NCT03730545

Brief Summary

Enteral immunonutrition (EIN) has been gaining increasing attention, but data of its immune and anti-inflammatory function in patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer are poorly investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of EIN on immune function, inflammation response and nutrition status when compared to standard enteral nutrition (SEN). The investigators believe that the proportion of cluster of differentiation 4 T-cells(CD4+T-cells), cluster of differentiation 3 T-cells(CD3+T-cells) and the counts of CD4+ / cluster of differentiation 8 T-cells (CD8+), immunoglobulin G(IgG), immunoglobulin M(IgM), and immunoglobulin A (IgA) were larger in EIN group, while the level of WBC, CRP and TNF-α were lower and nutritional status was similar.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
124

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable gastric-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2017

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2017

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 20, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 25, 2018

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 5, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

November 5, 2018

Status Verified

November 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

October 25, 2018

Last Update Submit

November 2, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

gastric cancerenteral nutritionenteral immunonutritionimmune functioninflammation response

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Change from baseline serum level of immune cytokines to postoperative day 5

    levels of IgA, IgG and IgM in g/L,

    baseline and postoperative day 5

  • Change from baseline serum level of immune markers to postoperative day 5

    count of CD4+/CD8+

    baseline, postoperative day 5(POD 5)

  • Change from baseline serum concentration of immune markers to postoperative day 5

    percentage of CD3+ T cell of serum

    baseline, postoperative day 5(POD 5)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • changes among baseline, postoperative day 1, 3 and 5 serum concentration of inflammatory markers

    baseline, postoperative day 1, 3, and 5

  • Change among baseline, postoperative day 3 and 5 serum nutritional markers

    baseline,postoperative day 3 and 5

Study Arms (2)

EIN group

EXPERIMENTAL

Enteral formula including not only basic energy components, but also immune components such as omega-3 fatty acids, glutamine (Gln), arginine (Arg), and nucleotide.

Dietary Supplement: enteral immunonutrition

SEN group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Enteral formula including only basic energy components.

Dietary Supplement: enteral immunonutrition

Interventions

enteral immunonutritionDIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Enteral nutrition was started within 12h at an infusion rate of 20ml per hour for SEN group and 16ml per hour for EIN group in the first 24h. The rates of flow were gradually increasing with 50ml/h in SEN versus 40ml/h in EIN on day 2, 70ml/h versus 56ml/h on day 3 and 100ml/h versus 80ml/h until the 7th day depending on the feeding tolerance.

EIN groupSEN group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged 18 to 80 years
  • with histologically diagnosed cancer of stomach
  • candidates for elective subtotal or total gastrectomy

You may not qualify if:

  • pregnant or lactating woman,
  • diagnoses of mental diseases
  • resent severe concomitant diseases (chronic cardiopulmonary disease, chronic renal failure, etc.)
  • known allergies to nutrition formula or component
  • drug intolerance
  • known immunodeficiency or autoimmune diseases

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stomach Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesStomach Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
Eligible patients were randomly assigned in equal numbers to undergo SEN or EIN according to a computer-generated randomization list managed by a dietary nurse not involved in the study. The study was double-blind: SEN and EIN feeds were identical in color and type of container, so treatment assignments were not revealed to patients or to any staff members.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients were randomized to receive enteral immunonutrition or standard enteral nutrition in postoperative day 1 by enteral feeding.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
associate chief physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2018

First Posted

November 5, 2018

Study Start

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion

July 1, 2018

Study Completion

September 20, 2018

Last Updated

November 5, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-11