Effectiveness of the Intraligamentary Anesthesia and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block on Pain During Dental Treatment
Randomized Clinical Trial on the Effectiveness of the Intraligamentary Anesthesia and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block on Pain During Dental Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objective: To compare the effectiveness and complications of intraligamentary anesthesia (ILA) with conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) during injection and dental treatment of mandibular posterior teeth. Materials and Methods: In this randomized, prospective clinical trial, 72 patients (39 males, 33 females) patients scheduled for dental treatment of mandibular posterior teeth, were randomly allocated to ILA group (n=35) received ILA injection or IANB group (n=37) received the conventional IANB. Our primary outcome was to assess pain during the injection as well as pain and stress (discomfort) during dental treatment, using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain, 10= the worst pain imaginable). Whereas; recording 24 hours postoperative complications were our Secondary outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 24, 2020
CompletedSeptember 24, 2020
September 1, 2020
3 months
September 11, 2020
September 18, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
The intensity of pain during the injection
The intensity of pain during the injection of the LA to be assessed by the patient using Numeric Rating Scale. The Numeric Rating Scale, (NRS 0-10; 0 representing no pain at all and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable) is a valid instrument to measure pain.
immediately after the injection of LA
The intensity of pain during the dental treatment
The intensity of pain during the dental treatment to be assessed by the patient using Numeric Rating Scale. The Numeric Rating Scale, (NRS 0-10; 0 representing no pain at all and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable) is a valid instrument to measure pain.
immediately after the dental treatment
The intensity of stress (discomfort)
The intensity of stress during the dental treatment to be assessed by the patient using Numeric Rating Scale. The Numeric Rating Scale, (NRS 0-10; 0 representing no discomfortable at all and 10 representing the maximal discomfortable very imaginable) is a valid instrument to measure stress (discomfort)
immediately after the dental treatment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative complications
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB)
ACTIVE COMPARATOR37 patients received Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block (IANB) for dental treatment of mandibular posterior teeth.
Intraligamentary Anesthesia (ILA)
EXPERIMENTAL35 patients received Intraligamentary Anesthesia (ILA) for dental treatment of mandibular posterior teeth.
Interventions
The patients were anesthetized with two different local anaesthetic techniques.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients requiring regular dental in permanent mandibular posterior teeth under local anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a clinical or radiographic sign of acute abscess, pus or peri-radicular pathology
- Patients with a systemic disease requiring special considerations during their dental treatment
- Patients with contra-indications for any of the components of the anesthetic solution (allergy to articaine, epinephrine, and sulfite)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Medicine of Greifswald
Greifswald, 17487, Germany
Related Publications (20)
Pradhan R, Kulkarni D, Shetty L. Evaluation of Efficacy of Intraligamentary Injection Technique for Extraction of Mandibular Teeth-A Prospective Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jan;11(1):ZC110-ZC113. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/22204.9302. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
PMID: 28274058RESULTWilliamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x.
PMID: 16000093RESULTSiegel K, Schrimshaw EW, Kunzel C, Wolfson NH, Moon-Howard J, Moats HL, Mitchell DA. Types of dental fear as barriers to dental care among African American adults with oral health symptoms in Harlem. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012 Aug;23(3):1294-309. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0088.
PMID: 24212175RESULTBahl R. Local anesthesia in dentistry. Anesth Prog. 2004;51(4):138-42. No abstract available.
PMID: 15675263RESULTShabazfar N, Daublander M, Al-Nawas B, Kammerer PW. Periodontal intraligament injection as alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block--meta-analysis of the literature from 1979 to 2012. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(2):351-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1113-1. Epub 2013 Sep 29.
PMID: 24077785RESULTKaufman E, Weinstein P, Milgrom P. Difficulties in achieving local anesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc. 1984 Feb;108(2):205-8. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1984.0470. No abstract available.
PMID: 6584494RESULTPogrel MA. Permanent nerve damage from inferior alveolar nerve blocks--an update to include articaine. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2007 Apr;35(4):271-3.
PMID: 17612365RESULTMarniemi J, Parkki MG. Radiochemical assay of glutathione S-epoxide transferase and its enhancement by phenobarbital in rat liver in vivo. Biochem Pharmacol. 1975 Sep 1;24(17):1569-72. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(75)90080-5. No abstract available.
PMID: 9RESULTKämmerer PW, Palarie V, Schiegnitz E, Ziebart T, Al-Nawas B, Daubländer M. Clinical and histological comparison of pulp anesthesia and local diffusion after periodontal ligament injection and intrapapillary infiltration anaesthesia. J Pain Relief. 2012;1(10.4172):2167-0846.
RESULTWalton RE, Garnick JJ. The periodontal ligament injection: histologic effects on the periodontium in monkeys. J Endod. 1982 Jan;8(1):22-6. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(82)80312-9. No abstract available.
PMID: 6948904RESULTDreyer WP, van Heerden JD, de V Joubert JJ. The route of periodontal ligament injection of local anesthetic solution. J Endod. 1983 Nov;9(11):471-4. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80161-7. No abstract available.
PMID: 6586974RESULTKammerer PW, Adubae A, Buttchereit I, Thiem DGE, Daublander M, Frerich B. Prospective clinical study comparing intraligamentary anesthesia and inferior alveolar nerve block for extraction of posterior mandibular teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1469-1475. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2248-2. Epub 2017 Oct 15.
PMID: 29034443RESULTMeechan JG. Intraligamentary anaesthesia. J Dent. 1992 Dec;20(6):325-32. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(92)90018-8.
PMID: 1452871RESULTEndo T, Gabka J, Taubenheim L. Intraligamentary anesthesia: benefits and limitations. Quintessence Int. 2008 Jan 1;39(1):e15-25.
PMID: 18551207RESULTKammerer PW, Schiegnitz E, von Haussen T, Shabazfar N, Kammerer P, Willershausen B, Al-Nawas B, Daublander M. Clinical efficacy of a computerised device (STA) and a pressure syringe (VarioJect INTRA) for intraligamentary anaesthesia. Eur J Dent Educ. 2015 Feb;19(1):16-22. doi: 10.1111/eje.12096. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
PMID: 24646115RESULTReed KL, Malamed SF, Fonner AM. Local anesthesia part 2: technical considerations. Anesth Prog. 2012 Fall;59(3):127-36; quiz 137. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-59.3.127.
PMID: 23050753RESULTDumbrigue HB, Lim MV, Rudman RA, Serraon A. A comparative study of anesthetic techniques for mandibular dental extraction. Am J Dent. 1997 Dec;10(6):275-8.
PMID: 9590915RESULTPrama R, Padhye L, Pawar H, Rajput N. Efficacy of Intraligamentary Injections as a Primary Anesthetic Technique for mandibular molars & a comparison with inferior alveolar nerve block. Indian Journal of Multidisciplinary Dentistry. 2013 Aug 1;3(4).
RESULTMalamed SF. Handbook of local anesthesia. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2004 Jun 8.
RESULTYoussef BR, Sohnel A, Welk A, Abudrya MH, Baider M, Alkilzy M, Splieth C. RCT on the effectiveness of the intraligamentary anesthesia and inferior alveolar nerve block on pain during dental treatment. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Aug;25(8):4825-4832. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03787-x. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
PMID: 33527192DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Christian splieth, PHD
University Medicine of Greifswald
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2020
First Posted
September 24, 2020
Study Start
December 1, 2018
Primary Completion
March 1, 2019
Study Completion
June 15, 2019
Last Updated
September 24, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share