Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine Loading for Dexmedetomidine Sedation During Elective Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia
Sedation
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study designed to compare the maternal and early neonatal effects of a loading dose of dexmedetomidine versus low-dose ketamine in parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either an intravenous loading dose of dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg) or intravenous ketamine (0.15 mg/kg) immediately after the establishment of spinal anesthesia. In both groups, sedation will be maintained with a continuous dexmedetomidine infusion at a rate of 0.5 μg/kg/h. The primary and secondary outcomes include maternal hemodynamic parameters, sedation levels, patient and surgeon satisfaction scores, neonatal Apgar scores, and perioperative adverse events.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jun 2021
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 5, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 30, 2026
CompletedJune 30, 2026
June 1, 2026
7 months
June 5, 2026
June 29, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ramsey sedation score
Sedation score was evaluated by Ramses Sedation Score (RSS). RSS score was as follow: Awake; agitated or restless or both =1 Awake; cooperative, oriented, and tranquil=2 Awake but responds to commands only=3 Asleep; brisk response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus=4 Asleep; sluggish response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus=5 Asleep; no response to glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus=6
1)immediately before spinal anesthesia (SA) 2)5 minutes after SA, 3)immediately after the loading dose was completed, 4)immediately before surgical incision, 5)5 minutes after surgical incision, 6)5 minutes after the surgical closure.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
hemodynamic parameters
In the operating room; from immediately before the induction of anesthesia to transferring to ward with 5 minutes intervals
patient and surgeon satisfaction scores
at day 1 postoperatively.
APGAR score
The Apgar score is assessed at 1 minute and 5 minutes after birth.
Study Arms (2)
Dexmedetomidine Loading Group (Group D)
EXPERIMENTALPatients received intravenous dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg over 10 minutes as a loading dose immediately after spinal anesthesia.
Ketamine Loading Group (Group K)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients received intravenous ketamine 0.15 mg/kg over 10 minutes as a loading dose immediately after spinal anesthesia.
Interventions
Maintenance sedation was achieved with dexmedetomidine infusion at 0.5 μg/kg/h after dexmedetomidine loading.
Patients received intravenous ketamine 0.15 mg/kg over 10 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification status I patients
- aged \>18 years scheduled for cesarean/section surgery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled to the study
You may not qualify if:
- known sensitivity or allergy to study drugs
- a history of analgesic or narcotic abuse
- any contraindications for spinal anesthesia
- emergency cesarean/section
- existing of fetal distress.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sultangazi Haseki Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Sultangazi, 34265, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Zhao ZY, Gan JH, Liu JB, Cheng Q. Clinical evaluation of combination of dexmedetomidine and midazolam vs. dexmedetomidine alone for sedation during spinal anesthesia. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2017 Dec;24(8):1758-1762. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
PMID: 29551918BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Halil C Canatan
Ozel Duygu Hastanesi
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 5, 2026
First Posted
June 30, 2026
Study Start
June 1, 2021
Primary Completion
December 31, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
June 30, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Beginning 1 months and ending 36 months following article publication.
- Access Criteria
- Proposals should be directed to drsinanuzman@yahoo.com
All collected IPD