Efficacy of Ingenol Mebutate on Actinic Keratoses and Field Cancerization vs Cryotherapy
A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Ingenol Mebutate on Actinic Keratoses and Field Cancerization Compared to Cryotherapy
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of ingenol mebutate gel (150 mcg / g per day, to be applied on a predetermined area of 25 cm2 of skin of the face or scalp, for 3 days consecutive) cryotherapy (application with 5 seconds of freezing time of each lesion located in a predetermined skin area of 25 cm2 of the face or scalp) in the treatment of actinic keratosis and their field cancerization. Study details: This study is randomized. 50 subjects with at least two actinic keratoses of grade I and II, located in two different districts of 25 cm2 skin of the face or scalp, and who meet all the inclusion criteria will be enrolled in the study by the investigators in the three different centers mentioned above. The investigators will assess the effect of treatment by confocal microscopy and digital dermoscopy. The investigator will acquire images of selected areas of the face and scalp before and after treatment. Data will be collected and analyzed by the coordinating centre. Procedure for the study: Recruitment of subjects; random assignment of treatment (ingenol mebutate gel 150 micrograms/g and cryotherapy) to the two skin areas of 25 cm2 of the subject recruited; evaluation of the two areas with reflectance confocal microscopy and digital dermoscope. The measurements will be carried out at time 0, after 1 month and 6 months. The investigator must fill out a form for each subject at the beginning (day 0), after 1 month and at the end of the study (after 6 months). The subject must complete a questionnaire at the beginning (day 0), after 1 month and at the last follow-up visit (after 6 months). Measurement parameters: Dermoscopy and confocal microscopy will be used to assess the percentage reduction in actinic keratoses and the damage of the cancerous area in the two selected areas treated with ingenol mebutate gel or cryotherapy, respectively. Adverse / side events will be collected at each visit by the investigator and will be contained in another form.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Apr 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 2, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 13, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 12, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2018
CompletedSeptember 24, 2019
September 1, 2019
1 year
December 2, 2016
September 23, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
At least 75% reduction in the total AK count relative to baseline
The primary efficacy endpoint is the percentage change, at the end of the treatment period, in the number of AK lesions that were originally defined in the selected AK target area at baseline. The percentage change in the number of AK lesions is calculated as the number of lesions present at the end of the treatment period in the target area minus the number of AK lesions present in the target area at baseline visit divided by the number of lesions present in the target area at baseline. This variable will be analysed using a non-parametric analysis (Wilcoxon Rank-sum test).
6-month follow-up
Reduction of subclinical AK lesions according to a Reflectance Confocal Microscopy score
Change from baseline in RCM score of target area and RCM score of cancerization field at the end of the treatment period. Each of the 13 RCM criteria will be scored 0 (absent), 1 (\<25%), 2 (25%-50%), 3 (50-75%), or 4(\>75%). An overall score will be obtained by averaging the RCM scores at the epidermal, DEJ and dermal level. The same approach will be used for the RCM examination of the cancerization field. The above variables will be compared between the groups using a t-test, 95% confidence interval for the between-group difference will be provided.
6-month follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Absence of new lesions after a follow-up period of 6 months
6-month follow-up
cosmetic outcome
6-month follow-up
Study Arms (2)
Ingenol mebutate
ACTIVE COMPARATORapplication of ingenol mebutate for 3 consecutive days on an area of face/scalp of 25 cm2
cryotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORapplication of criotherapy on actinic keratosis present in an area of face/scalp of 25 cm2 different from the ingenol mebutate area
Interventions
150 mcg / g per day, to be applied on a predetermined area of 25 cm2 of skin of the face or scalp, for 3 days consecutive
application with 5 seconds of freezing time of each lesion located in a predetermined skin area of 25 cm2 of the face or scalp
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Current diagnosis of AK, with ≥2 lesions of grade I and/or II located in two different anatomical districts (within a contiguous 25 cm2 area on the face, scalp or forehead);
- Male ≥ 18 years of age or Female \> 60 years of age;
- Skin type I or II according to Fitzpatrick;
- Patient has confirmed his/her willingness to participate in this study after being informed of all aspects of the study that are relevant to his/her decision to participate, by signing and dating the approved informed consent form, according to ICH and local laws.
- The 25 cm2 contiguous treatment areas could be of any shape, e.g. 5 cm x 5 cm, 2 cm x 12.5 cm, 3 cm x 8.3 cm.
You may not qualify if:
- Has received any therapy for AK within the past 3 months
- Has AK of grade III
- Has currently a skin cancer or shows an early stage of skin cancer;
- Has another skin disease that requires treatment with other medications in the AK area or in distance of 3 cm;
- Use of cosmetic or therapeutic products and procedures which could interfere with assessments of the treatment area;
- Immunosuppressive therapies or current treatment for cancer;
- Clinically unstable medical condition;
- High risk group for HIV infection or presentation of other infectious diseases (hepatitis A virus , hepatitis B virus , hepatitis C virus , Tuberculosis, etc);
- Allergies to the tested gel (ingenol mebutate and eccipients);
- Psychiatric disease that may interfere with follow-up of study procedures;
- Participation in other clinical trials up to 30 days prior to day 1 of the study;
- Patient is, for any reason, considered by the investigator to be an unsuitable candidate for the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Second University of Naples
Naples, 80131, Italy
Related Publications (8)
Frost CA, Green AC. Epidemiology of solar keratoses. Br J Dermatol. 1994 Oct;131(4):455-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1994.tb08544.x.
PMID: 7947197RESULTFu W, Cockerell CJ. The actinic (solar) keratosis: a 21st-century perspective. Arch Dermatol. 2003 Jan;139(1):66-70. doi: 10.1001/archderm.139.1.66. No abstract available.
PMID: 12533168RESULTOrtonne JP. From actinic keratosis to squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2002 Apr;146 Suppl 61:20-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.146.s61.6.x.
PMID: 11966728RESULTCohen JL. Actinic keratosis treatment as a key component of preventive strategies for nonmelanoma skin cancer. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010 Jun;3(6):39-44.
PMID: 20725550RESULTPadilla RS, Sebastian S, Jiang Z, Nindl I, Larson R. Gene expression patterns of normal human skin, actinic keratosis, and squamous cell carcinoma: a spectrum of disease progression. Arch Dermatol. 2010 Mar;146(3):288-93. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.378.
PMID: 20231500RESULTVatve M, Ortonne JP, Birch-Machin MA, Gupta G. Management of field change in actinic keratosis. Br J Dermatol. 2007 Dec;157 Suppl 2:21-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08268.x.
PMID: 18067627RESULTFidler B, Goldberg T. Ingenol mebutate gel (picato): a novel agent for the treatment of actinic keratoses. P T. 2014 Jan;39(1):40-6.
PMID: 24672213RESULTAndrews MD. Cryosurgery for common skin conditions. Am Fam Physician. 2004 May 15;69(10):2365-72.
PMID: 15168956RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Giuseppe Argenziano, Prof
University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 2, 2016
First Posted
December 13, 2016
Study Start
April 12, 2017
Primary Completion
April 30, 2018
Study Completion
July 30, 2018
Last Updated
September 24, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share