FALCOn (Facteur AnthropoLogique Cancer Orl)
FALCOn
1 other identifier
observational
206
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There are no studies on practitioner-related factors influencing decision-making in the field of carcinology of aerodigestive carcinomas. The objective of the study is to determine what are the anthropo-sociological factors in the surgeon, the oncologists and radiotherapists influencing decision making in ear, nose, and throat carcinology. Special attention will be paid to the practitioner's gender, age, geographical origin, place and institution of training, place of practice, volume of patients treated, access to or without reconstruction by microsurgery, his tendency or aversion to risk taking.
- Secondary objectives : Identify if certain patient profiles may lead to heterogeneous treatment decisions i.e. Human Papillomavirus status, age, comorbidities, autonomy, etc.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2018
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 10, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2019
CompletedMarch 3, 2020
July 1, 2018
4 months
July 20, 2018
March 2, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of the anthropological, socio-cultural and psychological factors of the practitioners which condition the decision making for the patients with aero-digestive carcinomas.
An analysis using a classification method will define a typology of therapeutic choices given their aggression and potential risk. These typologies of prescriptions will then be confronted with the characteristics of physicians in terms of propensity for risk taking and their socio-demographic characteristics using a chi2 test (univariate) and a logistic regression (or polynomial if a binary typology cannot be released (multivariate). Variability of choice and influence of physician characteristics on these choices will also be analyzed based on patient characteristics Expected results : * Impact of socio-professional characteristics on the decision-making in oncology of aerodigestive carcinomas. * Impact of psychological factors ie tendency to take risk
2018, September to December
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Determination of clinical recommendations choices of the health practitioners for different clinical cases of aerodigestive carcinomas
2018, September to December
Self assessment of willingness to take risk (by health practitioners themselves)
2018, September to December
Evaluation of health practitioners' risk attitude
2018, September to December
Evaluation of health practitioners' uncertainty attitude
2018, September to December
Evaluation of health practitioners' rationality attitude
2018, September to December
Interventions
The objective of the study is to determine what are the anthropo-sociological factors in the surgeon, the oncologists and radiotherapists influencing decision making in ENT carcinology.
Eligibility Criteria
Aerodigestive carcinomas surgeons, oncologists specializing in oncology of aerodigestive carcinomas, radiation therapists specialized in oncology of VADS exercising in France. Email addresses accessible via GETTEC / GORTEC / GERCOR / SFORL / UNICANCER.
You may qualify if:
- Ear, nose and throat surgeons, oncologists specializing in oncology of aerodigestive carcinomas, radiation therapists specialized in oncology of aerodigestive carcinomas exercising in France
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Institut Claudius Regaudlead
- Onco-Occitanie (Toulouse)collaborator
- University Hospital, Caencollaborator
- Centre Francois Baclessecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Institut Claudius Regaud
Toulouse, Occitanie, 31059, France
Related Publications (13)
Krahenmann-Muller S, Virgini VS, Blum MR, da Costa BR, Collet TH, Martin Y, Cornuz J, Zimmerli L, Gaspoz JM, Bauer DC, Kerr EA, Aujesky D, Rodondi N. Patient and physician gender concordance in preventive care in university primary care settings. Prev Med. 2014 Oct;67:242-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 10.
PMID: 25117521RESULTAndersen MR, Urban N. Physician gender and screening: do patient differences account for differences in mammography use? Women Health. 1997;26(1):29-39. doi: 10.1300/J013v26n01_03.
PMID: 9311098RESULTFranks P, Clancy CM. Physician gender bias in clinical decisionmaking: screening for cancer in primary care. Med Care. 1993 Mar;31(3):213-8. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199303000-00003.
PMID: 8450679RESULTFrank E, Harvey LK. Prevention advice rates of women and men physicians. Arch Fam Med. 1996 Apr;5(4):215-9. doi: 10.1001/archfami.5.4.215.
PMID: 8769910RESULTArrington AK, Jarosek SL, Virnig BA, Habermann EB, Tuttle TM. Patient and surgeon characteristics associated with increased use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Oct;16(10):2697-704. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0641-z. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
PMID: 19653045RESULTTsugawa Y, Jena AB, Figueroa JF, Orav EJ, Blumenthal DM, Jha AK. Comparison of Hospital Mortality and Readmission Rates for Medicare Patients Treated by Male vs Female Physicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):206-213. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7875.
PMID: 27992617RESULTMehrotra A, Reid RO, Adams JL, Friedberg MW, McGlynn EA, Hussey PS. Physicians with the least experience have higher cost profiles than do physicians with the most experience. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Nov;31(11):2453-63. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0252.
PMID: 23129676RESULTMeier P, Duvernoy CS. Influence of gender of physicians and patients on guideline-recommended treatment of chronic heart failure in a cross-sectional study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009 Jun;11(6):631; author reply 631-2. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfp056. Epub 2009 Apr 27. No abstract available.
PMID: 19398490RESULTBerthold HK, Gouni-Berthold I, Bestehorn KP, Bohm M, Krone W. Physician gender is associated with the quality of type 2 diabetes care. J Intern Med. 2008 Oct;264(4):340-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.01967.x. Epub 2008 Apr 4.
PMID: 18397244RESULTReid RO, Friedberg MW, Adams JL, McGlynn EA, Mehrotra A. Associations between physician characteristics and quality of care. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Sep 13;170(16):1442-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.307.
PMID: 20837830RESULTSchieber AC, Delpierre C, Lepage B, Afrite A, Pascal J, Cases C, Lombrail P, Lang T, Kelly-Irving M; INTERMEDE group. Do gender differences affect the doctor-patient interaction during consultations in general practice? Results from the INTERMEDE study. Fam Pract. 2014 Dec;31(6):706-13. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmu057. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
PMID: 25214508RESULTAllais, M. (1953). L'extension des théories de l'équilibre économique général et du rendement social au cas du risque. Econometrica, Journal of the Econometric Society, 269-290.
RESULTChabrillac E, Lamy S, Grosclaude P, Cros F, Vairel B, Sarini J, Vergez S, Nebout A, Bories P, Dupret-Bories A. The impact of physician's characteristics on decision-making inhead and neck oncology: Results of a national survey. Oral Oncol. 2022 Jun;129:105895. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.105895. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
PMID: 35500434DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Agnès DUPRET-BORIES, PhD
Institut Claudius Regaud
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- ECOLOGIC OR COMMUNITY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 20, 2018
First Posted
September 10, 2018
Study Start
September 15, 2018
Primary Completion
December 31, 2018
Study Completion
May 31, 2019
Last Updated
March 3, 2020
Record last verified: 2018-07