NCT03707366

Brief Summary

This study will implement and evaluate a mentoring program designed to promote positive youth development and reduce adverse outcomes among maltreated adolescents with open child welfare cases. Teenagers who have been maltreated are at heightened risk for involvement in delinquency, substance use, and educational failure as a result of disrupted attachments with caregivers and exposure to violence within their homes and communities. Although youth mentoring is a widely used prevention approach nationally, it has not been rigorously studied for its effects in preventing these adverse outcomes among maltreated youth involved in the child welfare system. This randomized controlled trial will permit us to implement and evaluate the Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens (FHF-T) program, which will use mentoring and skills training within an innovative positive youth development (PYD) framework to promote adaptive functioning and prevent adverse outcomes. Graduate student mentors will deliver 9 months of prevention programming in teenagers' homes and communities. Mentors will focus on helping youth set and reach goals that will improve their functioning in five targeted "REACH" domains: Relationships, Education, Activities, Career, and Health. In reaching those goals, mentors will help youth build social-emotional skills associated with preventing adverse outcomes (e.g., emotion regulation, communication, problem solving). The randomized controlled trial will enroll 234 racially and ethnically diverse 8th and 9th grade youth (117 intervention, 117 control), who will provide data at baseline prior to randomization, immediately post-program and 15 months post program follow-up. The aims of the study include testing the efficacy of FHF-T for high-risk 8th and 9th graders in preventing adverse outcomes and examining whether better functioning in positive youth development domains mediates intervention effects. It is hypothesized that youth randomly assigned to the FHF-T prevention condition, relative to youth assigned to the control condition, will evidence better functioning on indices of positive youth development in the REACH domains leading to better long-term outcomes, including adaptive functioning, high school graduation, career attainment/employment, healthy relationships, and quality of life.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
234

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
223mo left

Started Jun 2015

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress37%
Jun 2015Sep 2044

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2015

Completed
2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 23, 2017

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 16, 2018

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2021

Completed
22.7 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2044

Expected
Last Updated

April 29, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

6.6 years

First QC Date

May 23, 2017

Last Update Submit

April 28, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

MentoringPositive Youth DevelopmentSkills trainingRelationshipsChild Welfare

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

  • Court filings for delinquency immediately post intervention

    Presence of a court filing in administrative records for delinquent behavior

    immediately post-intervention (T2)

  • Court filings for delinquency 15 months-post intervention

    Presence of a court filing in administrative records for delinquent behavior

    15-months-post intervention (T3)

  • Self-reported delinquency immediately post intervention

    The Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors, will assess any delinquency, number of types of delinquency, any violent delinquency, and any non-violent delinquency

    immediately post-intervention (T2)

  • Self-reported delinquency 15 months-post intervention

    The Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors, will assess any delinquency, number of types of delinquency, any violent delinquency, and any non-violent delinquency

    15-months-post intervention (T3)

  • School suspensions immediately post intervention

    Any youth reported school suspensions, assessed by the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors

    immediately post-intervention (T2)

  • School suspensions 15 months-post intervention

    Any youth reported school suspensions, assessed by the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors

    15-months-post intervention (T3)

  • Substance use immediately post intervention

    Self-reported number of types and frequency of substance use as assessed by the substance use scale of the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors

    immediately post-intervention (T2)

  • Substance use 15 months-post intervention

    Self-reported number of types and frequency of substance use as assessed by the substance use scale of the Adolescent Risk Behavior Survey (ARBS), a youth-report measure that assesses engagement in risk behaviors

    15-months-post intervention (T3)

  • Passing grades immediately post intervention

    Youth report of passing all core academic courses, as assessed via researcher developed educational measure

    immediately post-intervention (T2)

  • Passing grades 15 months-post intervention

    Youth report of passing all core academic courses, as assessed via researcher developed educational measure

    15-months-post intervention (T3)

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Quality of Life

    Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  • Extracurricular activity involvement

    Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  • Connectedness to school

    Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  • Academic achievement

    Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  • Perceived Opportunities

    Baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2) and 15-months-post intervention (T3)

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

FHF-T Intervention Group

EXPERIMENTAL

9 months of 1:1 youth mentoring by graduate-student mentors; workshops; educational advocacy

Behavioral: FHF-T

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Services as usual

Interventions

FHF-TBEHAVIORAL

FHF-T employs mentoring, consisting of relationship development, advocating for and empowering youth, and skill-building activities to promote positive youth development. Mentors meet individually for 2-3 hours per week for 30 weeks with each teen they mentor, in order to engage teens in positive youth development activities and provide skills training in areas including emotion recognition, perspective-taking, problem solving, effective communication, managing anger, healthy coping and resisting peer pressure for deviant activities. Youth also attend group workshops over the course of the program, in which they engage with other participants and mentors in skill-building activities.

FHF-T Intervention Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age13 Years - 16 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Teens with open child welfare cases placed in foster care, kinship care or living at home
  • Starting 8th or 9th grade
  • History of child maltreatment according to child welfare and court records
  • Live within 35 minutes of the University of Denver (for mentoring feasibility)

You may not qualify if:

  • Youth with a known history of severe violent behavior and/or sexual perpetration
  • Youth who are deemed unsafe or unable to participate in a community-based mentoring program by their caseworker
  • Incarcerated at baseline
  • Moderate or severe developmental delay or physical disability
  • Youth who are/will be parenting during the prevention program

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Denver

Denver, Colorado, 80208, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Taussig H, Weiler L, Rhodes T, Hambrick E, Wertheimer R, Fireman O, Combs M. Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens: Adaptation of an Evidence-Based Program. J Soc Social Work Res. 2015 Dec;6(4):617-642. doi: 10.1086/684021.

    PMID: 27019678BACKGROUND
  • Taussig, H.N., Bender, K., Bennett, R. Massey Combs, K., Fireman, O, & Wertheimer, R. (2020). Mentoring for teens with child welfare involvement: Permanency outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of the Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens program. Child Welfare, 97(5), 1-24.

    RESULT
  • Taussig, H., Bender, K., Racz, S. & Evidence Based Policy Team, A. V. (2022, April 7). Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens. Retrieved from osf.io/673eu.

    RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Risk-TakingSubstance-Related DisordersAdolescent BehaviorSexual Behavior

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BehaviorChemically-Induced DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Heather Taussig, PhD

    University of Denver

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Kimberly Bender, PhD

    University of Denver

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Research assistants who conduct the interviews are masked to condition.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized controlled trial with 2 groups
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor and Associate Dean for Research

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2017

First Posted

October 16, 2018

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2044

Last Updated

April 29, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share
Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ANALYTIC CODE

Available IPD Datasets

Individual Participant Data Set Access

Locations