The Combining rTMS With Visual Feedback Training for Patients With Stroke
rTMS
Investigating the Effects of Combining rTMS With Visual Feedback Training to Improve Movements in the Paretic Lower Limb and Gait Performance
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
After stroke, patients often experience motor deficits that interrupt normal lower extremity movement and gait function. Recent developments in neuroimaging have focus on the reasons why some patients recover well while some do poorly. However, there is still no consensus on the exact mechanisms involved in regaining the functions after rehabilitation. Application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to facilitate neural plasticity during stroke treatment has recently gained considerable attention. The possible mechanism through which rTMS acts is based on the interhemispheric competition (IHC) model, which explains that patients with stroke experience alterations in cortical excitability and exhibit abnormally high interhemispheric inhibition from the unaffected hemisphere to the affected hemisphere. The visual feedback training can improve postural control and enhance motor performance. Several rTMS studies have evaluated the lower extremity dysfunction following stroke, but few studies have explored the efficacy of applying rTMS on the lower extremities. We expect the study can help us to further exploration of the change of clinical function and cortical excitability following rTMS and visual feedback training in subjects with stroke. In addition, the results of this project will be provided for further rehabilitation programs in people with stroke.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started Jan 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 5, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 27, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 28, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2019
CompletedJanuary 18, 2023
September 1, 2018
2.5 years
September 27, 2018
January 15, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change of Motor evoked potential
Measurement of motor evoked potential of anterior tibialis
Change from baseline to 4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Chang of Motor Assessment Score
Change from baseline to 4 weeks
Chang of Berg Balance Test
Change from baseline to 4 weeks
Chang of Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower Limb section
Change from baseline to 4 weeks
Chang of Modified barthel index
Change from baseline to 4 weeks
Chang of Time Up and Go
Change from baseline to 4 weeks
Study Arms (3)
rTMS+visual feedback
EXPERIMENTAL10-minute rTMS and then a 30-minute visual feedback training ,3 times a week, for 4 weeks
sham rTMS+visual feedback
ACTIVE COMPARATOR10-minute sham rTMS and then a 30-minute visual feedback training ,3 times a week, for 4 weeks
sham rTMS+traditional training
ACTIVE COMPARATOR10-minute sham rTMS and then a 30-minute traditional rehabilitation training,3 times a week, for 4 weeks
Interventions
The EMG measured the MEPs of the anterior tibialis in response to the TMS delivered using a Magstim Rapid2 stimulator (Magstim Co, Ltd, Carmarthenshire, Wales, UK) with a 70-mm figure-8 coil (maximum power, 2.2 T) over the contralateral M1. The intensity was initially set at 100% of the machine output (MO) to determine the optimal stimulation site (hotspot). The hotspot was marked on the scalp with oil ink and recorded as x, y, in centimeters from the vertex (cz). The participants received real rTMS or sham rTMS, respectively (1 Hz, 10 min), which was before a 30-minute visual feedback training and/or traditional rehabilitation training.
Game-based visual feedback training system and software.The system was designed to enable the subjects to perform ankle movements in multiple axes.
30 min traditional rehabilitation. The traditional rehabilitation programs included balance training, postural training, muscle strengthening, ambulation training and etc..
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Monohemispheric ischemic or hemorrhage stroke
- Subjects with first-ever stroke 3.6 months after stroke onset
- The Brunnstrom stage of lower limb \>Ⅲ 5.\>23 in the mini-mental state exam 6.The Modified Ashworth Scale of lower limb \<3 7.Clear consciousness can meet the relevant assessments
You may not qualify if:
- Recurrent stoke
- Severe spasticity of lower limb and difficult to perform isolative movement.
- History of seizures or epileptic
- Have implanted ferromagnetic devices or other magnetic-sensitive metal implants
- Concomitant vestibular and cerebellum diseases
- Joint contracture of lower limb/foot and other orthopedic problems
- Subjects with severe cognitive impairment
- Subjects with depression and/or mood disorder
- Presence of any comorbid neurological diseases or psychological diseases
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Taipei Medical University Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cheng Hsien-Lin, Master
Taipei Medical University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor)
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2018
First Posted
September 28, 2018
Study Start
January 5, 2017
Primary Completion
June 30, 2019
Study Completion
July 31, 2019
Last Updated
January 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2018-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share