Efficacy and Safety of Treatment of Actinic Keratoses With Photodynamic Therapy Between MAL Cream and ALA Gel
Comparative Intraindividual Study, About the Efficacy and Safety of Treatment of Actinic Keratoses With Photodynamic Therapy Between Acid Methyl Aminolevulinate Cream and Aminolevulinic Gel
2 other identifiers
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Photodynamic therapy technique (PDT) is a conventional technique which is performed applying the product under occlusion lesions, let it incubate for 3 hours and then exposed skin to a light source, usually red. The conclusions of efficacy, tolerance and satisfaction that today are known about PDT with MAL, but not with ALA, which is a new photosensitizer indicated for Actinic Keratoses. The pharmaceutical form of ALA is a gel, which gives a hypothetical better penetration and consequently it is more effectively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Dec 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 30, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 6, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2016
CompletedJanuary 6, 2016
January 1, 2016
3 months
December 30, 2015
January 5, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of MAL with the new BF -200 ALA photosensitizer in actinic keratosis. The Immediate and Delayed Local Reaction and Tolerance will be measured to compare MAL and ALA.
The main objective of this study is to compare the MAL with the new BF -200 ALA photosensitizer in terms of local reaction and tolerance for the treatment of actinic keratosis . First of all, the immediate local reaction to the lighting may include a greater or less erythema, inflammation and edema. It is scored on a scale of 0-10 where 0 is normal skin without local reaction and 10 is a maximum local reaction. The delayed local reaction is defined by the presence in different degrees of erythema, swelling, edema, pustules and scabs. They are also marked from 0 to 10 where 0 is normal skin without reaction and 10 for local maximum reaction. On the other hand, tolerance will be measured by the number, frequency and grade of reported adverse events in patients.
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of the clinical response measured by the efficacy and characteristics of fluorescence emission between the two photosensitizers. Partial and total response will be defined with ≥75% (partial response) and 100% (complete response.)
1 month
Study Arms (2)
METHYLAMINOLEVULINATE HYDROCHLORIDE
ACTIVE COMPARATORMETHYLAMINOLEVULINATE HYDROCHLORIDE (MAL)cream 160mg/g. Intervention: Just one application of the product in the actinic keratosis lesions before the photodynamic therapy
AMINOLEVULINIC ACID HYDROCHLORIDE
EXPERIMENTALAMINOLEVULINIC ACID HYDROCHLORIDE (ALA) gel 78mg/g. Intervention: Just one application of the product in the actinic keratosis lesions before the photodynamic therapy
Interventions
This is an intrapatient randomized clinical trial. All patients participating in the trial will receive both, experimental and control treatment, randomization will be used to determine side (right or left for treatment). Three visits will be scheduled. In the first visit epidemiological data will be collected , Actinic Keratoses are counted and drawn in a transparent template and also a photograph of each side. In that first visit treatment the PDT will be also performed, the degree of fluorescence, the pain and the degree of immediate local reaction will be measured. skin after PDT. In the second visit, to be held at 2 or 3 days, the delayed local reaction degree will be assessed. And in the third visit, held a month of PDT the clinical response and patient satisfaction will be assessed.
This is an intrapatient randomized clinical trial. All patients participating in the trial will receive both, experimental and control treatment, randomization will be used to determine side (right or left for treatment). Three visits will be scheduled. In the first visit epidemiological data will be collected , Actinic Keratoses are counted and drawn in a transparent template and also a photograph of each side. In that first visit treatment the PDT will be also performed, the degree of fluorescence, the pain and the degree of immediate local reaction will be measured. skin after PDT. In the second visit, to be held at 2 or 3 days, the delayed local reaction degree will be assessed. And in the third visit, held a month of PDT the clinical response and patient satisfaction will be assessed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient over 18 years old and capable of giving informed consent.
- \. Provide at least 5 QA in two symmetrical areas of the face or scalp.
- \. Accept the abandonment of sun creams and other creams (retinoic hydroxy acids, emollients, Topical Antibiotics ) in the treatment area during the time of the study.
- \. Accept that it will postpone the treatment of other actinic keratosis close to treatment area.
- \. Accept to go to scheduled visits. They should answer a questionnaire about epidemiology, history and treatment satisfaction. They will accept a photo of treatment area at each visit.
You may not qualify if:
- Have any dermatological disease on the treatment zone or around it.
- Patients who have previously been treated with therapy Photodynamic in targeted areas.
- Patients with alcohol or drug dependence.
- Patients who are currently participating in other studies.
- Patients who have received any of the following medications at a time less than the indicated:
- Systemic chemotherapy in the last 6 months.
- Retinoids systemic , interferon , immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive , cytotoxic including agents , corticosteroids systemic , in the last month .
- Ultraviolet A light, Ultraviolet B light, ablative laser, dermabrasion, chemical peels, in the last 6 months.
- Topical retinoids , topical 5 -fluorouracil in the last month.
- Cryotherapy , surgical excision, curettage, topical corticosteroids in the last month.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fundación instituto valenciano de Oncología
Valencia, Valencia, 46009, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carlos Serra
Servicio Dermatologia FIVO
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 30, 2015
First Posted
January 6, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2016
Last Updated
January 6, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-01