Evaluation of the Accuracy of Measurements Made on Images Taken From the Mouth for Dental Arches
Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of Measurements Made on Intra-oral Images of the Dental Arches Compared to Those Made on Poured Plaster Models in the Assessment of Tooth-size-arch-length-discrepancy, Bolton's Analysis and Little's Index of Irregularity.
1 other identifier
observational
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The general trend in the orthodontic practice is to become digital in many aspects. Since 1980s, digital photographs have been available and they play a principal role in the orthodontic practice for documentation and diagnosis purposes. Now photographs have an important role in teaching, scientific research and medical examination. Successful orthodontic treatment is based on a comprehensive diagnosis and treatment planning. A few of the fundamental factors in the diagnosis are the spacing condition, tooth size, arch form and dimensions, as well as the tooth-arch discrepancies. Intraoral photographs' major role is to enable orthodontists to document and analyze the occlusal relationships as well as the dental and soft-tissue features in order to arrive at a good diagnosis and an appropriate treatment plan. In 1975, Robert Little developed Little's irregularity index (LII). The index was proposed to assess teeth irregularity, crowding, relapse, and alignment of anterior teeth as it measured the linear displacements in the horizontal plane between contact points of anterior teeth, ignoring vertical displacement, from mesial surface of one canine to the contra-lateral one. The sum of the 5 liner measurements of displacements was the LII score. The higher the index value, the more severe irregularity of the teeth was. LII has been originally developed for mandibular incisors to study relapse; however, researchers have used it to assess upper and lower incisors irregularity Tooth-size-arch-length discrepancy (TSALD) is widely used on study models to assess the level of harmony between tooth size and the supporting basal bone. Bolton analysis is another important measurement used to identify disharmony between maxillary and mandibular tooth size which is considered an important factor to ensure the success of orthodontic treatment. With the application of the suggested formulas, the overall ratio should be 91.3% (±1.91) and the partial (anterior) ratio should be 77.2% (±1.65). The validity and reliability of performing the above mentioned analyses on images taken of the dental arches have not been evaluated yet in the literature. This is the aim of the current project.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jun 2018
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 19, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 24, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 27, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2018
CompletedJuly 18, 2019
July 1, 2019
2 months
August 24, 2018
July 16, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Little's Index of Irregularity (LII)
Robert Little developed Little's irregularity index (LII) in 1975. The index has been proposed to assess teeth irregularity, crowding, relapse, and alignment of anterior teeth as it measured the linear displacements in the horizontal plane between contact points of anterior teeth, ignoring vertical displacement, from mesial surface of one canine to the contra-lateral one. The sum of the 5 liner measurements of displacements is considered the LII score. The higher the index value, the more severe irregularity of the teeth is. LII has been originally developed for mandibular incisors to study relapse; however, researchers have used it to assess upper and lower incisors irregularity.
After seven days of taking the impressions of the dental arches. Impressions will be taken in the same day of patient's entry to the cohort.
Partial Bolton's Ratio
Bolton analysis is used to identify disharmony between maxillary and mandibular tooth size which is considered an important factor to ensure the success of orthodontic treatment. With the application of the suggested formula, the partial ratio should be 77.2% (±1.65) The formula is the sum of the mesio-distal widths of the lower six anterior teeth divided by the sum of the mesio-distal widths of the upper six anterior teeth.
After seven days of taking the impressions of the dental arches. Impressions will be taken in the same day of patient's entry to the cohort.
Overall Bolton's Ratio
Bolton analysis is used to identify disharmony between maxillary and mandibular tooth size which is considered an important factor to ensure the success of orthodontic treatment. With the application of the suggested formula, the overall ratio should be 91.3%. The formula is the sum of the mesio-distal widths of the lower twelve teeth divided by the sum of the mesio-distal widths of the upper twelve teeth.
After seven days of taking the impressions of the dental arches. Impressions will be taken in the same day of patient's entry to the cohort.
Tooth-size-arch-length-discrepancy (TSALD)
Tooth-size-arch-length discrepancy (TSALD) is widely used on study models to assess the level of harmony between tooth size and the supporting basal bone. The formula is The sum of mesio-distal widths of all permanent teeth (mesial to the first lower/upper molars) minus the sum of the basal bone length (measured by a specific thread). The result is expressed in mm.
After seven days of taking the impressions of the dental arches. Impressions will be taken in the same day of patient's entry to the cohort.
Study Arms (1)
Malocclusion patients
Patients with different types of malocclusion will be included. Plaster models will be fabricated after pouring the impressions with hard gypsum. Then, digital images of the dental arches of each patient will be taken using a dedicated camera with very high resolution. Finally, digital images of models that were poured with gypsum will be taken also with the same camera and in the same conditions.
Interventions
The impressions taken of the dental arches will be poured with hard gypsum in order to make use of the models for taking measurements. These measurements will be considered the gold standard.
The dental arches will be captured using a dedicated camera in order to be used for measuring the outcomes.
The poured dental models will be captured using a dedicated camera in order to be used for measuring the outcomes.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with different levels of malocclusion
You may qualify if:
- Complete permanent dentition
- Absence of any big carious lesions
- Absence of fixed prosthodontics (fixed bridges)
- Absence of shape and size disturbances (regardless third molar)
- Presence of upper and lower crowded arches
You may not qualify if:
- Missing teeth
- Migrated teeth
- Impacted teeth
- Severely broken down teeth or big carious lesions
- Presence of fixed prosthodontics (fixed bridges)
- Presence of shape and size disturbances
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School
Damascus, DM20AM18, Syria
Related Publications (7)
Almasoud N, Bearn D. Little's irregularity index: photographic assessment vs study model assessment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Dec;138(6):787-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.01.031.
PMID: 21130338BACKGROUNDJones ML. The Barry Project--a three-dimensional assessment of occlusal treatment change in a consecutively referred sample: the incisors. Br J Orthod. 1990 Feb;17(1):1-19. doi: 10.1179/bjo.17.1.1.
PMID: 2310735BACKGROUNDLittle RM. The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod. 1975 Nov;68(5):554-63. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(75)90086-x.
PMID: 1059332BACKGROUNDPuneky PJ, Sadowsky C, BeGole EA. Tooth morphology and lower incisor alignment many years after orthodontic therapy. Am J Orthod. 1984 Oct;86(4):299-305. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(84)90140-4.
PMID: 6592978BACKGROUNDSurbeck BT, Artun J, Hawkins NR, Leroux B. Associations between initial, posttreatment, and postretention alignment of maxillary anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Feb;113(2):186-95. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70291-4.
PMID: 9484210BACKGROUNDTran AM, Rugh JD, Chacon JA, Hatch JP. Reliability and validity of a computer-based Little irregularity index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Mar;123(3):349-51. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.76. No abstract available.
PMID: 12637908BACKGROUNDWest AE, Jones ML, Newcombe RG. Multiflex versus superelastic: a randomized clinical trial of the tooth alignment ability of initial arch wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Nov;108(5):464-71. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70046-3.
PMID: 7484965BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wael Al-Rasheed Omer, DDS
MSc student at the Orthodontic Department, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amer M Owayda, DDS
MSc student in Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, SYRIA
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mohammad Y Hajeer, DDS MSc PhD
Associate Professor of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, SYRIA
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Rashad Murad, DDS MSc PhD
Associate Professor of Toxicology, University of Damascus Pharmacological College, Damascus, Syria
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2018
First Posted
August 27, 2018
Study Start
June 15, 2018
Primary Completion
August 19, 2018
Study Completion
September 15, 2018
Last Updated
July 18, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share