients admitted with suspicion of APN actually has a final diagnosis of APN is based on a combination of all findings during admission. The verification of diagnosis requires human handling, interpretation and judgment. Therefore, in this study, an expert panel will define the reference standard for the diagnosis APN. The expert panel consists of two independent consultants from the emergency department with significant experience in emergency medicine and acute infections. They will individually determine whether or not the patient admitted suspected with APN actually had this diagnosis. The final diagnosis will be based on all available relevant information from the patient medical record including MRI of the kidneys. A standardized template will be used. Disagreement will be discussed until a consensus is reached.

    2 months after patient discharge

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Intensive care unit treatment

    within 60 days from admission to the emergency department

  • Length of stay

    within 60 days from current admission to the emergency department

  • The number of participants who died within 30 days

    within 30 days from arrival day

  • The number of participants who died within 90 days

    within 90 days from arrival to emergency department

  • Readmission

    within 30 days from day of discharge

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Bacteriuria

    urine collected within 4 hours of arrival to the emergency department

Study Arms (1)

suspected acute pyelonephritis

All patients admitted to the emergency department with suspected acute pyelonephritis assessed by the receiving physician

Diagnostic Test: Biomarkers for acute pyelonephritis

Interventions

Blood samples will be collected by a medical laboratory technologist and transferred to the local laboratory for analysis of CRP, PCT and suPAR. Laboratory staff will be blinded to participant diagnosis and outcome. CRP and PCT results will be available to the treating physician, but the suPAR result will not be available. * Diagnostic test of CRP. CRP will be measured using an immunoturbidimetric assay (Tina-quant®, Roche) on Roche/Hitachi Cobas© systems. * Diagnostic test of PCT: Plasma PCT will be quantified by an automated sandwich immunoassay "ECLIA" (Elecsys®, BRAHMS PCT-analyses) on Cobas© within two hours from collection according to standard procedure. * Diagnostic test of suPAR: Plasma suPAR will be quantified by using the commercial available suPARnostic© Tubilatex assay reagents (ViroGates, Denmark) on Cobas© as previously validated (35). Separated plasma is kept refrigerated and analysed for suPAR within 48 hours after collection.

suspected acute pyelonephritis

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Acutely admitted patients with suspected Acute pyelonephritis (APN) from three emergency departments (EDs) in the Region of Southern Denmark (Hospital Sønderjylland, Hospital Lillebælt, Odense University Hospital)

You may qualify if:

  • Suspicion of APN assessed by the receiving physician at the ED

You may not qualify if:

  • If the attending physician considers that participation will delay a life-saving treatment or patient needs direct transfer to the intensive care unit.
  • Admission within the last 14 days
  • Verified COVID-19 disease within 14 days before admission
  • Pregnant women
  • Severe immunodeficiencies: Primary immunodeficiencies and secondary immunodeficiencies (HIV positive CD4 \<200, Patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment (ATC L04A), Corticosteroid treatment (\>20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent for \>14 days within the last 30 days), Chemotherapy within 30 days)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital of Southern Jutland

Aabenraa, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Hamie L, Daoud G, Nemer G, Nammour T, El Chediak A, Uthman IW, Kibbi AG, Eid A, Kurban M. SuPAR, an emerging biomarker in kidney and inflammatory diseases. Postgrad Med J. 2018 Sep;94(1115):517-524. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-135839. Epub 2018 Sep 3.

    PMID: 30177549BACKGROUND
  • Schuetz P, Christ-Crain M, Muller B. Procalcitonin and other biomarkers to improve assessment and antibiotic stewardship in infections--hope for hype? Swiss Med Wkly. 2009 Jun 13;139(23-24):318-26. doi: 10.4414/smw.2009.12584.

    PMID: 19529989BACKGROUND
  • Skjot-Arkil H, Heltborg A, Lorentzen MH, Cartuliares MB, Hertz MA, Graumann O, Rosenvinge FS, Petersen ERB, Ostergaard C, Laursen CB, Skovsted TA, Posth S, Chen M, Mogensen CB. Improved diagnostics of infectious diseases in emergency departments: a protocol of a multifaceted multicentre diagnostic study. BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 30;11(9):e049606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049606.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DiseaseEmergencies

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsDisease Attributes

Study Officials

  • Christian Backer Mogensen

    Hospital of Southern Jutland

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2020

First Posted

December 28, 2020

Study Start

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion

February 28, 2022

Study Completion

June 1, 2022

Last Updated

September 14, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations