NCT04563351

Brief Summary

Objective: To compare the effectiveness and complications of intraligamentary anesthesia (ILA) with conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) during injection and dental treatment of mandibular posterior teeth. Materials and Methods: In this randomized, prospective clinical trial, 72 patients (39 males, 33 females) patients scheduled for dental treatment of mandibular posterior teeth, were randomly allocated to ILA group (n=35) received ILA injection or IANB group (n=37) received the conventional IANB. Our primary outcome was to assess pain during the injection as well as pain and stress (discomfort) during dental treatment, using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain, 10= the worst pain imaginable). Whereas; recording 24 hours postoperative complications were our Secondary outcomes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
72

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 15, 2019

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 11, 2020

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 24, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

September 24, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

September 11, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 18, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

local anestheticdentistrypaintechniques

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • The intensity of pain during the injection

    The intensity of pain during the injection of the LA to be assessed by the patient using Numeric Rating Scale. The Numeric Rating Scale, (NRS 0-10; 0 representing no pain at all and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable) is a valid instrument to measure pain.

    immediately after the injection of LA

  • The intensity of pain during the dental treatment

    The intensity of pain during the dental treatment to be assessed by the patient using Numeric Rating Scale. The Numeric Rating Scale, (NRS 0-10; 0 representing no pain at all and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable) is a valid instrument to measure pain.

    immediately after the dental treatment

  • The intensity of stress (discomfort)

    The intensity of stress during the dental treatment to be assessed by the patient using Numeric Rating Scale. The Numeric Rating Scale, (NRS 0-10; 0 representing no discomfortable at all and 10 representing the maximal discomfortable very imaginable) is a valid instrument to measure stress (discomfort)

    immediately after the dental treatment

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Postoperative complications

    24 hours

Study Arms (2)

conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

37 patients received Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block (IANB) for dental treatment of mandibular posterior teeth.

Other: local anaesthetic techniques

Intraligamentary Anesthesia (ILA)

EXPERIMENTAL

35 patients received Intraligamentary Anesthesia (ILA) for dental treatment of mandibular posterior teeth.

Other: local anaesthetic techniques

Interventions

The patients were anesthetized with two different local anaesthetic techniques.

Intraligamentary Anesthesia (ILA)conventional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • patients requiring regular dental in permanent mandibular posterior teeth under local anesthesia

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a clinical or radiographic sign of acute abscess, pus or peri-radicular pathology
  • Patients with a systemic disease requiring special considerations during their dental treatment
  • Patients with contra-indications for any of the components of the anesthetic solution (allergy to articaine, epinephrine, and sulfite)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Medicine of Greifswald

Greifswald, 17487, Germany

Location

Related Publications (20)

  • Pradhan R, Kulkarni D, Shetty L. Evaluation of Efficacy of Intraligamentary Injection Technique for Extraction of Mandibular Teeth-A Prospective Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jan;11(1):ZC110-ZC113. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/22204.9302. Epub 2017 Jan 1.

  • Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x.

  • Siegel K, Schrimshaw EW, Kunzel C, Wolfson NH, Moon-Howard J, Moats HL, Mitchell DA. Types of dental fear as barriers to dental care among African American adults with oral health symptoms in Harlem. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012 Aug;23(3):1294-309. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0088.

  • Bahl R. Local anesthesia in dentistry. Anesth Prog. 2004;51(4):138-42. No abstract available.

  • Shabazfar N, Daublander M, Al-Nawas B, Kammerer PW. Periodontal intraligament injection as alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block--meta-analysis of the literature from 1979 to 2012. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(2):351-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1113-1. Epub 2013 Sep 29.

  • Kaufman E, Weinstein P, Milgrom P. Difficulties in achieving local anesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc. 1984 Feb;108(2):205-8. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1984.0470. No abstract available.

  • Pogrel MA. Permanent nerve damage from inferior alveolar nerve blocks--an update to include articaine. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2007 Apr;35(4):271-3.

  • Marniemi J, Parkki MG. Radiochemical assay of glutathione S-epoxide transferase and its enhancement by phenobarbital in rat liver in vivo. Biochem Pharmacol. 1975 Sep 1;24(17):1569-72. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(75)90080-5. No abstract available.

    PMID: 9RESULT
  • Kämmerer PW, Palarie V, Schiegnitz E, Ziebart T, Al-Nawas B, Daubländer M. Clinical and histological comparison of pulp anesthesia and local diffusion after periodontal ligament injection and intrapapillary infiltration anaesthesia. J Pain Relief. 2012;1(10.4172):2167-0846.

    RESULT
  • Walton RE, Garnick JJ. The periodontal ligament injection: histologic effects on the periodontium in monkeys. J Endod. 1982 Jan;8(1):22-6. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(82)80312-9. No abstract available.

  • Dreyer WP, van Heerden JD, de V Joubert JJ. The route of periodontal ligament injection of local anesthetic solution. J Endod. 1983 Nov;9(11):471-4. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80161-7. No abstract available.

  • Kammerer PW, Adubae A, Buttchereit I, Thiem DGE, Daublander M, Frerich B. Prospective clinical study comparing intraligamentary anesthesia and inferior alveolar nerve block for extraction of posterior mandibular teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1469-1475. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2248-2. Epub 2017 Oct 15.

  • Meechan JG. Intraligamentary anaesthesia. J Dent. 1992 Dec;20(6):325-32. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(92)90018-8.

  • Endo T, Gabka J, Taubenheim L. Intraligamentary anesthesia: benefits and limitations. Quintessence Int. 2008 Jan 1;39(1):e15-25.

  • Kammerer PW, Schiegnitz E, von Haussen T, Shabazfar N, Kammerer P, Willershausen B, Al-Nawas B, Daublander M. Clinical efficacy of a computerised device (STA) and a pressure syringe (VarioJect INTRA) for intraligamentary anaesthesia. Eur J Dent Educ. 2015 Feb;19(1):16-22. doi: 10.1111/eje.12096. Epub 2014 Mar 20.

  • Reed KL, Malamed SF, Fonner AM. Local anesthesia part 2: technical considerations. Anesth Prog. 2012 Fall;59(3):127-36; quiz 137. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-59.3.127.

  • Dumbrigue HB, Lim MV, Rudman RA, Serraon A. A comparative study of anesthetic techniques for mandibular dental extraction. Am J Dent. 1997 Dec;10(6):275-8.

  • Prama R, Padhye L, Pawar H, Rajput N. Efficacy of Intraligamentary Injections as a Primary Anesthetic Technique for mandibular molars & a comparison with inferior alveolar nerve block. Indian Journal of Multidisciplinary Dentistry. 2013 Aug 1;3(4).

    RESULT
  • Malamed SF. Handbook of local anesthesia. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2004 Jun 8.

    RESULT
  • Youssef BR, Sohnel A, Welk A, Abudrya MH, Baider M, Alkilzy M, Splieth C. RCT on the effectiveness of the intraligamentary anesthesia and inferior alveolar nerve block on pain during dental treatment. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Aug;25(8):4825-4832. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03787-x. Epub 2021 Feb 1.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dental CariesPain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DemineralizationTooth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Christian splieth, PHD

    University Medicine of Greifswald

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2020

First Posted

September 24, 2020

Study Start

December 1, 2018

Primary Completion

March 1, 2019

Study Completion

June 15, 2019

Last Updated

September 24, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations