Effect of a Humanoid Robot on Dental Anxiety in Children
The Impact of a Humanoid Robot on Children's Dental Anxiety, Behavior and Salivary Amylase Levels
1 other identifier
interventional
102
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Dental anxiety causes unwanted distresses in children. The present study is aimed to analyze using both technological and psychological distraction in children aged 4-10 with a humanoid robot. Materials and Methods: One hundred and two children (fifty two girls, fifty boys; mean age: 6.71±1.43 years) were included. Fifty children were participated in robot group and fifty two children were participated in control. Salivary alpha amylase were analyzed before, after, and 10 min after treatment. Frankl Behaviour Rating Scale (FBRS), Facial Image Scale (FIS), salivary amylase levels, and physiological pulse rate were used to assess the stress related changes. Statistical tests were used with p value fixed at 0.05.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 3, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 4, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 14, 2022
CompletedNovember 29, 2023
February 1, 2022
3 months
February 4, 2022
November 25, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Child's anxiety assessment
• The Children's Fear Survey Schedule-Dental Subscale (CFSS-DS) was used in the assessment of dental anxiety in children. It consists of 15 questions. Children are asked to give scores from 1 (not afraid) to 5 (very afraid) for each question. The total score is between 15 and 75 points. Children with CFSS-DS ≥38 were defined as dentally anxious.
30 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Child's behaviour assessment
30 minutes
Pulse rate
30 minutes
Salivary amylase activity
30 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Standard treatment group
SHAM COMPARATORDental treatment was carried out with tell-show-do technique as a behavioural guidance technique.
Robot group
EXPERIMENTALThe robot group (RG) were treated with the robot accompaniment
Interventions
The effect of tell-show-do technique during dental treatment on behavior in pediatric patients was evaluated and compared.
The effect of the tell-show-do and distraction technique during dental treatment on behavior in pediatric patients was evaluated and compared.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- healthy children
- no previous dental experience
- need pulpotomy in at least one mandibular primary molar
You may not qualify if:
- Children showing definitely negative behaviour (Frankl 1) during dental prophylaxis at the first visit.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Istanbul Universitylead
- Istanbul Technical Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assoc. Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 4, 2022
First Posted
February 14, 2022
Study Start
February 1, 2017
Primary Completion
May 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 3, 2018
Last Updated
November 29, 2023
Record last verified: 2022-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share