Variation in Urine Electrolytes, pH and Specific Gravity Throughout the Day
1 other identifier
interventional
23
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is a prospective study looking at healthy adults who will have urine collected at 4 set times throughout the course of the day. On Day 2, 3, and 4 subjects will drink a bottle of water containing True lemon and on days 2 and 3 double the amount of fluid intake from Day 1. On day 4 the subject will collect urine samples at 4 set times throughout the day. The pH of all of the urine samples will be checked with a urine dipstick and the samples will be sent to Litholink Lab for electrolyte composition analysis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable healthy
Started Aug 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 24, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 28, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 20, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 20, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 21, 2021
CompletedFebruary 21, 2021
February 1, 2021
9 months
May 30, 2018
November 20, 2020
February 2, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Citrate/Creatinine Ratio
Citrate/Cr at 4 voids throughout the day. Pre = baseline fluid intake; Post = increased fluid and citrate supplementation
Day 1 (first void, 9-10 am, 1-2 pm and 5 pm) and Day 4 (first void, 9-10 am, 1-2 pm and 5 pm)
Calcium / Creatinine
Ca/Cr at 4 voids throughout the day. Pre = baseline fluid intake; Post = increased fluid and citrate supplementation
Day 1 (first void, 9-10 am, 1-2 pm and 5 pm) and Day 4 (first void, 9-10 am, 1-2 pm and 5 pm)
pH
pH at 4 voids throughout the day. Pre = baseline fluid intake; Post
Day 1 (first void, 9-10 am, 1-2 pm and 5 pm) and Day 4 (first void, 9-10 am, 1-2 pm and 5 pm)
Specific Gravity (SG)
SG at 4 voids throughout the day. Pre = baseline fluid intake; Post
Day 1 (first void, 9-10 am, 1-2 pm and 5 pm) and Day 4 (first void, 9-10 am, 1-2 pm and 5 pm)
Total Fluid Intake
Over 4 day study period
Study Arms (2)
Normal Diet/Drinking
ACTIVE COMPARATORBaseline diet and drinking patterns for patients. This is the pre-intervention baseline for cross-over analysis
Increased fluid Intake and Citrate Supplementation
EXPERIMENTALPatients will increase fluid (with goal to double their baseline) and further take a citrate supplement in the form of True Lemon (citric acid).
Interventions
16.9oz water with True Lemon
No intervention
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy adult subjects
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects taking diuretics
- Subjects who have known kidney disease
- Subjects with history of known nephrolithiasis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Adam Howe, MDlead
- Labcorp Corporation of America Holdings, Inccollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Albany Medical College
Albany, New York, 12208, United States
Related Publications (21)
Cheungpasitporn W, Rossetti S, Friend K, Erickson SB, Lieske JC. Treatment effect, adherence, and safety of high fluid intake for the prevention of incident and recurrent kidney stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nephrol. 2016 Apr;29(2):211-219. doi: 10.1007/s40620-015-0210-4. Epub 2015 May 29.
PMID: 26022722BACKGROUNDLotan Y, Antonelli J, Jimenez IB, Gharbi H, Herring R, Beaver A, Dennis A, Von Merveldt D, Carter S, Cohen A, Poindexter J, Moe OW, Pearle MS. The kidney stone and increased water intake trial in steel workers: results from a pilot study. Urolithiasis. 2017 Apr;45(2):177-183. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0892-7. Epub 2016 May 26.
PMID: 27228999BACKGROUNDScales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS; Urologic Diseases in America Project. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2012 Jul;62(1):160-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052. Epub 2012 Mar 31.
PMID: 22498635BACKGROUNDPearle MS, Goldfarb DS, Assimos DG, Curhan G, Denu-Ciocca CJ, Matlaga BR, Monga M, Penniston KL, Preminger GM, Turk TM, White JR; American Urological Assocation. Medical management of kidney stones: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2014 Aug;192(2):316-24. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 May 20.
PMID: 24857648BACKGROUNDHong YH, Dublin N, Razack AH, Mohd MA, Husain R. Twenty-four hour and spot urine metabolic evaluations: correlations versus agreements. Urology. 2010 Jun;75(6):1294-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.061. Epub 2009 Nov 14.
PMID: 19914693BACKGROUNDOmar M, Sarkissian C, Jianbo L, Calle J, Monga M. Dipstick Spot urine pH does not accurately represent 24 hour urine PH measured by an electrode. Int Braz J Urol. 2016 May-Jun;42(3):546-9. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0071.
PMID: 27286119BACKGROUNDStrohmaier WL, Hoelz KJ, Bichler KH. Spot urine samples for the metabolic evaluation of urolithiasis patients. Eur Urol. 1997;32(3):294-300.
PMID: 9358216BACKGROUNDFenton TR, Eliasziw M, Lyon AW, Tough SC, Brown JP, Hanley DA. Low 5-year stability of within-patient ion excretion and urine pH in fasting-morning-urine specimens. Nutr Res. 2009 May;29(5):320-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2009.04.005.
PMID: 19555813BACKGROUNDMatsushita K, Tanikawa K. Significance of the calcium to creatinine concentration ratio of a single-voided urine specimen in patients with hypercalciuric urolithiasis. Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 1987 Sep;12(3):167-71.
PMID: 3454077BACKGROUNDUtsch B, Klaus G. Urinalysis in children and adolescents. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014 Sep 12;111(37):617-25; quiz 626. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0617.
PMID: 25283761BACKGROUNDSimerville JA, Maxted WC, Pahira JJ. Urinalysis: a comprehensive review. Am Fam Physician. 2005 Mar 15;71(6):1153-62.
PMID: 15791892BACKGROUNDHardy PE. Urinalysis interpretation. Neonatal Netw. 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):45-9. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.29.1.45. No abstract available.
PMID: 20085877BACKGROUNDYi JH, Shin HJ, Kim SM, Han SW, Kim HJ, Oh MS. Does the exposure of urine samples to air affect diagnostic tests for urine acidification? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Aug;7(8):1211-6. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03230312. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
PMID: 22700881BACKGROUNDTaylor EN, Curhan GC. Body size and 24-hour urine composition. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 Dec;48(6):905-15. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.09.004.
PMID: 17162145BACKGROUNDCurhan GC, Willett WC, Speizer FE, Stampfer MJ. Twenty-four-hour urine chemistries and the risk of kidney stones among women and men. Kidney Int. 2001 Jun;59(6):2290-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00746.x.
PMID: 11380833BACKGROUNDAhmed AI, Baz H, Lotfy S. Urinalysis: The Automated Versus Manual Techniques; Is It Time To Change? Clin Lab. 2016;62(1-2):49-56. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2015.150520.
PMID: 27012033BACKGROUNDLaRocco MT, Franek J, Leibach EK, Weissfeld AS, Kraft CS, Sautter RL, Baselski V, Rodahl D, Peterson EJ, Cornish NE. Effectiveness of Preanalytic Practices on Contamination and Diagnostic Accuracy of Urine Cultures: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016 Jan;29(1):105-47. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00030-15.
PMID: 26598386BACKGROUNDLifshitz E, Kramer L. Outpatient urine culture: does collection technique matter? Arch Intern Med. 2000 Sep 11;160(16):2537-40. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.16.2537.
PMID: 10979067BACKGROUNDMorimoto M, Yanai H, Shukuya K, Chiba H, Kobayashi K, Matsuno K. Effects of midstream collection and the menstrual cycle on urine particles and dipstick urinalysis among healthy females. Clin Chem. 2003 Jan;49(1):188-90. doi: 10.1373/49.1.188. No abstract available.
PMID: 12507982BACKGROUNDWorcester EM, Coe FL, Evan AP, Bergsland KJ, Parks JH, Willis LR, Clark DL, Gillen DL. Evidence for increased postprandial distal nephron calcium delivery in hypercalciuric stone-forming patients. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008 Nov;295(5):F1286-94. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.90404.2008. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
PMID: 18715937BACKGROUNDDesai RA, Assimos DG. Accuracy of urinary dipstick testing for pH manipulation therapy. J Endourol. 2008 Jun;22(6):1367-70. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0053.
PMID: 18578664BACKGROUND
Limitations and Caveats
Small number of study participants. Perhaps because we required participants to submit four fresh urine samples promptly throughout two separate days, 3 days apart, recruitment for the study was difficult. No nighttime urine collections. Further, we did not collect 24 hour urine samples simultaneously with the spot urines. One further limitation is that this looked at normal control patients only.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Vikas Bhatt
- Organization
- Albany Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adam Howe, MD
Albany Medical College
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 30, 2018
First Posted
August 24, 2018
Study Start
August 28, 2018
Primary Completion
May 20, 2019
Study Completion
May 20, 2019
Last Updated
February 21, 2021
Results First Posted
February 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share