Performance Nutrition for Residents and Fellows
1 other identifier
interventional
61
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Currently, residents commonly experience dehydration and poor nutrition during nighttime duty hours as a result of heavy work load, lack of time to take nutrition and hydration breaks, or limited or no access to healthy food and drinks which may affect residents' work performance. The goal of this study is to compare the effects of two different meal compositions with no typical dietary practices (existing conditions) on work performance of the on-call residents during night shifts.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 25, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 5, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 29, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 11, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 11, 2019
CompletedFebruary 15, 2022
January 1, 2022
6 months
September 25, 2018
January 31, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Difference in Motor Praxis scores between conditions
Motor Praxis is a validated neurocognitive test that assesses sensory-motor speed. This test takes approximately 30 seconds to complete and will be measured at two time points (beginning and end of each night shift) in each of the 3 conditions . Differences in accuracy (percentage of correct responses, a higher percentage is better), duration (in milliseconds, lower duration is better), reaction time (in milliseconds, lower reaction time is better) and composite scores (0-1000, higher score is better) will be reported and compared.
Two time points (beginning and end of night shifts) on each night for a total of 3 nights
Difference in Fractal 2-Back between conditions
Fractal 2-Back is a validated neurocognitive test that assess working memory. This test takes approximately 2 minutes to complete and will be measured at two time points (beginning and end of each night shift) in each of the 3 conditions. Differences in reaction time (in milliseconds, lower reaction time is better) , accuracy (percentage of correct responses, a higher percentage is better) and composite scores (0-1000, higher score is better) will be reported and compared.
Two time points (beginning and end of night shifts) on each night for a total of 3 nights
Difference in Balloon Analog Risk between conditions
Balloon Analog Risk is a validated neurocognitive test that assess risk decision making. This test takes approximately 2 minutes to complete and will be measured at two time points (beginning and end of each night shift) in each of the 3 conditions. Differences in risk propensity (higher scores indicative of greater risk-taking propensity), duration (in milliseconds, lower reaction time is better) and composite scores (0-1000, higher score is better) will be reported and compared.
Two time points (beginning and end of night shifts) on each night for a total of 3 nights
Difference in Psychomotor vigilance test between conditions
Psychomotor vigilance test is a validated neurocognitive test that assess vigilant attention. This test takes approximately 3 minutes to complete will be measured at two time points (beginning and end of each night shift) in each of the 3 conditions. Differences in reaction time (in milliseconds, lower reaction time is better), lapses (number, less is better) and composite scores measured (0-1000, higher score is better) will be reported and compared.
Two time points (beginning and end of night shifts) on each night for a total of 3 nights
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Difference in Degree of sleepiness between conditions
Two time points (beginning and end of night shifts) on each night for a total of 3 nights
Other Outcomes (1)
Difference in Work Exhaustion between conditions
Two time points (beginning and end of night shifts) on each night for a total of 3 nights
Study Arms (1)
Dietary Modification
EXPERIMENTALOn the first night of the study, participants can eat and drink as they normally would (no dietary intervention). On second and third nights participants will be provided meals, snacks and drinks with specific macronutrient composition, encouraged to only eat and drink study meals, snacks and drinks, and to avoid eating after 10:00 hours. The composition of the study foods and drinks on nights 2 and 3 will be different.
Interventions
Participants will be provided with meals, snacks and drinks with specific macronutrient compositions and encouraged to only eat and drink study meals, snacks and drinks and to avoid eating after 10:00 hours.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All residents and fellows performing in hospital overnight work
- Must be able to eat plant source foods (e.g. soy, nuts, seeds) and animal source foods (e.g. meat, eggs, dairy products)
You may not qualify if:
- Food allergies or sensitivities
- Prior anaphylactic reaction to food
- Strict dietary restrictions (e.g. vegan, gluten free)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Stanford Universitylead
- American Medical Associationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
Related Publications (9)
Rimmer A. Urgent action is needed to manage doctors' fatigue, says BMA. BMJ. 2018 Jan 9;360:k127. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k127. No abstract available.
PMID: 29317408BACKGROUNDHamidi MS, Boggild MK, Cheung AM. Running on empty: a review of nutrition and physicians' well-being. Postgrad Med J. 2016 Aug;92(1090):478-81. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134131. Epub 2016 May 23.
PMID: 27215232BACKGROUNDGupta CC, Dorrian J, Grant CL, Pajcin M, Coates AM, Kennaway DJ, Wittert GA, Heilbronn LK, Della Vedova CB, Banks S. It's not just what you eat but when: The impact of eating a meal during simulated shift work on driving performance. Chronobiol Int. 2017;34(1):66-77. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2016.1237520. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
PMID: 27736177BACKGROUNDPaech GM, Banks S, Pajcin M, Grant C, Johnson K, Kamimori GH, Vedova CB. Caffeine administration at night during extended wakefulness effectively mitigates performance impairment but not subjective assessments of fatigue and sleepiness. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2016 Jun;145:27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
PMID: 27061779BACKGROUNDGrant CL, Dorrian J, Coates AM, Pajcin M, Kennaway DJ, Wittert GA, Heilbronn LK, Vedova CD, Gupta CC, Banks S. The impact of meal timing on performance, sleepiness, gastric upset, and hunger during simulated night shift. Ind Health. 2017 Oct 7;55(5):423-436. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2017-0047. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
PMID: 28740034BACKGROUNDReyner LA, Wells SJ, Mortlock V, Horne JA. 'Post-lunch' sleepiness during prolonged, monotonous driving - effects of meal size. Physiol Behav. 2012 Feb 28;105(4):1088-91. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.11.025. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
PMID: 22155490BACKGROUNDAttuquayefio T, Stevenson RJ, Oaten MJ, Francis HM. A four-day Western-style dietary intervention causes reductions in hippocampal-dependent learning and memory and interoceptive sensitivity. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 23;12(2):e0172645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172645. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28231304BACKGROUNDEl-Sharkawy AM, Bragg D, Watson P, Neal K, Sahota O, Maughan RJ, Lobo DN. Hydration amongst nurses and doctors on-call (the HANDS on prospective cohort study). Clin Nutr. 2016 Aug;35(4):935-42. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
PMID: 26216194BACKGROUNDMakowski MS, Trockel MT, Menon NK, Wang H, Katznelson L, Shanafelt TD. Performance Nutrition for Physician Trainees Working Overnight Shifts: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Acad Med. 2022 Mar 1;97(3):426-435. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004509.
PMID: 34753859RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tait D Shanafelt, MD
Stanford University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Researchers analyze the data will be blinded to the group assignment.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 25, 2018
First Posted
October 5, 2018
Study Start
October 29, 2018
Primary Completion
May 11, 2019
Study Completion
May 11, 2019
Last Updated
February 15, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
This data is strictly confidential and to protect the privacy of our study participants we will not be sharing the results.