Esmolol vs. Labetalol in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
Blood Loss and Visibility With Esmolol vs. Labetalol in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare esmolol and labetalol bleeding and intra-operative visibility scores in functional endoscopic sinus surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Mar 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 7, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 8, 2021
CompletedFebruary 8, 2021
March 1, 2017
1.1 years
August 30, 2018
May 20, 2019
January 19, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Intra-operative Surgical Visibility - Boezaart Scale
Standardized scoring systems used by surgeons to rate surgical field quality in FESS: Boezaart scale (0-5): 0 = no bleeding (optimal) 1. = slight bleeding with no suction required 2. = slight bleeding with occasional suctioning required 3. = slight bleeding with frequent suctioning required 4. = moderate bleeding with frequent suctioning required and surgical field visibility is compromised when suctioning is removed 5. = severe bleeding (worst) with constant suctioning required and compromised view
Duration of operation
Intra-operative Surgical Visibility - Wormald Scale
Standardized scoring systems used by surgeons to rate surgical field quality in FESS: Wormald scale (0-10): 0 = No bleeding (optimal) 1. = 1-2 points of blood ooze 2. = 3-4 points of ooze 3. = 5-6 points of ooze 4. = 7-8 points of ooze 5. = 9-10 points of ooze 6. = \>10 points of ooze, obscuring field 7. = Mild field bleeding with slow post-nasal accumulation 8. = Moderate field bleeding with moderate post-nasal accumulation 9. = Moderate-severe field bleeding with rapid post-nasal accumulation 10. = Severe bleeding (worst) with nose filling rapidly
Duration of operation up to 3 hours
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Rate of Blood Loss
Duration of operation up to 3 hours
Average Mean Arterial Blood Pressure
Duration of operation up 3 hours/completion of operation
Average Heart Rate
Duration of operation up to 3 hours/completion of surgery
Study Arms (2)
Esmolol
EXPERIMENTALPatients receiving esmolol when intra-operative MAP \> 80 mmHg.
Labetalol
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receiving labetalol when intra-operative MAP \> 80 mmHg
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- History of CRS with or without nasal polyps
- Undergoing FESS for CRS
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 (healthy) or 2 (patient with mild systemic disease).
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Asthma
- COPD
- Bradycardia
- Heart failure
- End stage renal disease
- Cerebrovascular accident
- Diabetes mellitus
- Preoperative use of NSAIDs, aspirin, or beta-blockers
- Body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m2.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas, 77550, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Mohamad Chaaban
- Organization
- University of Texas Medical Branch - Galveston
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamad Chaaban, MD
University of Texas
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 30, 2018
First Posted
September 7, 2018
Study Start
March 1, 2017
Primary Completion
March 30, 2018
Study Completion
March 30, 2018
Last Updated
February 8, 2021
Results First Posted
February 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- 3 months to 3 years at time of publication (if applicable)