NCT03750578

Brief Summary

Venipuncture is a frequently performed painful and anxiogenic procedure in the paediatric emergency department (PED). Topical anesthetic creams are used to reduce pain, but additional modalities can modulate the nociceptive experience and distress associated with venipuncture. Distraction can improve a patient's experience by mitigating their ability to focus on the painful sensory input. Through its immersive nature, virtual reality (VR) has the potential to distract patients from a 'real world' negative experience such as venipuncture. Given the potential for short- and long-term consequences of poorly controlled pain and distress in children, healthcare professionals must optimize patient comfort during medically required procedures. The aim of this pilot pragmatic RCT study is to determine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effect of a VR device (head-mounted Oculus Rift® (OR)) for pain and distress reduction associated with venipuncture in the PED.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
62

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 9, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 23, 2018

Completed
24 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 17, 2018

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

September 19, 2019

Status Verified

September 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

September 9, 2018

Last Update Submit

September 17, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

virtual realityprocedural painpediatric emergency departmentprocedural anxiety

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Self-reported pain during the procedure: Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS)

    The primary outcome of this study is the mean pain score felt during the procedure (self-report of pain level during the procedure) measured by the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS). The VNRS consists of pain scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain). It is a well-established, valid, and reliable tool for the self-report of pain intensity in children as young as 6 years of age. This scale is widely used as it requires a lower degree of abstraction and less resources when compared to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VNRS requires no physical tools, which explains its wide use in older children and adults with acute pain.

    This outcome will be measured within 2 minutes of the end of the procedure (removal of needle/catheter from vein and of physical restraint in patients where it was used) by asking the child to rate their level of pain during the procedure.

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Evaluation of overall pain management during venipuncture, with respect to pain relief, side effects, physical recovery, and emotional recovery.

    Measured within 5 minutes following the end procedure (removal of needle/catheter from vein and of physical restraint in patients where it was used)

  • Hetero-evaluation (by research nurse) of procedure-related distress

    Measured during the procedure (period between the start of physical restraint or needle/catheter insertion until needle/catheter removal from vein and end of physical restraint in patients where it was used)

  • Baseline pain score: Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS)

    Measured following recruitment and at most 10 minutes before the start of the procedure (before the start of physical restraint or needle/catheter insertion)

  • Auto-evaluation of post procedure-related distress

    Measured within 5 minutes following the end of the procedure (removal of needle/catheter from vein and of physical restraint in patients where it was used)

  • Auto-evaluation of baseline procedure-related distress

    Measured following recruitment and at most 10 minutes before the start of the procedure (before the start of physical restraint or needle/catheter insertion)

Study Arms (2)

Virtual Reality Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in this group will be offered virtual reality distraction through the use of OR in addition to standard of care.

Behavioral: Virtual Reality goggle (Oculus Rift ® Helmet)

Standard of care group

NO INTERVENTION

Patients in this group will receive standard care, including the proposition to use topical anesthetic cream prior to venipuncture attempt, usual distraction and positioning proposed by the treating nurse.

Interventions

as described

Virtual Reality Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age7 Years - 17 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Prescription of a venipuncture (IV line placement or diagnostic venipuncture) by an attending physician

You may not qualify if:

  • Unstable patient or urgent procedure required
  • Cognitive impairment that would render interaction with the VR game and/or answer to the study questionaires unfeasable.
  • Diagnosis of epilepsy or any other condition precluding use of VR technology.
  • A parent is unavailable to provide consent for participation in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

St Justine Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, H3T1C5, Canada

Location

Related Publications (31)

  • Ali S, Chambers A, Johnson DW, Newton AS, Vandermeer B, Williamson J, Curtis SJ. Reported practice variation in pediatric pain management: a survey of Canadian pediatric emergency physicians. CJEM. 2014 Sep;16(5):352-60. doi: 10.2310/8000.2013.131261.

    PMID: 25227643BACKGROUND
  • Ali S, McGrath T, Drendel AL. An Evidence-Based Approach to Minimizing Acute Procedural Pain in the Emergency Department and Beyond. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016 Jan;32(1):36-42; quiz 43-4. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000669.

    PMID: 26720064BACKGROUND
  • American Academy of Pediatrics; Committee on Fetus and Newborn; Canadian Paediatric Society; Fetus and Newborn Committee. Prevention and management of pain in the neonate. An update. Adv Neonatal Care. 2007 Jun;7(3):151-60. doi: 10.1097/01.anc.0000278214.49133.7d.

    PMID: 17844779BACKGROUND
  • American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health; Task Force on Pain in Infants, Children, and Adolescents. The assessment and management of acute pain in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):793-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.3.793.

    PMID: 11533354BACKGROUND
  • Bailey B, Bergeron S, Gravel J, Daoust R. Comparison of four pain scales in children with acute abdominal pain in a pediatric emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;50(4):379-83, 383.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.04.021. Epub 2007 Jun 22.

    PMID: 17588706BACKGROUND
  • Bailey B, Daoust R, Doyon-Trottier E, Dauphin-Pierre S, Gravel J. Validation and properties of the verbal numeric scale in children with acute pain. Pain. 2010 May;149(2):216-221. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.12.008. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

    PMID: 20188471BACKGROUND
  • Bray L, Snodin J, Carter B. Holding and restraining children for clinical procedures within an acute care setting: an ethical consideration of the evidence. Nurs Inq. 2015 Jun;22(2):157-67. doi: 10.1111/nin.12074. Epub 2014 Jul 23.

    PMID: 25053126BACKGROUND
  • Castarlenas E, Jensen MP, von Baeyer CL, Miro J. Psychometric Properties of the Numerical Rating Scale to Assess Self-Reported Pain Intensity in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Clin J Pain. 2017 Apr;33(4):376-383. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000406.

    PMID: 27518484BACKGROUND
  • Chen E, Zeltzer LK, Craske MG, Katz ER. Children's memories for painful cancer treatment procedures: implications for distress. Child Dev. 2000 Jul-Aug;71(4):933-47. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00200.

    PMID: 11016557BACKGROUND
  • Efird J. Blocked randomization with randomly selected block sizes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Jan;8(1):15-20. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8010015. Epub 2010 Dec 23.

    PMID: 21318011BACKGROUND
  • Fein JA, Zempsky WT, Cravero JP; Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine; American Academy of Pediatrics. Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems. Pediatrics. 2012 Nov;130(5):e1391-405. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2536. Epub 2012 Oct 29.

    PMID: 23109683BACKGROUND
  • Foster JP, Taylor C, Spence K. Topical anaesthesia for needle-related pain in newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 4;2(2):CD010331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010331.pub2.

    PMID: 28160271BACKGROUND
  • Gold JI, Mahrer NE. Is Virtual Reality Ready for Prime Time in the Medical Space? A Randomized Control Trial of Pediatric Virtual Reality for Acute Procedural Pain Management. J Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Apr 1;43(3):266-275. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx129.

    PMID: 29053848BACKGROUND
  • Hoffman HG, Chambers GT, Meyer WJ 3rd, Arceneaux LL, Russell WJ, Seibel EJ, Richards TL, Sharar SR, Patterson DR. Virtual reality as an adjunctive non-pharmacologic analgesic for acute burn pain during medical procedures. Ann Behav Med. 2011 Apr;41(2):183-91. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9248-7.

    PMID: 21264690BACKGROUND
  • Humphrey GB, Boon CM, van Linden van den Heuvell GF, van de Wiel HB. The occurrence of high levels of acute behavioral distress in children and adolescents undergoing routine venipunctures. Pediatrics. 1992 Jul;90(1 Pt 1):87-91.

    PMID: 1614786BACKGROUND
  • Kennedy RM, Luhmann J, Zempsky WT. Clinical implications of unmanaged needle-insertion pain and distress in children. Pediatrics. 2008 Nov;122 Suppl 3:S130-3. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1055e.

    PMID: 18978006BACKGROUND
  • Lacey CM, Finkelstein M, Thygeson MV. The impact of positioning on fear during immunizations: supine versus sitting up. J Pediatr Nurs. 2008 Jun;23(3):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2007.09.007.

    PMID: 18492548BACKGROUND
  • LeBaron S, Zeltzer L. Assessment of acute pain and anxiety in children and adolescents by self-reports, observer reports, and a behavior checklist. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1984 Oct;52(5):729-38. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.52.5.729. No abstract available.

    PMID: 6501658BACKGROUND
  • McGrath PJ, Walco GA, Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Brown MT, Davidson K, Eccleston C, Finley GA, Goldschneider K, Haverkos L, Hertz SH, Ljungman G, Palermo T, Rappaport BA, Rhodes T, Schechter N, Scott J, Sethna N, Svensson OK, Stinson J, von Baeyer CL, Walker L, Weisman S, White RE, Zajicek A, Zeltzer L; PedIMMPACT. Core outcome domains and measures for pediatric acute and chronic/recurrent pain clinical trials: PedIMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008 Sep;9(9):771-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.04.007. Epub 2008 Jun 17.

    PMID: 18562251BACKGROUND
  • McMurtry CM, Noel M, Chambers CT, McGrath PJ. Children's fear during procedural pain: preliminary investigation of the Children's Fear Scale. Health Psychol. 2011 Nov;30(6):780-8. doi: 10.1037/a0024817. Epub 2011 Aug 1.

    PMID: 21806301BACKGROUND
  • Price DD, Bush FM, Long S, Harkins SW. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain. 1994 Feb;56(2):217-226. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90097-3.

    PMID: 8008411BACKGROUND
  • Rogers TL, Ostrow CL. The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children. J Pediatr Nurs. 2004 Feb;19(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2003.09.005.

    PMID: 14963868BACKGROUND
  • Sanchez-Rodriguez E, Miro J, Castarlenas E. A comparison of four self-report scales of pain intensity in 6- to 8-year-old children. Pain. 2012 Aug;153(8):1715-1719. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.05.007. Epub 2012 Jun 15.

    PMID: 22703691BACKGROUND
  • Svendsen EJ, Pedersen R, Moen A, Bjork IT. Exploring perspectives on restraint during medical procedures in paediatric care: a qualitative interview study with nurses and physicians. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2017 Dec;12(1):1363623. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2017.1363623.

    PMID: 28889788BACKGROUND
  • Taddio A, Appleton M, Bortolussi R, Chambers C, Dubey V, Halperin S, Hanrahan A, Ipp M, Lockett D, MacDonald N, Midmer D, Mousmanis P, Palda V, Pielak K, Riddell RP, Rieder M, Scott J, Shah V. Reducing the pain of childhood vaccination: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline (summary). CMAJ. 2010 Dec 14;182(18):1989-95. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.092048. Epub 2010 Nov 22. No abstract available.

    PMID: 21098067BACKGROUND
  • Taylor EM, Boyer K, Campbell FA. Pain in hospitalized children: a prospective cross-sectional survey of pain prevalence, intensity, assessment and management in a Canadian pediatric teaching hospital. Pain Res Manag. 2008 Jan-Feb;13(1):25-32. doi: 10.1155/2008/478102.

    PMID: 18301813BACKGROUND
  • Tsze DS, von Baeyer CL, Pahalyants V, Dayan PS. Validity and Reliability of the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale for Children Aged 4 to 17 Years With Acute Pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;71(6):691-702.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.009. Epub 2017 Nov 6.

    PMID: 29107409BACKGROUND
  • Van Hulle Vincent C. Nurses' perceptions of children's pain: a pilot study of cognitive representations. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Mar;33(3):290-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.08.008.

    PMID: 17349498BACKGROUND
  • Weisman SJ, Bernstein B, Schechter NL. Consequences of inadequate analgesia during painful procedures in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998 Feb;152(2):147-9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.152.2.147.

    PMID: 9491040BACKGROUND
  • Wente SJ. Nonpharmacologic pediatric pain management in emergency departments: a systematic review of the literature. J Emerg Nurs. 2013 Mar;39(2):140-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2012.09.011. Epub 2012 Nov 28.

    PMID: 23199786BACKGROUND
  • Osmanlliu E, Trottier ED, Bailey B, Lagace M, Certain M, Khadra C, Sanchez M, Theriault C, Paquin D, Cotes-Turpin C, Le May S. Distraction in the Emergency department using Virtual reality for INtravenous procedures in Children to Improve comfort (DEVINCI): a pilot pragmatic randomized controlled trial. CJEM. 2021 Jan;23(1):94-102. doi: 10.1007/s43678-020-00006-6. Epub 2020 Dec 23.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainPain, Procedural

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Esli Osmanlliu, MD,FRCPC

    Emergency Department, UdM

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Evelyne D. Trottier, MD,FRCPC

    Emergency Department, UdM

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Sylvie Lemay, PhD

    CHU Sainte-Justine Research Centre

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Interventions. When venipuncture (either for IV line insertion or diagnostic venipuncture) is prescribed by a physician, a topical anesthetic cream (Maxilene® 4 - Lidocaine 4%) will be proposed to the patient, as standard of care. Usual positioning will be used by the staff nurse. A) Virtual reality: Patients in this group will be offered virtual reality distraction through the use of OR. B) Control intervention (standard of care): Patients in this group will receive standard care, including the proposition to use topical anesthetic cream prior to venipuncture attempt, usual distraction and positioning proposed by the treating nurse.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Fellow, Pediatric Emergency Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2018

First Posted

November 23, 2018

Study Start

December 17, 2018

Primary Completion

April 30, 2019

Study Completion

June 1, 2019

Last Updated

September 19, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations