NCT03650270

Brief Summary

Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is a potentially devastating condition which can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Studies addressing status epilepticus in children are rare and there is a paucity of large randomised controlled trials in children looking at forms of drug treatment for SE. There is consistency worldwide in guidelines for first line treatment of CSE with benzodiazepines, with slight variations in type and route of administration of agents. Second line therapy usually entails phenobarbital or phenytoin parenterally. Both repeated phenobarbital loading doses and midazolam infusions have been shown to be effective and safe in the management of established convulsive SE, but there are no prospective randomized controlled trials comparing the two in children. Our study has been undertaken to review 2 existing, and routinely used, interventions for children presenting to our center with acute convulsive seizures. In order to permit comparable data to be collected we are randomly allocating these standard interventions prospectively. This is in order to compare the efficacy and safety of two treatment protocols (phenobarbital vs phenytoin and midazolam) both of which as stated are already part of existing standard protocols internationally and in South Africa. Parenteral phenobarbital is a safe, affordable and easy to use drug in the management of status epilepticus especially for poorly resourced communities where undertaking infusions may be unsafe, time consuming or unavailable. We hypothesize that repeated phenobarbital loading is as effective and safe, or more so, than phenytoin followed by midazolam infusion in the management of established and refractory childhood convulsive SE. If proven, then the former would be a viable option for all health care workers with access to intravenous routes (including Day hospitals) where infusions are unsafe, time consuming or unavailable.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
198

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2015

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2015

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2018

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 17, 2018

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 28, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

August 28, 2018

Status Verified

August 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

August 17, 2018

Last Update Submit

August 27, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Differences in anticonvulsant efficacy between different second-line anticonvulsant treatment protocols

    Assessing the time taken to reach seizure arrest after second-line agents given

    Up to 24 hours from the time the patient was admitted.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Differences in how patients tolerate each of the two second-line anticonvulsant treatment protocols

    Up to 24 hours from the time the patient was admitted.

  • Differences in need for pediatric intensive care between the two second-line anticonvulsant protocols

    Up to 24 hours from the time the patient was admitted.

  • Differences in admission time between patients who receive on of the two second-line anticonvulsant protocols

    For the full duration the patient is admitted, which on average is up to one full week (seven days).

Study Arms (2)

Phenobarbital

EXPERIMENTAL

If allocated to this arm 'Phenobarbital' (PHB group), the clinician gives an IV bolus of phenobarbital (20mg/kg ). If CSE did not terminate after 5 - 10 minutes, a second dose is given at half the dosage (10mg/kg) and a third dose (10mg/kg) is given if CSE persists 5-10 minutes after that.

Drug: Phenobarbital

Phenytoin / Midazolam infusion

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In the 'Phenytoin / Midazolam infusion' (PHY/MDZ group), children are given a dose (20mg/kg) of IV phenytoin mixed with 50mL of normal saline solution and administered over 30 minutes . If the child is still in CSE 5-10 minutes after the phenytoin is given, they then start on a midazolam infusion. This includes a loading dose of IV midazolam (0.2mg/kg) followed by an infusion set at 3mg/kg into 50mL 5% dextrose water given at a rate of 1-4 mL/hour (equivalent to 1-4 mcg/kg/min ).

Drug: Phenobarbital

Interventions

Three repeated doses of pareneteral phenobarbital was compared to a single parenteral infusion of phenytoin followed by an infusion of parenteral midazolam

Also known as: Phenytoin, Midazolam
PhenobarbitalPhenytoin / Midazolam infusion

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Month - 15 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Children in convulsive status epilepticus (as defined by Trinka et al 2015)

You may not qualify if:

  • Children not in convulsive status epilepticus

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital

Cape Town, Western Cape, 7700, South Africa

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Burman RJ, Ackermann S, Shapson-Coe A, Ndondo A, Buys H, Wilmshurst JM. A Comparison of Parenteral Phenobarbital vs. Parenteral Phenytoin as Second-Line Management for Pediatric Convulsive Status Epilepticus in a Resource-Limited Setting. Front Neurol. 2019 May 15;10:506. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00506. eCollection 2019.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

PhenobarbitalPhenytoinMidazolam

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BarbituratesPyrimidinonesPyrimidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsHydantoinsImidazolidinesImidazolesAzolesBenzodiazepinesBenzazepinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The specific treatment protocol was blinded to the data analyser
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: random allocation to 2 study protocols
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of Department of Paediatric Neurology, Red Cross War Memorial Childrens Hospital

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2018

First Posted

August 28, 2018

Study Start

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion

March 1, 2018

Study Completion

March 1, 2018

Last Updated

August 28, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-08

Locations