Esmolol Infusion for Patients With Septic Shock and Persistent Tachycardia
ECASSS-R
Esmolol to Control Adrenergic Storm in Septic Shock - Roll-in
1 other identifier
interventional
7
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, single arm, "roll-in" study of esmolol infusion for patients with septic shock with persistent tachycardia after adequate intravenous volume expansion. The study will evaluate the adequacy and efficiency of study protocols for the anticipated, main ECASSS study, which will have a separate entry in clinicaltrials.gov.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Apr 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 14, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 9, 2019
CompletedJanuary 9, 2019
December 1, 2018
11 months
July 14, 2016
August 7, 2018
December 20, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Organ-failure-free Days
As of day 28, the number of calendar days on which the patient receives none of (a) vasopressor therapy, (b) mechanical ventilation, or (c) renal replacement therapy. If the patients dies on or before day 28, they have -1 organ-failure-free days. The resulting point-based score combines the probability of death and the number of days without organ failure. Score of -1 = Death before day 28 (Lowest Score). Score of 28 = Patient has been successful at going 28 without any vasopressor therapy/mechanical ventilation/renal replacement therapy (Highest Score)
Day 28
Secondary Outcomes (4)
All-cause Mortality
90 days
Peak Serum High-sensitivity Troponin
Troponin is measured on day 0 and day 1 (first day of esmolol infusion is day 0)
Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain at 24 Hours
Day 1
Development of Heart Block
for duration of esmolol infusion, an expected average of 2 days
Other Outcomes (3)
Proportion of Compliance With Final Safety Check
Day 0
Percentage Hourly Checks During Which Protocol Compliance Was Observed
for duration of esmolol infusion, an expected average of 2 days
Number of Participants With Intolerance to Esmolol Infusion at Any Given Rate
duration of esmolol infusion (~2 days)
Study Arms (1)
Esmolol
EXPERIMENTALEsmolol infusion, started without bolus, with slow upward titration to a maximum infusion rate is protocolized, with a target heart rate of 80-90/min
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Within 48 hours of admission to the ICU and septic shock (sepsis present at time of admission)
- a. Septic shock defined by consensus criteria as i. At least two systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria ii. Suspected or documented infection iii. Receiving vasopressors to treat hypotension after at least 20 ml/kg intravenous crystalloid volume expansion
- Receiving vasopressors through a central venous catheter for more than 60 minutes.
- Arterial catheter in place or expected to be placed imminently.
- Heart rate \> 90/min while receiving vasopressors for more than 60 minutes.
- Adequately volume expanded, as manifest by any of the following, performed as part of routine clinical care (i.e., no study procedures will be performed before signed consent). If none of these measures are clinically available, the clinical attending must confirm that volume expansion is adequate. (After enrollment, a final safety check will confirm the adequacy of volume expansion.)
- Central venous pressure (CVP) \> 15 mm Hg.
- Negative Passive-Leg Raise (PLR) maneuver (\<10% increase in cardiac output after PLR).
- No cardiac output response (\<10% increase) after rapid infusion (\<5 min) of 250 ml of IV crystalloid, i.e., a graded volume expansion challenge (GVEC).
- For patients who happen to be breathing passively on a positive pressure mechanical ventilator delivering at least 8 ml/kg tidal volumes and in normal sinus rhythm, stroke volume variability \<10% (such patients are acknowledged to be uncommon; the protocol does not recommend or require the induction of passive breathing).
You may not qualify if:
- Lack of informed consent.
- Currently receiving ECMO (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation).
- Known pregnancy or nursing.
- Patient is a prisoner.
- Patient on hospice (or equivalent comfort care approach) at or before the time of enrollment.
- Known or current atrial fibrillation.
- Previously enrolled in the trial.
- Known allergy to esmolol or vehicle
- Receipt of nodal blocking agents within three half lives
- Hemoglobin \< 7 gm/dl.
- Cardiac arrest within 24 hours.
- Pulmonary hypertension (moderate or severe), from documented history of prior right heart catheterization or current evidence on TTE (transthoracic echocardiography) of any of the following
- mPAP (mean pulmonary artery pressure) ≥ 35 mmHg
- SPAP (systolic pulmonary artery pressure)≥ 60 mmHg
- Cardiovascular collapse, as manifested by inability to achieve a MAP (mean arterial pressure) of 65 mmHg with vasopressor therapy.
- +19 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Intermountain Medical Center and Intermountain Clinics
Murray, Utah, 84143, United States
Related Publications (5)
Rudiger A, Singer M. The heart in sepsis: from basic mechanisms to clinical management. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2013 Mar 1;11(2):187-95.
PMID: 23506497BACKGROUNDNovotny NM, Lahm T, Markel TA, Crisostomo PR, Wang M, Wang Y, Ray R, Tan J, Al-Azzawi D, Meldrum DR. beta-Blockers in sepsis: reexamining the evidence. Shock. 2009 Feb;31(2):113-9. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e318180ffb6.
PMID: 18636043BACKGROUNDOberbeck R, Kobbe P. Beta-adrenergic antagonists: indications and potential immunomodulatory side effects in the critically ill. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16(9):1082-90. doi: 10.2174/092986709787581770.
PMID: 19275613BACKGROUNDMorelli A, Ertmer C, Westphal M, Rehberg S, Kampmeier T, Ligges S, Orecchioni A, D'Egidio A, D'Ippoliti F, Raffone C, Venditti M, Guarracino F, Girardis M, Tritapepe L, Pietropaoli P, Mebazaa A, Singer M. Effect of heart rate control with esmolol on hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013 Oct 23;310(16):1683-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278477.
PMID: 24108526BACKGROUNDBrown SM, Beesley SJ, Lanspa MJ, Grissom CK, Wilson EL, Parikh SM, Sarge T, Talmor D, Banner-Goodspeed V, Novack V, Thompson BT, Shahul S; Esmolol to Control Adrenergic Storm in Septic Shock-ROLL-IN (ECASSS-R) study. Esmolol infusion in patients with septic shock and tachycardia: a prospective, single-arm, feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Aug 3;4:132. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0321-5. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30123523DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Office of Research
- Organization
- Intermountain Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Samuel Brown, MD,MS
Intermountain Health Care, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 14, 2016
First Posted
July 22, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
January 9, 2019
Results First Posted
January 9, 2019
Record last verified: 2018-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share