Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of DM934 Versus Théalose on Eye Dryness
Multicentric, Randomized, Comparative Clinical Study on the Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of DM934 Versus Théalose on the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Ocular Dryness
1 other identifier
interventional
85
4 countries
5
Brief Summary
This study is a multicentric, comparative, randomized, investigator-blinded, parallel group study to demonstrate the non-inferiority of DM934 in comparison with Théalose in terms of cornea and conjunctiva staining (Oxford score) on patients with moderate to severe ocular dryness, after 35 days of treatment
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 7, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 12, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2024
CompletedFebruary 13, 2025
July 1, 2024
5 months
January 30, 2024
February 11, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cornea and conjunctiva staining (Oxford score)
Evaluation of the non-inferiority of DM934 in comparison with Théalose, in terms of cornea and conjunctiva staining (Oxford score), on worse eye
35 days
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Cornea and conjunctiva staining (Oxford score) (performance)
35 days
Cornea and conjunctiva staining (Oxford score) (performance)
84 days
Tear-Film Break Up Time (TBUT) (performance)
35 days
Tear-Film Break Up Time (TBUT) (performance)
84 days
OSDI (questionnaire)(performance)
35 days
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Lacrimal meniscus height (exploratory, optional)
35 days
Lacrimal meniscus height (exploratory, optional)
84 days
Study Arms (2)
Investigational product
EXPERIMENTALComparator
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject with a score ≥ 18 for the OSDI (Ocular Surface Disease Index).
- Subject with at least one eye with:
- Global ocular staining (cornea and conjunctiva) ≥4 and ≤9 on the Oxford scale (0 to 15)
- AND one of the following criteria:
- Schirmer test ≥ 3 mm/5 min and ≤ 9 mm/5 min OR
- Sum of 3 measurements of Tear film Break-Up Time (TBUT) ≤ 30s.
- Subject, having given freely and expressly his/her informed consent.
- Subject who is able to comply with the study requirements, as defined in the present CIP, at the Investigator's appreciation.
- For applicable countries: subject being affiliated to a health social security system.
- Female subjects of childbearing potential should use a medically accepted contraceptive regimen since at least 12 weeks before the beginning of the study, during all the study and at least 1 month after the study end.
You may not qualify if:
- Far best corrected visual acuity \< 1/10 (according to Snellen Chart)
- Subject with severe ocular dryness with one of these conditions:
- Eyelid or blinking malfunction
- Corneal disorders not related to dry eye syndrome
- Ocular metaplasia
- Filamentous keratitis
- Corneal neovascularization
- Subject with severe meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).
- History of ocular allergy or ocular herpes within the last 12 months.
- Any troubles of the ocular surface not related to dry eye syndrome .
- Subjects who underwent ocular surgery, including laser surgery, in either eye within the last 6 months.
- Subjects who have received ocular therapy (either eye) with any ophthalmic medication, except tear substitutes, within 2 weeks prior to study start or expected to receive ocular therapy during the study.
- Any not stabilised systemic treatment, which can have an effect on performance or safety criteria, at the investigator appreciation.
- Pregnant or nursing woman or planning a pregnancy during the study.
- Subject deprived of freedom by administrative or legal decision.
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Horus Pharmalead
- Eurofins Dermscan Pharmascancollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Eurofins Dermscan
Aix-en-Provence, France
Eurofins EVIC
Bordeaux, France
Eurofins Dermscan Poland
Gdansk, Poland
IOBA
Valladolid, Spain
Ocular Technology Group
London, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ewa Paw, MD
Eurofins Dermscan Poland
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2024
First Posted
February 7, 2024
Study Start
March 7, 2024
Primary Completion
August 12, 2024
Study Completion
September 30, 2024
Last Updated
February 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-07