NCT03644810

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the potential association between pain catastrophizing thoughts and the ability to dampen pain via endogenous descending inhibition. Half of the participants are persons with chronic low back pain and the other half are age and gender-matched controls

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2017

Completed
12 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 14, 2018

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 23, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 8, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

December 24, 2018

Status Verified

December 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

August 14, 2018

Last Update Submit

December 21, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Association between levels of pain catastrophizing thoughts and endogenous pain inhibition

    The pain catastrophizing scale score is correlated with the changes in Pressure Pain Thresholds before and after the cold pressor test See descriptions of each assessment method below (outcome 2 and outcome 3, respectively)

    One session (45 min)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Changes in pressure pain thresholds (determined with pressure algometry) before and after the cold pressor test

    30 minutes

  • Catastrophizing thoughts measured with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale

    15 minutes

Study Arms (2)

Chronic low back pain

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Individuals with chronic low back pain. Baseline assessment of pain intensity, function, pain duration and pain catastrophizing thoughts is performed Pain sensitivity at the back and lower leg is measured at baseline and immediately after performing the cold pressor test

Diagnostic Test: PPT measurementDiagnostic Test: Pain catastrophizing scaleProcedure: Cold Pressor Test

Healthy controls

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Healthy, pain-free individuals who are age and gender matched to the low back pain group fill out the pain catastrophizing scale Pain sensitivity at the back and lower leg is measured at baseline and immediately after performing the cold pressor test

Diagnostic Test: PPT measurementDiagnostic Test: Pain catastrophizing scaleProcedure: Cold Pressor Test

Interventions

PPT measurementDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The sensitivity to pressure which is gradually increased is assessed. The procedure is performed at the back and the lower leg

Also known as: Assessment of pain sensitivity
Chronic low back painHealthy controls

A validated questionnaire that measures three domains of pain-related catastrophizing thoughts: helplessness, rumination and excessive magnification

Chronic low back painHealthy controls

The participant submerges one hand into a tank of cold (5 deg C), circulating water. The procedure is commonly know to decrease the sensitivity to pressure (PPT procedure) so that a difference appears in pain sensitivity when comparing PPT values before and after the procedure

Chronic low back painHealthy controls

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Low back pain group:
  • chronic low back pain ( lasting more than 3 months)
  • intensity of ≥ 3/10 on a numeric rating scale
  • pain is located in the area between the gluteal folds below to the thoracolumbal junction above.
  • Controls:
  • No current or previous history of musculoskeletal pain of ongoing nature

You may not qualify if:

  • Applies for both groups:
  • Signs of radicular pain or other specific medical conditions e.g. rheumatologic disease or diabetes
  • Pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Spine Centre of Southern Denmark

Middelfart, Southern Denmark, 5500, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Edwards RR, Smith MT, Stonerock G, Haythornthwaite JA. Pain-related catastrophizing in healthy women is associated with greater temporal summation of and reduced habituation to thermal pain. Clin J Pain. 2006 Oct;22(8):730-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000210914.72794.bc.

    PMID: 16988570BACKGROUND
  • Vaegter HB, Palsson TS, Graven-Nielsen T. Facilitated Pronociceptive Pain Mechanisms in Radiating Back Pain Compared With Localized Back Pain. J Pain. 2017 Aug;18(8):973-983. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 24.

  • Meints SM, Wang V, Edwards RR. Sex and Race Differences in Pain Sensitization among Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. J Pain. 2018 Dec;19(12):1461-1470. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 17.

  • Mlekusch S, Neziri AY, Limacher A, Juni P, Arendt-Nielsen L, Curatolo M. Conditioned Pain Modulation in Patients With Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain. Clin J Pain. 2016 Feb;32(2):116-21. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000238.

  • Correa JB, Costa LO, de Oliveira NT, Sluka KA, Liebano RE. Central sensitization and changes in conditioned pain modulation in people with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a case-control study. Exp Brain Res. 2015 Aug;233(8):2391-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4309-6. Epub 2015 May 12.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Nociceptive Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Thorvaldur S Palsson, PhD

    Aalborg University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
The participants are blind to the study hypothesis and therefore the expected outcome of the tests performed
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study has a cross-sectional design and includes individuals (males and females) with and without chronic low back pain into two, equally large groups
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2018

First Posted

August 23, 2018

Study Start

May 1, 2017

Primary Completion

September 1, 2017

Study Completion

November 8, 2018

Last Updated

December 24, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There are currently no plans on sharing data from this study with other researchers

Locations