NCT03645850

Brief Summary

This study is a multicentric, comparative, randomized, investigator-blinded, parallel group study to demonstrate the non-inferiority of Vismed® Gel Multi 0.3% in comparison with Vismed® Multi 0.18% in terms of cornea and conjunctiva staining (Oxford score) on patients with moderate to severe ocular dryness, after 35 days of treatment.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 22, 2018

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 24, 2018

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2018

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 15, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

August 24, 2018

Status Verified

August 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

August 22, 2018

Last Update Submit

August 22, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (16)

  • Demonstrate the non-inferiority of Vismed® Gel Multi 0.3% in comparison with Vismed® Multi 0.18% in terms of cornea and conjunctiva staining (Oxford score) on patients with moderate to severe ocular dryness, after 35 days of treatment.

    Assess the ocular surface fluorescein staining score- mean change from Baseline in the study at D35 in ocular surface fluorescein stainig score according to a scale from zero to 15

    35 days

  • To assess the total ocular surface fluorescein staining score at D84

    Mean change from Baseline (D0) in the study eye and D84 in the total ocular surface fluoresceine staining score

    0 and 84 days

  • Evolution of DEQ-5 score

    Evolution from Baseline of DEQ-5 questionnaire scores at day 35

    35 days

  • Evolution of DEQ-5 score

    Evolution from Baseline of DEQ-5 questionnaire scores at day 84

    84 days

  • Evolution of Van Bijterveld score ( lissamine green staining)

    Mean change from Baseline ( D0) and D 35 in the total Van Bijterveld score

    35 Days

  • Evolution of Van Bijterveld score ( lissamine green staining)

    Mean change from Baseline ( D0) and D 84 in the total Van Bijterveld score

    84 days

  • Volume tear fluid secretion as assessed by schirmer test

    Mean change from Baseline ( D0) in Volume tear fluid secretion as assessed

    35 days

  • Volume tear fluid secretion as assessed by schirmer test

    Mean change from Baseline ( D0) in Volume tear fluid secretion as assessed

    84 days

  • Evolution of Tear film Break-Up Time

    Mean change from Baseline (D0) in the study eye in TFBUT at Day 35

    35 days

  • Evolution of Tear film Break-Up Time

    Mean change from Baseline (D0) in the study eye in TFBUT at Day 84

    84 days

  • Global sum score of dry eye symptoms at visit 3 - mean change from Baseline at visit 3 ( D35)

    Mean change from Baseline in the global sum score of dry eye symptoms at D35 : discomfort,burning, stinging,eye dryness sensation, itching,foreign body sensation,photophobia, blurred vision.Each graded from 0 to 10

    35 days

  • Global sum score of dry eye symptoms at visit 4 - mean change from Baseline at visit 3 ( D84)

    Mean change from Baseline in the global sum score of dry eye symptoms at D84 : discomfort,burning, stinging,eye dryness sensation, itching,foreign body sensation,photophobia, blurred vision.Each graded from 0 to 10

    84 days

  • Global treatment performance score assessed by the investigator at visit 3

    Total Treatment performance score graded from 0 to 4

    35 days

  • Global treatment performance score assessed by the investigator at visit 4

    Total Treatment performance score graded from 0 to 4

    84 days

  • Global treatment performance score assessed by the patient at visit 3

    Total Treatment performance score graded from 0 to 4

    35 days

  • Global treatment performance score assessed by the patient at visit 4

    Total Treatment performance score graded from 0 to 4

    84 days

Study Arms (2)

Investig. device:Vismed Gel Multi 0.3%

EXPERIMENTAL

Vismed gel Multi 0.3% eye drops: 1 to 2 drops in each eye between 4 and 6 times per day during 84 days

Device: Vismed gel Multi 0.3% eye drops

Comparative device: Vismed Multi 0.18%

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Vismed Multi 0.18% eye drops: 1 to 2 drops in each eye between 4 and 6 times per day during 84 days

Device: Vismed Multi 0.18% eye drops

Interventions

Ophthalmic use. Vismed gel Multi 0.3% eye drops. One to two drops instilled in each eye from 4 to 6 times per day during 84 days of treatment.

Investig. device:Vismed Gel Multi 0.3%

Ophthalmic use. One to two drops instilled in each eye from 4 to 6 times per day during 84 days of treatment.

Comparative device: Vismed Multi 0.18%

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Sex: male or female.
  • Age: more than 18 years.
  • Subject with a score ≥ 6 for the 5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5)
  • Subject with at least one eye with:
  • Global ocular staining (cornea and conjunctiva) ≥4 and ≤9 on the Oxford scale (0 to 15)
  • AND one of the following criteria:
  • Schirmer test ≥ 3 mm/5 min and ≤ 9 mm/5 min OR
  • Sum of 3 measurements of Tear film Break-Up Time (TBUT) ≤ 30s.
  • Subject, having given freely and expressly his/her informed consent.
  • Subject who is able to comply with the study requirements, as defined in the present CIP, at the Investigator's appreciation.
  • In France: subject being affiliated to a health social security system. Female subjects of childbearing potential should use a medically accepted contraceptive regimen since at least 12 weeks before the beginning of the study, during all the study and at least 1 month after the study end.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant or nursing woman or planning a pregnancy during the study.
  • Subject deprived of freedom by administrative or legal decision.
  • Subject in a social or health institution
  • Subject who is under guardianship or who is not able to express his/her consent.
  • Subject suspected to be non-compliant according to the Investigator's judgment.
  • Subject wearing contact lenses during the study.
  • Far best corrected visual acuity \< 1/10
  • Subject with severe ocular dryness with one of these conditions:
  • Eyelid or blinking malfunction
  • Corneal disorders not related to dry eye syndrome
  • Ocular metaplasia
  • Filamentous keratitis
  • Corneal neovascularization
  • Subject with severe meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)
  • History of ocular allergy or ocular herpes within the last 12 months.
  • +4 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndromes

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lacrimal Apparatus DiseasesEye Diseases

Study Officials

  • Béatrice Cochener-Lamard, Prof

    Hôpital Morvan, Brest, France

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Parallel Assignment Because the comparator will be in commercial packaging, the blinding of the subject is not possible. However, the study will be blinded for the investigator: evaluations will be done by an independent investigator, different than the person who will distribute the product. Subjects will be identified by a patient number. Each patient number will be associated to a treatment number, according to a randomization list provided before the beginning of the clinical investigation, and randomized either in one of both treatment groups (Vismed Gel Multi 3% or Vismed Multi 0.18%).
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2018

First Posted

August 24, 2018

Study Start

September 1, 2018

Primary Completion

March 1, 2019

Study Completion

June 15, 2019

Last Updated

August 24, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-08