Dural Tenting Sutures in Neurosurgery - is it Necessary?
Prophylactic Use of Dural Tenting Sutures in Elective Craniotomies - is it Necessary? A Multicentre Randomised Study.
1 other identifier
interventional
490
1 country
5
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the necessity of dural tenting sutures in craniotomies. The sutures elevate the dura, a layer between the brain and skull. Supposedly, by doing so, they prevent blood collecting between dura mater and the skull. These blood collections, called epidural hematomas, contributed greatly to postoperative mortality in the early days of neurosurgery. There have been several reports questioning the ongoing need for them in neurosurgery, thanks to modern hemostatic techniques. Moreover, it has been published in the literature, and is a common knowledge as well, that some neurosurgeons do not use these sutures at all, and do not have worse outcomes than their colleagues. In this study, half of the randomly assigned participants will undergo craniotomy without dural tenting sutures and will be considered an intervention group. The other half will undergo craniotomy with these sutures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 31, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 6, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 7, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2022
CompletedJuly 30, 2024
January 1, 2019
3 years
August 31, 2018
July 29, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reoperation due to epidural hematoma
Surgery for the postoperative extradural hematoma
During hospitalization for the surgery, approximately 2 days postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Postoperative 30-day mortality
30-day postoperatively
Postoperative 30-day readmission to a neurosurgical or neurological department
30-day postoperatively
New neurologic deficit or deterioration of a previous one
during hospitalisation, as evaluated 5-7 days postoperatively, or earlier if the patient is discharged before the fifth postsurgical day.
Cerebrospinal fluid leak requiring treatment.
during hospitalisation, as evaluated 5-7 days postoperatively, or earlier if the patient is discharged before the fifth postsurgical day.
Deterioration of postoperative headaches over 5 Numerical Rating Scale
during hospitalisation, as evaluated 5-7 days postoperatively, or earlier if the patient is discharged before the fifth postsurgical day.
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
No dural tenting sutures
EXPERIMENTALNo dural tenting techniques
Dural tenting sutures
ACTIVE COMPARATORDural tenting techniques
Interventions
Not applying dural tenting sutures during closure of a craniotomy
Applying at least 3 dural tenting sutures during closure of a craniotomy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- male or female over 18 and under 75 years old
- qualified for an elective supratentorial craniotomy with a diameter of at least 3 cm
- Glasgow Coma Scale 15 preoperatively
- Modified Rankin Scale 0, 1 or 2 preoperatively
You may not qualify if:
- Coagulation abnormalities before the surgery
- Revision craniotomy
- Skull base surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Department of Neurosurgery, 10th Military Research Hospital and Polyclinic
Bydgoszcz, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship, 85-681, Poland
5 Neurosurgery and Pediatric Neurosurgery Department in Lublin, Medical University of Lublin
Lublin, Lublin Voivodeship, 20-954, Poland
Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Warsaw
Warsaw, Mazovian, 02-097, Poland
Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Silesia, Regional Hospital, Sosnowiec
Sosnowiec, Silesian Voivodeship, 41-200, Poland
Department of Neurosurgery and Oncology of Central Nervous System, Barlicki University Hospital, Medical University of Lodz
Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship, 90-153, Poland
Related Publications (6)
Swayne OB, Horner BM, Dorward NL. The hitch stitch: an obsolete neurosurgical technique? Br J Neurosurg. 2002 Dec;16(6):541-4; discussion 544.
PMID: 12617233BACKGROUNDWinston KR. Efficacy of dural tenting sutures. J Neurosurg. 1999 Aug;91(2):180-4. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.91.2.0180.
PMID: 10433304BACKGROUNDWinston KR. Dural tenting sutures in pediatric neurosurgery. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1998 May;28(5):230-5. doi: 10.1159/000028656.
PMID: 9732254BACKGROUNDWadanamby, S. et al., (2016). Is dural hitching necessary to prevent post-operative extradural haemorrhage in craniotomies and craniectomies. Sri Lanka Journal of Surgery. 34(2), pp.11-17. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4038/sljs.v34i2.8262
BACKGROUNDPrzepiorka L, Wojtowicz K, Kujawski S, Wisniewski K, Bobeff EJ, Kruk R, Kulesza B, Fortuniak J, Mroz A, Dunaj P, Kaspera M, Hoppe S, Krystkiewicz K, Kwiecien K, Szczepanek D, Jaskolski DJ, Ladzinski P, Rola R, Furtak J, Trojanowski T, Marchel A, Kunert P. Dural Tenting in Elective Craniotomies: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Neurosurgery. 2025 Nov 1;97(5):1108-1117. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003480. Epub 2025 May 1.
PMID: 40310111DERIVEDKunert P, Przepiorka L, Fortuniak J, Wisniewski K, Bobeff EJ, Larysz P, Kruk R, Kulesza B, Szczepanek D, Ladzinski P, Zylkowski J, Kujawski S, Labedzka K, Jaskolski D, Rola R, Trojanowski T, Marchel A. Prophylactic use of dural tenting sutures in elective craniotomies in adults-is it necessary? A study protocol for a multicentre, investigator- and participant-blinded randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Trials. 2021 Apr 12;22(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05201-z.
PMID: 33845888DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Łukasz Przepiórka
Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Warsaw
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Przemysław Kunert, MD, PhD
Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Warsaw
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Due to the nature of the surgical procedures, the surgeon and the rest of the OR medical team will be aware of the current subject's allocation. However, in each case, the specific OR team aware of the subject's allocation will be different from the investigators performing further evaluation of the given subject. The following study procedures will be in place to ensure double-blind administration of the study. * Access to the randomization code will be strictly controlled. * The surgeon will receive information on subject's allocation after commencing the surgery. The study blind will be broken: 1. During interim monitoring, after recruiting the first 100 patients. 2. On completion of the clinical study and after the study database has been locked. 3. When patients' safety requires access to allocation data.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2018
First Posted
September 6, 2018
Study Start
September 7, 2018
Primary Completion
September 1, 2021
Study Completion
September 1, 2022
Last Updated
July 30, 2024
Record last verified: 2019-01