Efficacy of Ablative Fractional Laser-assisted Photodynamic Therapy According to the Laser Density for Actinic Keratosis
A Comparison of the Efficacy of Ablative Fractional Laser-assisted Photodynamic Therapy According to the Density of Ablative Laser Channel in the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis
1 other identifier
interventional
47
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Erbium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) ablative fractional laser-assisted photodynamic therapy (AFL-PDT) has shown significant benefit for the treatment of actinic keratosis(AK). Er:YAG ablative fractional laser ablates the epidermis and dermis without significant thermal injury, creating microscopic ablation zones (MAZ) in the portion of the skin that the laser is applied to. The formed MAZ depends on the laser parameters such as laser depth, laser density and laser passes, which affect the treatment outcome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Feb 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 24, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 4, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 6, 2018
CompletedNovember 6, 2018
November 1, 2018
9 months
November 4, 2018
November 4, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Differences of short-term complete response rates between 3 groups
Lesion responses were classified as either a complete response (complete disappearance of the lesion) or a noncomplete response (incomplete disappearance)
Short-term complete response rates were evaluated at 3 months after treatment
Differences of long-term complete response rates between 3 groups
In all cases of complete response, the patients were reviewed at 12 months to check for recurrence. Recurrence was assessed by inspection, dermoscopy, photography, palpation, and histologic findings. For the histopathologic evaluation of treatment response, at the 12-month follow-up visit, a 3-mm punch biopsy of the treated AK lesion was performed in all cases of clinically incomplete response.
Long-term complete response rates were evaluated at 12 months
Difference of the recurrence rates between 3 groups
In all cases of complete response, the patients were reviewed at 12 months to check for recurrence. Recurrence was assessed by inspection, dermoscopy, photography, palpation, and histologic findings. For the histopathologic evaluation of treatment response, at the 12-month follow-up visit, a 3-mm punch biopsy of the treated AK lesion was performed in all cases of clinically incomplete response.
Recurrence rates were evaluated respectively at 12 months after treatment
Differences of the fluorescence intensity between 3 groups
After 3 hours of application with methyl aminolevulinate(MAL), Fluorescence imaging analysis was performed on treatment area with ultraviolet examination light (model 31602,356 nm; Burton Medical Products Crop.) at 10 cm height above the base of each lesion. The red fluorescence was separated and extracted by Matlab program and then used to measure the amount of 633 nm fluorescence of protoporphyrin IX.
After 3 hours of application with MAL, fluorescence intensity imaging was assessed 10 minutes before illumination.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Differences of cosmetic outcomes between 3 groups
The overall cosmetic outcome was assessed 12 months after treatment
Difference of adverse events (erythema, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, edema, itching, oozing, bleeding) rates between 3 groups
Within 12 months after each treatment
Study Arms (3)
5.5% density AFL-PDT
EXPERIMENTALAfter the anaesthetic cream was removed, AFL therapy was performed using a 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL (Joule; Sciton Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) at laser density of 5.5%, 350 µm ablation depth, level 1 coagulation and a single pulse
11% density AFL-PDT
EXPERIMENTALAfter the anaesthetic cream was removed, AFL therapy was performed using a 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL (Joule; Sciton Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) at laser density of 11%, 350 µm ablation depth, level 1 coagulation and a single pulse
22% density AFL-PDT
EXPERIMENTALAfter the anaesthetic cream was removed, AFL therapy was performed using a 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL (Joule; Sciton Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) at laser density of 22%, 350 µm ablation depth, level 1 coagulation and a single pulse
Interventions
For AFL pre-treatment, lidocaine/prilocaine (5%) cream (EMLA; Astra Pharmaceuticals, LP, Westborough, MA, USA) was applied to the treatment area under occlusion for 30 min
After the anaesthetic cream was removed, AFL therapy was performed using a 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL (Joule; Sciton Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) at 5.5% or 11% or 22% laser density with 350 µm ablation depth, level 1 coagulation and a single pulse
Immediately after AFL treatment, an approximately 1- mm-thick layer of MAL (Metvix, PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) was applied to the lesion and on 5 mm of surrounding normal tissue. Incubation time is 3 hours
After 3 hours of application with MAL, saline wash was performed and fluorescence imaging analysis was performed with ultraviolet examination light (model 31602,356 nm; Burton Medical Products Crop.) at 10 cm height above the base of each lesion. The red fluorescence (610 nm-700 nm) was separated and extracted by Matlab program and then used to measure the amount of 633 nm fluorescence of protoporphyrin IX.
After incubation for 3 hours, the dressing and cream were removed, and the area was cleansed with saline. The area was irradiated with a red light-emitting diode lamp (Aktilite CL 128; PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) with peak emission at 632 nm, placed 5 cm away from the skin surface, and a total light dose of 37 J/cm-2. All patients wore protective goggles during illumination.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Korean patients aged ≥ 18 years who had biopsy-confirmed Actinic keratosis lesions
You may not qualify if:
- photosensitivity disorder patients
- Lactating or pregnant women
- Patients with porphyria or a known allergy to any of the constituents of the MAL cream and lidocaine
- Patients with systemic disease, history of malignant melanoma, tendency of melasma development or keloid formation, any AK treatment of the area in the previous 4 weeks, or any conditions associated with a risk of poor protocol compliance; and patients on immunosuppressive treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dong-A University
Busan, Seo-gu, 49201, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ki-hoon Song, MD
Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Dong-A University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 4, 2018
First Posted
November 6, 2018
Study Start
February 1, 2017
Primary Completion
October 30, 2017
Study Completion
October 24, 2018
Last Updated
November 6, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share