Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Vismed Gel Multi 0.3% Versus Vismed Multi 0.18% on Treatment of Ocular Dryness
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Vismed® Gel Multi 0.3% Versus Vismed® Multi 0.18% on the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Ocular Dryness
2 other identifiers
interventional
80
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study is a multicentric, comparative, randomized, investigator-blinded, parallel group study to demonstrate the non-inferiority of Vismed® Gel Multi 0.3% in comparison with Vismed® Multi 0.18% in terms of cornea and conjunctiva staining (Oxford score) on patients with moderate to severe ocular dryness, after 35 days of treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 22, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 24, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 15, 2019
CompletedAugust 24, 2018
August 1, 2018
6 months
August 22, 2018
August 22, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (16)
Demonstrate the non-inferiority of Vismed® Gel Multi 0.3% in comparison with Vismed® Multi 0.18% in terms of cornea and conjunctiva staining (Oxford score) on patients with moderate to severe ocular dryness, after 35 days of treatment.
Assess the ocular surface fluorescein staining score- mean change from Baseline in the study at D35 in ocular surface fluorescein stainig score according to a scale from zero to 15
35 days
To assess the total ocular surface fluorescein staining score at D84
Mean change from Baseline (D0) in the study eye and D84 in the total ocular surface fluoresceine staining score
0 and 84 days
Evolution of DEQ-5 score
Evolution from Baseline of DEQ-5 questionnaire scores at day 35
35 days
Evolution of DEQ-5 score
Evolution from Baseline of DEQ-5 questionnaire scores at day 84
84 days
Evolution of Van Bijterveld score ( lissamine green staining)
Mean change from Baseline ( D0) and D 35 in the total Van Bijterveld score
35 Days
Evolution of Van Bijterveld score ( lissamine green staining)
Mean change from Baseline ( D0) and D 84 in the total Van Bijterveld score
84 days
Volume tear fluid secretion as assessed by schirmer test
Mean change from Baseline ( D0) in Volume tear fluid secretion as assessed
35 days
Volume tear fluid secretion as assessed by schirmer test
Mean change from Baseline ( D0) in Volume tear fluid secretion as assessed
84 days
Evolution of Tear film Break-Up Time
Mean change from Baseline (D0) in the study eye in TFBUT at Day 35
35 days
Evolution of Tear film Break-Up Time
Mean change from Baseline (D0) in the study eye in TFBUT at Day 84
84 days
Global sum score of dry eye symptoms at visit 3 - mean change from Baseline at visit 3 ( D35)
Mean change from Baseline in the global sum score of dry eye symptoms at D35 : discomfort,burning, stinging,eye dryness sensation, itching,foreign body sensation,photophobia, blurred vision.Each graded from 0 to 10
35 days
Global sum score of dry eye symptoms at visit 4 - mean change from Baseline at visit 3 ( D84)
Mean change from Baseline in the global sum score of dry eye symptoms at D84 : discomfort,burning, stinging,eye dryness sensation, itching,foreign body sensation,photophobia, blurred vision.Each graded from 0 to 10
84 days
Global treatment performance score assessed by the investigator at visit 3
Total Treatment performance score graded from 0 to 4
35 days
Global treatment performance score assessed by the investigator at visit 4
Total Treatment performance score graded from 0 to 4
84 days
Global treatment performance score assessed by the patient at visit 3
Total Treatment performance score graded from 0 to 4
35 days
Global treatment performance score assessed by the patient at visit 4
Total Treatment performance score graded from 0 to 4
84 days
Study Arms (2)
Investig. device:Vismed Gel Multi 0.3%
EXPERIMENTALVismed gel Multi 0.3% eye drops: 1 to 2 drops in each eye between 4 and 6 times per day during 84 days
Comparative device: Vismed Multi 0.18%
ACTIVE COMPARATORVismed Multi 0.18% eye drops: 1 to 2 drops in each eye between 4 and 6 times per day during 84 days
Interventions
Ophthalmic use. Vismed gel Multi 0.3% eye drops. One to two drops instilled in each eye from 4 to 6 times per day during 84 days of treatment.
Ophthalmic use. One to two drops instilled in each eye from 4 to 6 times per day during 84 days of treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Sex: male or female.
- Age: more than 18 years.
- Subject with a score ≥ 6 for the 5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5)
- Subject with at least one eye with:
- Global ocular staining (cornea and conjunctiva) ≥4 and ≤9 on the Oxford scale (0 to 15)
- AND one of the following criteria:
- Schirmer test ≥ 3 mm/5 min and ≤ 9 mm/5 min OR
- Sum of 3 measurements of Tear film Break-Up Time (TBUT) ≤ 30s.
- Subject, having given freely and expressly his/her informed consent.
- Subject who is able to comply with the study requirements, as defined in the present CIP, at the Investigator's appreciation.
- In France: subject being affiliated to a health social security system. Female subjects of childbearing potential should use a medically accepted contraceptive regimen since at least 12 weeks before the beginning of the study, during all the study and at least 1 month after the study end.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or nursing woman or planning a pregnancy during the study.
- Subject deprived of freedom by administrative or legal decision.
- Subject in a social or health institution
- Subject who is under guardianship or who is not able to express his/her consent.
- Subject suspected to be non-compliant according to the Investigator's judgment.
- Subject wearing contact lenses during the study.
- Far best corrected visual acuity \< 1/10
- Subject with severe ocular dryness with one of these conditions:
- Eyelid or blinking malfunction
- Corneal disorders not related to dry eye syndrome
- Ocular metaplasia
- Filamentous keratitis
- Corneal neovascularization
- Subject with severe meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)
- History of ocular allergy or ocular herpes within the last 12 months.
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Horus Pharmalead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Béatrice Cochener-Lamard, Prof
Hôpital Morvan, Brest, France
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2018
First Posted
August 24, 2018
Study Start
September 1, 2018
Primary Completion
March 1, 2019
Study Completion
June 15, 2019
Last Updated
August 24, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08