The Effectiveness of an Electronic Pain Management Programme (ePain) for Working Population With Chronic Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
148
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pain in commonly found in working population. The working population who aged from 15 to 64 is the largest portion of population in Hong Kong. Also, the prevalence of chronic pain in this population group is high. The issue requires special attention. Researches demonstrated pain affects a person in a multidimensional way. Pain induces negative effects to both the physical and psychological aspects. The levels of depression, anxiety, stress are increased and quality of life is decreased in people with chronic pain. They are interrelated to pain. As pain induced discomforts, people adopted self-initiated treatments as treatment. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain management interventions are commonly used. Although people used different ways to relieve the pain, they tend to bear the pain to work or take sick leave. This contributes to the work loss to the whole society. Pain service in Hong Kong is scarce in the public and private sectors. It takes months for a pain sufferer to be arranged for a pain clinic follow-up. It is possible for the pain get worsen while waiting for the pain service. The pain can be difficult to treat afterwards. As self-initiated treatments are welcomed by the pain sufferers, pain education can be focused on empowering the pain sufferers on their pain knowledge and self-management techniques. The pain self-efficacy can be enhanced. The pain sufferers can be benefited from lowering the pain intensity and negative emotions. It can be a solution to develop an online pain management programme to ease the service demand. Limited studies are found for online pain management programmes to improve the pain self-efficacy and self-management techniques. In order to fill the knowledge gap and service gap, the present study aims to evaluate an online pain management programme (ePain) in improving the self-efficacy, reduction of pain intensity, decreased levels of depression, anxiety and stress, and improving quality of life in pain management in adults with chronic pain. Participants are randomised to the intervention group or the control group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable chronic-pain
Started Nov 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable chronic-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 23, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 24, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2022
CompletedApril 9, 2020
April 1, 2020
3.4 years
October 23, 2018
April 8, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain self-efficacy
Changes from baseline to Week 3, Week 6 and Week 12 in pain self-efficacy using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire
Baseline, Week 3, Week 6 and Week 12
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Pain situations
Baseline, Week 3, Week 6 and Week 12
Negative emotions
Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12
Changes in level of quality of life
Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12
Feedback
Week 6
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALePain will be accessible by the intervention group.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONNo intervention will be applied to control group and they can download an educational pamphlet only.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 15 to 65;
- Performed a formal job during the seven days before the intervention or worked for pay or profit during the seven days before the intervention;
- Able to read and understand traditional Chinese;
- With non-cancer chronic pain for at least three months;
- With pain scored one or above in the numeric rating scale from zero to ten in the Chinese version of Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-C)
You may not qualify if:
- Adults aged 15 below or above 65;
- Not performed any formal jobs for pay or profit during the seven days before the intervention;
- With cancer pain or non-cancer acute pain for less than 3 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
School of Nursing
Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Related Publications (1)
Tang SK, Tse MMY, Leung SF, Fotis T. The effectiveness of an electronic pain management programme for the working population with chronic pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020 May 24;21(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04348-5.
PMID: 32448387DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mimi Tse, PhD
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Self-efficacy theory of behavioral change is adopted to guide the conceptual framework and development of the intervention. It was first introduced by Bandura in 1977. In the theory, self-efficacy would increase when a person participates actively in the activities to gain experience. There are two expectations in the model. The efficacy expectations of the person would contribute to the person's behaviour. The person performs the behaviour and would expect the outcomes and this is outcome expectations. The theory has been discussed for how to apply in health promotion. As the theory integrates self-efficacy and self-regulatory elements, people are benefited from the improved health outcomes which is resulted from the health behaviours.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 23, 2018
First Posted
October 24, 2018
Study Start
November 1, 2018
Primary Completion
April 1, 2022
Study Completion
April 1, 2022
Last Updated
April 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share