Oral Sedation With and Without Nitrous Oxide
Oral Sedation With/Without Nitrous Oxide in Pediatric Dental Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aims: The objective of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness of oral midazolam-hydroxyzine with/without nitrous oxide. Design: This was a randomized split mouth, cross over and triple-blinded clinical study. Thirty uncooperative healthy children aged six to nine, whose needed dental treatments.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Nov 2018
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 26, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 2, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 17, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 6, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 6, 2019
CompletedJanuary 8, 2019
January 1, 2019
2 months
October 26, 2018
January 5, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Behavior improvement on the modified Houpt behavioral rating scale
Behavior assessment improvement related to the addition of N2O/O2 to the combination midazolam-hydroxyzine.
Behavior will assess at the end of the session (about 30-90 min) by evaluating the sessions 's videotapes using overall assessment (range from 1 to 4, higher values represent a better outcome) of the modified Houpt behavioral rating scale
Behavior improvement on the modified Houpt behavioral rating scale
Behavior assessment improvement related to the addition of N2O/O2 to the combination midazolam-hydroxyzine.
Behavior assess after 30 min of oral medications administered by evaluate the sessions's videotapes using of Sleep,movement,Head/oral resistance,Cry,Verbal assessments(range1- 4,higher values is the better outcome)of modified Houpt behavioral scale
Study Arms (2)
A: Midazolam-hydroxyzine with 100% O2
ACTIVE COMPARATORMidazolam-hydroxyzine with 100% O2 was administrated to 30 children. Drug: Oral Medication (midazolam 7.5 mg and hydroxyzine 10 mg) and Inhalation Gas 100% O2 Patients were randomly assigned to received one of two regimens (A,B) in across over design, Behavior was assessed using the modified Houpt behavioral rating scale, by evaluating the videotapes of all patients at both the pretreatment and treatment phases.
Midazolam-hydroxyzine with 50% N2O/ O2
EXPERIMENTALchildren received Midazolam-hydroxyzine with 50% N2O/O2, one tablet of oral midazolam 7.5 mg and one tablet of hydroxyzine 10 mg with 50% N2O/O2. Drug: Oral Medication and Inhalation Gas Patients were randomly assigned to received one of two regimens (A,B) in across over design, Behavior was assessed using the modified Houpt behavioral rating scale, by evaluating the videotapes of all patients at both the pretreatment and treatment phases.
Interventions
Patients received Oral Sedatives with 100% O2 ,Behavior was assessed using the modified Houpt behavioral rating scale, by evaluating the videotapes of all patients at both the pretreatment and treatment phases.
Patients received Oral Sedatives with 50% nitrous ,Behavior was assessed using the modified Houpt behavioral rating scale, by evaluating the videotapes of all patients at both the pretreatment and treatment phases.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA Classification I.
- minimum weight of 18 kg
- uncooperative children scored 1 or 2 on Frankle Scale.
- requiring nonemergency, bilateral mandibular dental treatments under local anesthesia.
You may not qualify if:
- known allergy to midazolam and/or hydroxyzine.
- upper respiratory tract infection with nasal discharge.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tishreen University
Latakia, Syria
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Nabih Raslan, Dr
Tishreen University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor) Each of the children/parents, the dentist and the outcomes assessors were blinded. To ensure the blindness of the dentist, the inhalation sedation machine was placed in a way that he could not see the flow rate panel or the type of the administered gases.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 26, 2018
First Posted
November 2, 2018
Study Start
November 17, 2018
Primary Completion
January 6, 2019
Study Completion
January 6, 2019
Last Updated
January 8, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01