NCT03698123

Brief Summary

Currently, residents commonly experience dehydration and poor nutrition during nighttime duty hours as a result of heavy work load, lack of time to take nutrition and hydration breaks, or limited or no access to healthy food and drinks which may affect residents' work performance. The goal of this study is to compare the effects of two different meal compositions with no typical dietary practices (existing conditions) on work performance of the on-call residents during night shifts.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
61

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 25, 2018

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 5, 2018

Completed
24 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 29, 2018

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 11, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 11, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 15, 2022

Status Verified

January 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

September 25, 2018

Last Update Submit

January 31, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

NutritionPhysician well-beingCognitive performanceSleepinessShift-work

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Difference in Motor Praxis scores between conditions

    Motor Praxis is a validated neurocognitive test that assesses sensory-motor speed. This test takes approximately 30 seconds to complete and will be measured at two time points (beginning and end of each night shift) in each of the 3 conditions . Differences in accuracy (percentage of correct responses, a higher percentage is better), duration (in milliseconds, lower duration is better), reaction time (in milliseconds, lower reaction time is better) and composite scores (0-1000, higher score is better) will be reported and compared.

    Two time points (beginning and end of night shifts) on each night for a total of 3 nights

  • Difference in Fractal 2-Back between conditions

    Fractal 2-Back is a validated neurocognitive test that assess working memory. This test takes approximately 2 minutes to complete and will be measured at two time points (beginning and end of each night shift) in each of the 3 conditions. Differences in reaction time (in milliseconds, lower reaction time is better) , accuracy (percentage of correct responses, a higher percentage is better) and composite scores (0-1000, higher score is better) will be reported and compared.

    Two time points (beginning and end of night shifts) on each night for a total of 3 nights

  • Difference in Balloon Analog Risk between conditions

    Balloon Analog Risk is a validated neurocognitive test that assess risk decision making. This test takes approximately 2 minutes to complete and will be measured at two time points (beginning and end of each night shift) in each of the 3 conditions. Differences in risk propensity (higher scores indicative of greater risk-taking propensity), duration (in milliseconds, lower reaction time is better) and composite scores (0-1000, higher score is better) will be reported and compared.

    Two time points (beginning and end of night shifts) on each night for a total of 3 nights

  • Difference in Psychomotor vigilance test between conditions

    Psychomotor vigilance test is a validated neurocognitive test that assess vigilant attention. This test takes approximately 3 minutes to complete will be measured at two time points (beginning and end of each night shift) in each of the 3 conditions. Differences in reaction time (in milliseconds, lower reaction time is better), lapses (number, less is better) and composite scores measured (0-1000, higher score is better) will be reported and compared.

    Two time points (beginning and end of night shifts) on each night for a total of 3 nights

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference in Degree of sleepiness between conditions

    Two time points (beginning and end of night shifts) on each night for a total of 3 nights

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Difference in Work Exhaustion between conditions

    Two time points (beginning and end of night shifts) on each night for a total of 3 nights

Study Arms (1)

Dietary Modification

EXPERIMENTAL

On the first night of the study, participants can eat and drink as they normally would (no dietary intervention). On second and third nights participants will be provided meals, snacks and drinks with specific macronutrient composition, encouraged to only eat and drink study meals, snacks and drinks, and to avoid eating after 10:00 hours. The composition of the study foods and drinks on nights 2 and 3 will be different.

Other: Dietary Modification

Interventions

Participants will be provided with meals, snacks and drinks with specific macronutrient compositions and encouraged to only eat and drink study meals, snacks and drinks and to avoid eating after 10:00 hours.

Dietary Modification

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All residents and fellows performing in hospital overnight work
  • Must be able to eat plant source foods (e.g. soy, nuts, seeds) and animal source foods (e.g. meat, eggs, dairy products)

You may not qualify if:

  • Food allergies or sensitivities
  • Prior anaphylactic reaction to food
  • Strict dietary restrictions (e.g. vegan, gluten free)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Stanford University

Stanford, California, 94305, United States

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Rimmer A. Urgent action is needed to manage doctors' fatigue, says BMA. BMJ. 2018 Jan 9;360:k127. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k127. No abstract available.

    PMID: 29317408BACKGROUND
  • Hamidi MS, Boggild MK, Cheung AM. Running on empty: a review of nutrition and physicians' well-being. Postgrad Med J. 2016 Aug;92(1090):478-81. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134131. Epub 2016 May 23.

    PMID: 27215232BACKGROUND
  • Gupta CC, Dorrian J, Grant CL, Pajcin M, Coates AM, Kennaway DJ, Wittert GA, Heilbronn LK, Della Vedova CB, Banks S. It's not just what you eat but when: The impact of eating a meal during simulated shift work on driving performance. Chronobiol Int. 2017;34(1):66-77. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2016.1237520. Epub 2016 Oct 13.

    PMID: 27736177BACKGROUND
  • Paech GM, Banks S, Pajcin M, Grant C, Johnson K, Kamimori GH, Vedova CB. Caffeine administration at night during extended wakefulness effectively mitigates performance impairment but not subjective assessments of fatigue and sleepiness. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2016 Jun;145:27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Apr 7.

    PMID: 27061779BACKGROUND
  • Grant CL, Dorrian J, Coates AM, Pajcin M, Kennaway DJ, Wittert GA, Heilbronn LK, Vedova CD, Gupta CC, Banks S. The impact of meal timing on performance, sleepiness, gastric upset, and hunger during simulated night shift. Ind Health. 2017 Oct 7;55(5):423-436. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2017-0047. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

    PMID: 28740034BACKGROUND
  • Reyner LA, Wells SJ, Mortlock V, Horne JA. 'Post-lunch' sleepiness during prolonged, monotonous driving - effects of meal size. Physiol Behav. 2012 Feb 28;105(4):1088-91. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.11.025. Epub 2011 Dec 6.

    PMID: 22155490BACKGROUND
  • Attuquayefio T, Stevenson RJ, Oaten MJ, Francis HM. A four-day Western-style dietary intervention causes reductions in hippocampal-dependent learning and memory and interoceptive sensitivity. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 23;12(2):e0172645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172645. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 28231304BACKGROUND
  • El-Sharkawy AM, Bragg D, Watson P, Neal K, Sahota O, Maughan RJ, Lobo DN. Hydration amongst nurses and doctors on-call (the HANDS on prospective cohort study). Clin Nutr. 2016 Aug;35(4):935-42. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Jul 16.

    PMID: 26216194BACKGROUND
  • Makowski MS, Trockel MT, Menon NK, Wang H, Katznelson L, Shanafelt TD. Performance Nutrition for Physician Trainees Working Overnight Shifts: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Acad Med. 2022 Mar 1;97(3):426-435. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004509.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Feeding BehaviorSleep DeprivationSleepiness

Interventions

Diet Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior, AnimalBehaviorDyssomniasSleep Wake DisordersNervous System DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Nutrition TherapyTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Tait D Shanafelt, MD

    Stanford University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
Researchers analyze the data will be blinded to the group assignment.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Study participants will participate in the study 3 nights with one control night and two dietary interventions nights.The order of the 2 dietary intervention groups will be randomized per block. There are two possible combinations and the order will be randomized using a computer-generated random-number sequence. There will be at least a 24-hour wash-out period between study nights to minimize the carry-over effects of the cross-over design as well as learning effects of the computerized cognitive tests. A: Control- no intervention, B: intervention 1 arm, C: Intervention 2 The order of the blocks will be randomized. block a: A, B, C block b: A, C, B
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2018

First Posted

October 5, 2018

Study Start

October 29, 2018

Primary Completion

May 11, 2019

Study Completion

May 11, 2019

Last Updated

February 15, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

This data is strictly confidential and to protect the privacy of our study participants we will not be sharing the results.

Locations