Effect of Enteral Immunonutrition on Immune, Inflammatory Markers and Nutritional Status in Patients Undergoing Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
124
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Enteral immunonutrition (EIN) has been gaining increasing attention, but data of its immune and anti-inflammatory function in patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer are poorly investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of EIN on immune function, inflammation response and nutrition status when compared to standard enteral nutrition (SEN). The investigators believe that the proportion of cluster of differentiation 4 T-cells(CD4+T-cells), cluster of differentiation 3 T-cells(CD3+T-cells) and the counts of CD4+ / cluster of differentiation 8 T-cells (CD8+), immunoglobulin G(IgG), immunoglobulin M(IgM), and immunoglobulin A (IgA) were larger in EIN group, while the level of WBC, CRP and TNF-α were lower and nutritional status was similar.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable gastric-cancer
Started Jan 2017
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 25, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 5, 2018
CompletedNovember 5, 2018
November 1, 2018
1.5 years
October 25, 2018
November 2, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change from baseline serum level of immune cytokines to postoperative day 5
levels of IgA, IgG and IgM in g/L,
baseline and postoperative day 5
Change from baseline serum level of immune markers to postoperative day 5
count of CD4+/CD8+
baseline, postoperative day 5(POD 5)
Change from baseline serum concentration of immune markers to postoperative day 5
percentage of CD3+ T cell of serum
baseline, postoperative day 5(POD 5)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
changes among baseline, postoperative day 1, 3 and 5 serum concentration of inflammatory markers
baseline, postoperative day 1, 3, and 5
Change among baseline, postoperative day 3 and 5 serum nutritional markers
baseline,postoperative day 3 and 5
Study Arms (2)
EIN group
EXPERIMENTALEnteral formula including not only basic energy components, but also immune components such as omega-3 fatty acids, glutamine (Gln), arginine (Arg), and nucleotide.
SEN group
ACTIVE COMPARATOREnteral formula including only basic energy components.
Interventions
Enteral nutrition was started within 12h at an infusion rate of 20ml per hour for SEN group and 16ml per hour for EIN group in the first 24h. The rates of flow were gradually increasing with 50ml/h in SEN versus 40ml/h in EIN on day 2, 70ml/h versus 56ml/h on day 3 and 100ml/h versus 80ml/h until the 7th day depending on the feeding tolerance.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 18 to 80 years
- with histologically diagnosed cancer of stomach
- candidates for elective subtotal or total gastrectomy
You may not qualify if:
- pregnant or lactating woman,
- diagnoses of mental diseases
- resent severe concomitant diseases (chronic cardiopulmonary disease, chronic renal failure, etc.)
- known allergies to nutrition formula or component
- drug intolerance
- known immunodeficiency or autoimmune diseases
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Eligible patients were randomly assigned in equal numbers to undergo SEN or EIN according to a computer-generated randomization list managed by a dietary nurse not involved in the study. The study was double-blind: SEN and EIN feeds were identical in color and type of container, so treatment assignments were not revealed to patients or to any staff members.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- associate chief physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 25, 2018
First Posted
November 5, 2018
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
July 1, 2018
Study Completion
September 20, 2018
Last Updated
November 5, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11