Using Artificial Intelligence-platform on Plaque Control and Periodontal Treatment Outcome in Patients With Periodontal Disease-Preliminary Results
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of an AI dental monitoring intervention on patients' periodontal disease, preventive behaviors and motivation. This randomized controlled trial included experimental group: AI group (EG-A), AI-humanized group (EG-B) and control group(CG), respectively. The EG-A and EG-B received AI dental monitoring intervention by taking mouth image at home once a week for six month. Baseline and follow-up surveys were used to collect the data in periodontal index, periodontal preventive behavior and motivation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 16, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 24, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 28, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedFebruary 6, 2025
February 1, 2025
6.1 years
September 24, 2020
February 4, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (15)
gingival index (GI)
The gingiva inflammation status of 6 tooth was recorded using the gingiva index, as follows: 0 = No inflammation. 1. = Mild inflammation, slight change in color, slight edema, no bleeding on probing 2. = Moderate inflammation, moderate glazing, redness, bleeding on probing 3. = Severe inflammation, marked redness and hypertrophy, ulceration, tendency to spontaneous bleeding. For each patient, GI will measured by the teeth 12,16,24,32,36,44
Change from Baseline GI at 1-month after intervention
gingival index (GI)
The gingiva inflammation status of 6 tooth was recorded using the gingiva index, as follows: 0 = No inflammation. 1. = Mild inflammation, slight change in color, slight edema, no bleeding on probing 2. = Moderate inflammation, moderate glazing, redness, bleeding on probing 3. = Severe inflammation, marked redness and hypertrophy, ulceration, tendency to spontaneous bleeding. For each patient, GI will measured by the teeth 12,16,24,32,36,44
Change from Baseline GI at 3-month after intervention
gingival index (GI)
The gingiva inflammation status of 6 tooth was recorded using the gingiva index, as follows: 0 = No inflammation. 1. = Mild inflammation, slight change in color, slight edema, no bleeding on probing 2. = Moderate inflammation, moderate glazing, redness, bleeding on probing 3. = Severe inflammation, marked redness and hypertrophy, ulceration, tendency to spontaneous bleeding. For each patient, GI will measured by the teeth 12,16,24,32,36,44
Change from Baseline GI at 6-month after intervention
plaque index (PI)
The plaque status of 6 tooth was recorded using the plaque index, as followes: 0 = No plaque 1. = Thin film of plaque, scraped with explorer 2. = Moderate amount of plaque, visible with naked eyes 3. = Abundance of soft matter within the gingival pocket and/or on the tooth and gingival margin. For each patient, PI will measured by the teeth 12,16,24,32,36,44
Change from Baseline PI at 1-month after intervention
plaque index (PI)
The plaque status of 6 tooth was recorded using the plaque index, as followes: 0 = No plaque 1. = Thin film of plaque, scraped with explorer 2. = Moderate amount of plaque, visible with naked eyes 3. = Abundance of soft matter within the gingival pocket and/or on the tooth and gingival margin. For each patient, PI will measured by the teeth 12,16,24,32,36,44
Change from Baseline PI at 3-month after intervention
plaque index (PI)
The plaque status of 6 tooth was recorded using the plaque index, as followes: 0 = No plaque 1. = Thin film of plaque, scraped with explorer 2. = Moderate amount of plaque, visible with naked eyes 3. = Abundance of soft matter within the gingival pocket and/or on the tooth and gingival margin. For each patient, PI will measured by the teeth 12,16,24,32,36,44
Change from Baseline PI at 6-month after intervention
Probing Pocket Depth (PPD)
Using periodontal probe to measure the depth from the bottom of the periodontal pocket to the gingival margin. For each patient, PPD will measured each teeth.
Change from Baseline PPD at 1-month after intervention
Probing Pocket Depth (PPD)
Using periodontal probe to measure the depth from the bottom of the periodontal pocket to the gingival margin. For each patient, PPD will measured each teeth.
Change from Baseline PPD at 3-month after intervention
Probing Pocket Depth (PPD)
Using periodontal probe to measure the depth from the bottom of the periodontal pocket to the gingival margin. For each patient, PPD will measured each teeth.
Change from Baseline PPD at 6-month after intervention
Clinical Attachment Loss(CAL)
Using periodontal probe to measure the distance from the enamel-dentin junction to the bottom of the periodontal pocket. For each patient, CAL will measured each teeth.
Change from Baseline CAL at 1-month after intervention
Clinical Attachment Loss(CAL)
Using periodontal probe to measure the distance from the enamel-dentin junction to the bottom of the periodontal pocket. For each patient, CAL will measured each teeth.
Change from Baseline CAL at 3-month after intervention
Clinical Attachment Loss(CAL)
Using periodontal probe to measure the distance from the enamel-dentin junction to the bottom of the periodontal pocket. For each patient, CAL will measured each teeth.
Change from Baseline CAL at 6-month after intervention
Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) scores
Item including that "I think periodontal disease is a serious disease" "If I do not have periodontal disease prevention behavior, the risk of developing periodontal disease in the future is very high" "If I stick to periodontal disease prevention behavior, it will improve my oral health" "I believe that I can follow the periodontal health guidance" "I find it hard to remember/hard to do periodontal health care guidance" "Periodontal disease bothers me" "I want to complete my personal periodontal disease prevention behavior plan" All the items' scores ranged from one to ten, with higher scores indicating a higher level of motivation toward change behaviors. Cronbach's α was 0.70 for this scale.The scores ranged from one ("impossible") to ten ("very possible"), with the total possible score ranging from seven to seventy.
Change from Baseline PMT at 1-month after intervention
Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) scores
Item including that "I think periodontal disease is a serious disease" "If I do not have periodontal disease prevention behavior, the risk of developing periodontal disease in the future is very high" "If I stick to periodontal disease prevention behavior, it will improve my oral health" "I believe that I can follow the periodontal health guidance" "I find it hard to remember/hard to do periodontal health care guidance" "Periodontal disease bothers me" "I want to complete my personal periodontal disease prevention behavior plan" All the items' scores ranged from one to ten, with higher scores indicating a higher level of motivation toward change behaviors. Cronbach's α was 0.70 for this scale.The scores ranged from one ("impossible") to ten ("very possible"), with the total possible score ranging from seven to seventy.
Change from Baseline PMT at 3-month after intervention
Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) scores
Item including that "I think periodontal disease is a serious disease" "If I do not have periodontal disease prevention behavior, the risk of developing periodontal disease in the future is very high" "If I stick to periodontal disease prevention behavior, it will improve my oral health" "I believe that I can follow the periodontal health guidance" "I find it hard to remember/hard to do periodontal health care guidance" "Periodontal disease bothers me" "I want to complete my personal periodontal disease prevention behavior plan" All the items' scores ranged from one to ten, with higher scores indicating a higher level of motivation toward change behaviors. Cronbach's α was 0.70 for this scale. The scores ranged from one ("impossible") to ten ("very possible"), with the total possible score ranging from seven to seventy.
Change from Baseline PMT at 6-month after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (6)
oral self-care behavior
Change from Baseline at 1 month after intervention
oral self-care behavior
Change from Baseline at 3 month after intervention
oral self-care behavior
Change from Baseline at 6 month after intervention
OHIP-14T scales
Change from Baseline at 1 month after intervention
OHIP-14T scales
Change from Baseline at 3 month after intervention
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Experimental group A (AI Group: EG-A)
EXPERIMENTALBehavioral: AI intervention For the EG-A, a AI scan box will give to patients that taking mouth image at home once a week until six-month. The AI will send automated message to patients' mobile phone telling about their oral hygiene condition, gum condition, tooth condition.
Experimental group B (AI with humanized Group: EG-B)
EXPERIMENTALBehavioral: AI intervention For the EG-B,a AI scan box will give to patients that taking mouth image at home once a week until six-month. The AI will send automated message to patients' mobile phone telling about their oral hygiene condition, gum condition, tooth condition. The humanized counseling will also send to patients' mobile phone about each patients oral hygiene condition and advises.
Control group (CG)
NO INTERVENTIONthe control group(CG) only have standard oral hygiene education
Interventions
DM is the first APP system used in orthopedics patients in the world,it has been widely used in Asian countries (Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan, etc.) and has been used by 2140 patients so far. DM allows patients to take in-mouth photos at home, and uses AI as a background analysis to evaluate the patient's current oral condition (including oral hygiene and gum status) based on the photo.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 35-65 years old
- Diagnosed periodontal disease by dentist (Comprehensive Periodontal Treatment Project)
- More than 16 functional teeth
You may not qualify if:
- Have received periodontal treatment within 3 months
- Patient has disease related to periodontal disease (ex. Drug-related excessive gum growth or blood clotting problems, pregnancy, mental illness)
- Disability patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Related Publications (1)
Shen KL, Huang CL, Lin YC, Du JK, Chen FL, Kabasawa Y, Chen CC, Huang HL. Effects of artificial intelligence-assisted dental monitoring intervention in patients with periodontitis: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2022 Oct;49(10):988-998. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13675. Epub 2022 Jul 10.
PMID: 35713224DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 24, 2020
First Posted
September 28, 2020
Study Start
November 16, 2019
Primary Completion
December 31, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
February 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02