NCT03561844

Brief Summary

In recent decades, following an increased longevity in Hong Kong, there is a drastic increase in the prevalence chronic conditions, including chronic pain, seems to be the main reasons of suffering for many older adults. This condition not only pose a burden to the whole family but also the healthcare system. While conventional treatment of chronic pain using pharmacotherapy and non-pharmacological treatments has been effective for managing symptoms, owing to the adverse side effects caused by anti-psychotic drugs and the short effective period incurred by non-pharmacological interventions, development of alternative and non-pharmacological approaches for the management of pain is of urgent need. Research has shown that aromatherapy (both administered through inhalation and therapeutic massage) has been effective in reducing showing pain-relieving effects. These findings support the premise that aromatherapy and the investigators hope to provide further evidence to support the use of aromatherapy as an evidence-based mainstream intervention for pain relief in older adults with chronic pain. Whilst there is sufficient evidence to support the effectiveness of aromatherapy, few studies compared the effectiveness of the use of aromatherapy by inhalation and/or therapeutic massage. The investigators aim to address the above research gaps on the clinical application of aromatherapy on chronic pain, with a focus on comparing the differential effectiveness between administration by inhalation and administration by therapeutic massage. The proposed research aims to (1) test the efficacy and effectiveness of aromatherapy on the symptom management of chronic pain in older adults; (2) compare the effects of aromatherapy-scent (i.e., inhalation) and aromatherapy-touch (i.e., therapeutic massage) in older adults with chronic pain. This study also explores the benefits of aromatherapy on cognitive functioning, functional performance and social engagement as secondary outcomes. A randomized, controlled, and single blinded trial is proposed. 120 older adults with chronic pain will be randomly assigned to aroma inhalation (intervention), aroma-touch or wait-list (control) treatments. Pain intensity and subjective changes in mood states (primary outcome), cognitive functioning, functional performance and social engagement (secondary outcome) will be assessed three times: pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment. If the study hypotheses are supported, the findings will provide empirical support for a treatment option that could improve manage the symptoms of patients diagnosed with chronic conditions, and also improve cognitive functioning, functional performance, and social engagement of older adults.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable chronic-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable chronic-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 29, 2017

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 8, 2018

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 19, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 20, 2018

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

January 25, 2019

Status Verified

January 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

June 8, 2018

Last Update Submit

January 23, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

    Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) will be used to measure the changes of pain among three time points within four months. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable").

    the change from baseline to the completion of intervention (16 weeks later)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Cantonese Version of the Mini-mental State Examination (CMMSE)

    baseline, 8 weeks after baseline, and 16 weeks after baseline

  • Chinese Version of the Barthel Index-100

    baseline, 8 weeks after baseline, and 16 weeks after baseline

  • Index of Social Engagement(ISE)

    baseline, 8 weeks after baseline, and 16 weeks after baseline

  • Profile of Mood States (POMS)- Shorterned Chinese Version

    baseline, 8 weeks after baseline, and 16 weeks after baseline

Study Arms (3)

aromatherapy-scent

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Other: aromatherapy

aromatherapy-touch

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Other: aromatherapy

waiting-list control

NO INTERVENTION

Interventions

Each of participants in the aromatherapy (inhalation) group will receive inhalation aromatherapy and those in the aromatherapy (massage) group will receive aromatherapeutic massage. As to the waiting control group, participants will be given either one of these two interventions after the implementation phase is completed.

aromatherapy-scentaromatherapy-touch

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years of age or older
  • having a CMMSE score over or equal to 15
  • having chronic pain or a widespread pain condition such as fibromyalgia for at least 3 months
  • be willing to participate in the research, with informed consent signed by their guardian or carer.

You may not qualify if:

  • being allergic to essential oils
  • refusal to give consent
  • being over-sensitive to tactile stimulation
  • having a history of kidney and liver disease
  • no history of an epileptic seizure.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Interventions

Aromatherapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mind-Body TherapiesComplementary TherapiesTherapeuticsPhytotherapySensory Art TherapiesPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
professor and head of rehabilitation science department

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2018

First Posted

June 19, 2018

Study Start

November 29, 2017

Primary Completion

September 20, 2018

Study Completion

October 1, 2018

Last Updated

January 25, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations