Narcotic Free TIVA and Incidence of Unacceptable Movements Under Anesthesia During ACDF Surgery
The Effect of a Narcotic Free Total Intravenous Anesthesia on the Outcome and Patient Safety During Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will help the investigators learn more about the best way to give anesthesia for these kinds of surgery. The investigators will be using 2 different groups of medications that is commonly used in ACDF surgery, one group has a Narcotic, and the other group does not. The investigators wish to test whether a narcotic free anesthetic will result in an overall safer surgery, better patient recovery, and satisfaction. The investigators think also that eliminating the Narcotic from the Anesthetic regimen will allow patients to recover faster after surgery , and consume less pain medicines in the postoperative period.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Jul 2018
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 5, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 15, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 23, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 5, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 5, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 18, 2023
CompletedSeptember 18, 2023
April 1, 2023
4 years
July 5, 2018
June 26, 2023
September 14, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of Unacceptable Movement Under General Anesthesia
Gross visible movement reported by the anesthesiologist or surgical team: bucking, chewing, or reaching to the endotracheal tube and induced by nociception, or head manipulation and positioning by the surgical or anesthesiology team or during a motor evoked potential stimulation.
duration of surgery
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Hemodynamic Stability
up to 24 hours
Time to Extubation
up to 24 hours
Quality of Recovery
24 hours post-op
Narcotic Consumption
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Remifentanil Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORRemifentanil infusion of 0.05 to 0.2 mcg/kg/minute started just prior to induction and stopped at emergence from anesthesia.
Ketamine and Dexmedetomidine group
ACTIVE COMPARATORdexmedetomidine bolus of 0.5 mcg/kg over 10 minutes starting 5 minutes prior to induction followed by an infusion of 0.2-0.7 mcg/kg/hour that will be stopped with the start of closing the surgical wound. Ketamine infusion of 2 mcg/kg/minute will be started at induction. It will be stopped at the beginning of the emergence from anesthesia, roughly 45 minutes from extubation.
Interventions
Remifentanil infusion of 0.05 to 0.2 mcg/kg/minute started just prior to induction and stopped at emergence from anesthesia.
Ketamine infusion of 2 mcg/kg/minute will be started at induction. It will be stopped at the beginning of the emergence from anesthesia, roughly 45 minutes from extubation.
dexmedetomidine bolus of 0.5 mcg/kg over 10 minutes starting 5 minutes prior to induction followed by an infusion of 0.2-0.7 mcg/kg/hour that will be stopped with the start of closing the surgical wound.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men and women 18- to 80-years old
- ASA 1, 2, 3
- or 2 levels ACDF
You may not qualify if:
- ASA 4
- Seizure disorders
- Chronic narcotic use
- Opiate abuse
- Major cardiac comorbidity, or significantly elevated blood pressure
- Known hypersensitivity to fentanyl analogs, ketamine, or propofol injectable emulsions.
- Known allergy to eggs, egg products, soybeans, or soy products
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Mohamed Abdeldayem
- Organization
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed Abdeldayem, MD
University of Arkansas
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2018
First Posted
August 23, 2018
Study Start
July 15, 2018
Primary Completion
July 5, 2022
Study Completion
July 5, 2022
Last Updated
September 18, 2023
Results First Posted
September 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04