NCT02841241

Brief Summary

This is a prospective, single arm, "roll-in" study of esmolol infusion for patients with septic shock with persistent tachycardia after adequate intravenous volume expansion. The study will evaluate the adequacy and efficiency of study protocols for the anticipated, main ECASSS study, which will have a separate entry in clinicaltrials.gov.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
7

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2016

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 14, 2016

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 22, 2016

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2017

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 9, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

January 9, 2019

Status Verified

December 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

July 14, 2016

Results QC Date

August 7, 2018

Last Update Submit

December 20, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

esmololadrenergic stormseptic shock

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Organ-failure-free Days

    As of day 28, the number of calendar days on which the patient receives none of (a) vasopressor therapy, (b) mechanical ventilation, or (c) renal replacement therapy. If the patients dies on or before day 28, they have -1 organ-failure-free days. The resulting point-based score combines the probability of death and the number of days without organ failure. Score of -1 = Death before day 28 (Lowest Score). Score of 28 = Patient has been successful at going 28 without any vasopressor therapy/mechanical ventilation/renal replacement therapy (Highest Score)

    Day 28

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • All-cause Mortality

    90 days

  • Peak Serum High-sensitivity Troponin

    Troponin is measured on day 0 and day 1 (first day of esmolol infusion is day 0)

  • Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain at 24 Hours

    Day 1

  • Development of Heart Block

    for duration of esmolol infusion, an expected average of 2 days

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Proportion of Compliance With Final Safety Check

    Day 0

  • Percentage Hourly Checks During Which Protocol Compliance Was Observed

    for duration of esmolol infusion, an expected average of 2 days

  • Number of Participants With Intolerance to Esmolol Infusion at Any Given Rate

    duration of esmolol infusion (~2 days)

Study Arms (1)

Esmolol

EXPERIMENTAL

Esmolol infusion, started without bolus, with slow upward titration to a maximum infusion rate is protocolized, with a target heart rate of 80-90/min

Drug: Esmolol

Interventions

Esmolol infusion

Also known as: Brevibloc
Esmolol

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Within 48 hours of admission to the ICU and septic shock (sepsis present at time of admission)
  • a. Septic shock defined by consensus criteria as i. At least two systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria ii. Suspected or documented infection iii. Receiving vasopressors to treat hypotension after at least 20 ml/kg intravenous crystalloid volume expansion
  • Receiving vasopressors through a central venous catheter for more than 60 minutes.
  • Arterial catheter in place or expected to be placed imminently.
  • Heart rate \> 90/min while receiving vasopressors for more than 60 minutes.
  • Adequately volume expanded, as manifest by any of the following, performed as part of routine clinical care (i.e., no study procedures will be performed before signed consent). If none of these measures are clinically available, the clinical attending must confirm that volume expansion is adequate. (After enrollment, a final safety check will confirm the adequacy of volume expansion.)
  • Central venous pressure (CVP) \> 15 mm Hg.
  • Negative Passive-Leg Raise (PLR) maneuver (\<10% increase in cardiac output after PLR).
  • No cardiac output response (\<10% increase) after rapid infusion (\<5 min) of 250 ml of IV crystalloid, i.e., a graded volume expansion challenge (GVEC).
  • For patients who happen to be breathing passively on a positive pressure mechanical ventilator delivering at least 8 ml/kg tidal volumes and in normal sinus rhythm, stroke volume variability \<10% (such patients are acknowledged to be uncommon; the protocol does not recommend or require the induction of passive breathing).

You may not qualify if:

  • Lack of informed consent.
  • Currently receiving ECMO (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation).
  • Known pregnancy or nursing.
  • Patient is a prisoner.
  • Patient on hospice (or equivalent comfort care approach) at or before the time of enrollment.
  • Known or current atrial fibrillation.
  • Previously enrolled in the trial.
  • Known allergy to esmolol or vehicle
  • Receipt of nodal blocking agents within three half lives
  • Hemoglobin \< 7 gm/dl.
  • Cardiac arrest within 24 hours.
  • Pulmonary hypertension (moderate or severe), from documented history of prior right heart catheterization or current evidence on TTE (transthoracic echocardiography) of any of the following
  • mPAP (mean pulmonary artery pressure) ≥ 35 mmHg
  • SPAP (systolic pulmonary artery pressure)≥ 60 mmHg
  • Cardiovascular collapse, as manifested by inability to achieve a MAP (mean arterial pressure) of 65 mmHg with vasopressor therapy.
  • +19 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Intermountain Medical Center and Intermountain Clinics

Murray, Utah, 84143, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Rudiger A, Singer M. The heart in sepsis: from basic mechanisms to clinical management. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2013 Mar 1;11(2):187-95.

    PMID: 23506497BACKGROUND
  • Novotny NM, Lahm T, Markel TA, Crisostomo PR, Wang M, Wang Y, Ray R, Tan J, Al-Azzawi D, Meldrum DR. beta-Blockers in sepsis: reexamining the evidence. Shock. 2009 Feb;31(2):113-9. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e318180ffb6.

    PMID: 18636043BACKGROUND
  • Oberbeck R, Kobbe P. Beta-adrenergic antagonists: indications and potential immunomodulatory side effects in the critically ill. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16(9):1082-90. doi: 10.2174/092986709787581770.

    PMID: 19275613BACKGROUND
  • Morelli A, Ertmer C, Westphal M, Rehberg S, Kampmeier T, Ligges S, Orecchioni A, D'Egidio A, D'Ippoliti F, Raffone C, Venditti M, Guarracino F, Girardis M, Tritapepe L, Pietropaoli P, Mebazaa A, Singer M. Effect of heart rate control with esmolol on hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013 Oct 23;310(16):1683-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278477.

    PMID: 24108526BACKGROUND
  • Brown SM, Beesley SJ, Lanspa MJ, Grissom CK, Wilson EL, Parikh SM, Sarge T, Talmor D, Banner-Goodspeed V, Novack V, Thompson BT, Shahul S; Esmolol to Control Adrenergic Storm in Septic Shock-ROLL-IN (ECASSS-R) study. Esmolol infusion in patients with septic shock and tachycardia: a prospective, single-arm, feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Aug 3;4:132. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0321-5. eCollection 2018.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Shock, Septic

Interventions

esmolol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

SepsisInfectionsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsShock

Results Point of Contact

Title
Office of Research
Organization
Intermountain Medical Center

Study Officials

  • Samuel Brown, MD,MS

    Intermountain Health Care, Inc.

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2016

First Posted

July 22, 2016

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion

March 1, 2017

Study Completion

March 1, 2017

Last Updated

January 9, 2019

Results First Posted

January 9, 2019

Record last verified: 2018-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations