Duration Of Lower Labial Segment Alignment With Repeated Micro-Osteoperforations:
MOP
1 other identifier
interventional
19
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main purpose is to compare overall alignment time (OAT) in days in alleviating mandibular incisors crowding between control group and MOPs group.Furthermore, to investigate the presence of volumetric root resorption from CBCT, gingival recession and formation of black triangle post lower labial segment alignment between micro-osteoperforations group and control group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 19, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 13, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 25, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 14, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 14, 2021
CompletedOctober 27, 2021
October 1, 2021
2.4 years
March 13, 2019
October 26, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
1. To compare the duration to align the lower labial segment (33-43), between regular and irregular review groups from the conventional (control group).
Total treatment time needed to achieved lower labial segment alignment until Little's irregularity index scores one, indicating a minimum irregularity of ≤ 2 mm contact point displacement, based on the contact point displacements of the mandibular anterior segment, from canine to canine
5 months
2. To compare the duration to align the lower labial segment (33-43), between regular and irregular review groups from the micro-osteoperforations group.
Total treatment time needed to achieved lower labial segment alignment until Little's irregularity index scores one, indicating a minimum irregularity of ≤ 2 mm contact point displacement, based on the contact point displacements of the mandibular anterior segment, from canine to canine
5 months
3. To compare the duration to align the lower labial segment (33-43), between micro-osteoperforations and control group in the regular review group.
Total treatment time needed to achieved lower labial segment alignment until Little's irregularity index scores one, indicating a minimum irregularity of ≤ 2 mm contact point displacement, based on the contact point displacements of the mandibular anterior segment, from canine to canine
5 months
4. To compare the duration to align the lower labial segment (33-43), between micro-osteoperforations and control group in the irregular review group.
Total treatment time needed to achieved lower labial segment alignment until Little's irregularity index scores one, indicating a minimum irregularity of ≤ 2 mm contact point displacement, based on the contact point displacements of the mandibular anterior segment, from canine to canine
5 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Total volume of root resorption with micro-osteoperforations group vs the control group
5 months
Gingival recession between micro-osteoperforations and control group.
5 months
Black triangle between micro-osteoperforations and control group.
5 months
Study Arms (2)
Micro-osteoperforations
EXPERIMENTALLower arch, 2 MOPs vertically at interdental area bilaterally mesial to lower 6's ; mesial to lower 1st premolar; mesial to lower 2's and between the lower 1's..The start date of lower labial segment alignment (T1) was recorded after insertion of the lower 0.014'' NiTi archwire. Participants were reviewed every 6 weeks and repeated MOPs were performed for the experimental group until the completion of lower labial segment alignment (LLS), which is when the Little's irregularity index scores one, indicating a minimum irregularity of ≤ 2 mm contact point displacement, based on the contact point displacements of the mandibular anterior segment, from canine to canine.
control
NO INTERVENTIONConventional orthodontic treatment without any aid in tooth acceleration method / device
Interventions
MOPs will be performed using SIA Excalibur Mini-Implant with dimension 1.6 mm in width and length of 6 mm, screw 3 mm depth into buccal bone of intervention sites
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Gender : Male and Female
- Age range : ≥ 18years to 45 years old
- Crowding of 3mm - 7mm on lower labial segment (lower right canine to lower left canine) which does not require extractions in the lower arch
- Class II div I Incisor relationship with extraction of both upper 1st premolars
- Maximum anchorage control with temporary anchorage device ( TAD) , with Molar Class II (¼ to full unit) malocclusion
- Average vertical facial proportions
- No systemic disease
- Acceptable good oral hygiene
- No periodontal disease
You may not qualify if:
- Smokers
- Distally angulated canines
- History of trauma (crown fracture or avulsion and re-implantation) , endodontic treatment
- Missing permanent mandibular anterior teeth ( Hypodontia) / Retained deciduous teeth in mandibular anterior area
- Habits eg: fingernails biting , toothpick user , using hard toothbrush
- Vertical skeletal discrepancies eg high angle and low angle
- Systemic disease especially on long term use of antibiotics, phenytoin, cyclosporin, anti-inflammatory drugs, systemic corticosteroid and calcium channel blockers
- Poor oral hygiene for more than 3 visits
- Current periodontal disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry , University of Malaya
Kajang, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia
Related Publications (5)
Teixeira CC, Khoo E, Tran J, Chartres I, Liu Y, Thant LM, Khabensky I, Gart LP, Cisneros G, Alikhani M. Cytokine expression and accelerated tooth movement. J Dent Res. 2010 Oct;89(10):1135-41. doi: 10.1177/0022034510373764. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
PMID: 20639508BACKGROUNDAlikhani M, Raptis M, Zoldan B, Sangsuwon C, Lee YB, Alyami B, Corpodian C, Barrera LM, Alansari S, Khoo E, Teixeira C. Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Nov;144(5):639-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.06.017.
PMID: 24182579BACKGROUNDAlkebsi A, Al-Maaitah E, Al-Shorman H, Abu Alhaija E. Three-dimensional assessment of the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction in adults with Class II malocclusion: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Jun;153(6):771-785. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.026.
PMID: 29853235BACKGROUNDSivarajan S, Doss JG, Papageorgiou SN, Cobourne MT, Wey MC. Mini-implant supported canine retraction with micro-osteoperforation: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2019 Mar;89(2):183-189. doi: 10.2319/011518-47.1. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
PMID: 30372126BACKGROUNDAttri S, Mittal R, Batra P, Sonar S, Sharma K, Raghavan S, Rai KS. Comparison of rate of tooth movement and pain perception during accelerated tooth movement associated with conventional fixed appliances with micro-osteoperforations - a randomised controlled trial. J Orthod. 2018 Dec;45(4):225-233. doi: 10.1080/14653125.2018.1528746. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
PMID: 30281397BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nik Nuraini Nik Azmin
University of Malaya
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
lorretha p ringgingon
faculty of dentistry university of malaya
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Saritha Sivarajan
faculty of dentistry university of malaya
- STUDY DIRECTOR
wey mang chek
faculty of dentistry university of malaya
- STUDY DIRECTOR
mona fayed
faculty of dentistry university of malaya
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Blinding of either patient or clinician is not possible during allocation, treatment and data collection. However, blinding can be ensured during data processing, analysing stages and data collection for secondary outcomes on total volume of root resorption from CBCT, formation of black triangle and gingiva recession
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 13, 2019
First Posted
March 25, 2019
Study Start
November 19, 2018
Primary Completion
April 14, 2021
Study Completion
April 14, 2021
Last Updated
October 27, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share