Evaluation of Optical Coherence Tomography in Dentistry
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a medical diagnostic tool, providing non-invasive, non-radiative and high resolution imaging. OCT has been established since many years in ophthalmology. In dentistry the diagnostic potential of OCT is currently increasingly being noticed. This clinical study includes two individual trials: (i) Longitudinal assessment of surface sealant thickness using optical coherence tomography and (ii) comparison of crevicular fluid levels of inflammatory cytokines after the application of surface sealants.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 20, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 4, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 26, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
ExpectedNovember 28, 2018
November 1, 2018
1.7 years
April 20, 2016
November 26, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Abrasion behaviour of orthodontic surface sealants
Longitudinal assesment of surface sealant thickness using optical coherence tomography
The thickness changes of the orthodontic surface sealants and the development of enamel demineralization will be monitored at the day of the application and five additional time points (t1= 1 month, t2= 3 months, t3= 6 months, t4=9 months, t5= 12 months)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Adverse effects of orthodontic surface sealants
To assess cytokine levels GCF will be sampled at the day of bracket bonding prior (t0) and at three additional time points (t1= 30 min, t2= 60 min, t3= 90 min) after the application of surface sealants or the bonding primer, respectively.
Study Arms (4)
Transbond XT
ACTIVE COMPARATORApplication of different orthodontic surface sealants to participants: Randomly assigned quadrants in this arm will receive a bonding primer (Transbond XT) The investigators will evaluate in this arm 1. the development of demineralization 2. its adverse effects after application
Protecto®CaF2Nano
EXPERIMENTALApplication of different orthodontic surface sealants to participants: Randomly assigned quadrants in this arm will receive an orthodontic surface sealant (Protecto®CaF2Nano). The investigators will evaluate in this arm 1. its abrasion behavior and the development of demineralization 2. its adverse effects after the application
Pro Seal®
EXPERIMENTALApplication of different orthodontic surface sealants to participants: Randomly assigned quadrants in this arm will receive an orthodontic surface sealant (Pro Seal®). The investigators will evaluate in this arm 1. its abrasion behavior and the development of demineralization 2. its adverse effects after the application
Opal® Seal
EXPERIMENTALApplication of different orthodontic surface sealants to participants: Randomly assigned quadrants in this arm will receive an orthodontic surface sealant (Opal®Seal). The investigators will evaluate in this arm 1. its abrasion behavior and the development of demineralization 2. its adverse effects after the application
Interventions
Application of • Transbond XT (activator comparator) to labial surfaces of teeth of randomized quadrants.
Application of • Protecto®CaF2Nano (orthodontic surface sealant) to labial surfaces of teeth of randomized quadrants.
Application of • Protecto®CaF2Nano (orthodontic surface sealant) to labial surfaces of teeth of randomized quadrants.
Application of • Opal®Seal (orthodontic surface sealant) to labial surfaces of teeth of randomized quadrants.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Orthodontic treatment need
- Informed consent from all patients and their parents or legal guardians after explaining of the study
You may not qualify if:
- withdrawn consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, University of Heidelberg
Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
Related Publications (8)
Alsayed EZ, Hariri I, Sadr A, Nakashima S, Bakhsh TA, Shimada Y, Sumi Y, Tagami J. Optical coherence tomography for evaluation of enamel and protective coatings. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(1):98-107. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2014-215.
PMID: 25748465RESULTLevin SM. Portasystemic shunts for portal hypertension: early and late results in a personal series of 140 operations. Vasc Surg. 1974 Jan-Feb;8(1):20-5. No abstract available.
PMID: 4544493RESULTRyf S, Flury S, Palaniappan S, Lussi A, van Meerbeek B, Zimmerli B. Enamel loss and adhesive remnants following bracket removal and various clean-up procedures in vitro. Eur J Orthod. 2012 Feb;34(1):25-32. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq128. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
PMID: 21228118RESULTLee SH, Lee JJ, Chung HJ, Park JT, Kim HJ. Dental optical coherence tomography: new potential diagnostic system for cracked-tooth syndrome. Surg Radiol Anat. 2016 Jan;38(1):49-54. doi: 10.1007/s00276-015-1514-8. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
PMID: 26168856RESULTLeao Filho JC, Braz AK, de Araujo RE, Tanaka OM, Pithon MM. Enamel Quality after Debonding: Evaluation by Optical Coherence Tomography. Braz Dent J. 2015 Jul-Aug;26(4):384-9. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201300406.
PMID: 26312977RESULTZingler S, Sommer A, Sen S, Saure D, Langer J, Guillon O, Lux CJ. Efficiency of powered systems for interproximal enamel reduction (IER) and enamel roughness before and after polishing-an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Jun;20(5):933-42. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1585-2. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
PMID: 26419674RESULTSen S, Erber R, Orhan G, Zingler S, Lux CJ. OCT evaluation of orthodontic surface sealants: a 12-month follow-up randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Mar;25(3):1547-1558. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03462-7. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
PMID: 32789656DERIVEDDeurer N, Erber R, Orhan G, Zingler S, Lux CJ, Sen S. Abrasion of Pro Seal(R) and Opal(R) Seal by professional tooth cleaning protocols: results from an in vitro study and a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2020 Dec 2;42(6):596-604. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz096.
PMID: 31765473DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sinan Sen, Dr.
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, University of Heidelberg
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Teaching and Research Assistant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2016
First Posted
November 26, 2018
Study Start
December 4, 2017
Primary Completion
August 1, 2019
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
November 28, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share