Interscalene Versus Combined Infraclavicular-suprascapular Nerve Blocks
The Analgesic Efficacy and Hemi-diaphragmatic Paralysis Assessment of Combined Infraclavicular-suprascapular Nerve Blocks Versus Standard Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this trial is to compare the analgesic efficiency and hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis of the standard ultrasound-guided interscalene (ISB) brachial plexus block with the combined use of costoclavicular approach of infraclavicular brachial plexus block and suprascapular nerve block (ICB-SSB) for patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Authors hypothesize that the combined use of ICB-SSB could lead to equivalent postoperative analgesic effect to the standard ISB with less hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Sep 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 21, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 14, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2020
CompletedMarch 16, 2022
March 1, 2022
2 years
July 21, 2018
March 15, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The cumulative morphine consumption at first 24 hours postoperatively.
in milligram
24 hours after recovery from general anesthesia
Secondary Outcomes (38)
Assessment of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis
5 minutes before intervention
Assessment of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis
5 minutes after intervention
Assessment of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis by abdominal ultrasound examination
10 minutes after recovery from general anesthesia
Assessment of postoperative pain
1 hour after recovery from general anesthesia
Assessment of postoperative pain
4 hours after recovery from general anesthesia
- +33 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ICSSB group
ACTIVE COMPARATORinfraclavicular suprascapular nerve block administered group
ISB group
ACTIVE COMPARATORinterscalene nerve block administered group
Interventions
At supine position with abducted limb, the probe of ultrasound will be translocated in costoclavicular space; the subclavian artery will be identified. The three cords of the brachial plexus will be visualized lateral to the artery. By using an in-plane technique and a cephalad-to-caudate direction, the block needle will be advanced until its tip will be in the middle of three cords and 10 mL of 0.25 % bupivacaine Hydrochloride will be injected. Then at lateral decubitus position, by using in-plane technique the probe will be translocated in suprascapular fossa, lateral-to-medial direction, the block needle will be advanced until its tip in the floor of the suprascapular fossa ventral to the fascia of the supraspinatus muscle and 10 mL of 0.25 % bupivacaine Hydrochloride will be injected .
The probe of ultrasound will be applied in lateral side of the neck at the level of the cricoid cartilage to obtain a view of the three hypoechoic structures which represent the roots of the brachial plexus. Using an in-plane technique and a lateral to-medial direction, the block needle will be advanced until its tip will be positioned under the prevertebral fascia between the two most superficial hypoechoic structures and 10 mL of 0.25 % bupivacaine Hydrochloride will be injected at level of C5-6 and another 10 ml of 0.25 % bupivacaine Hydrochloride will be injected at level of C7-8.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society association (ASA) physical status I to III patients who will be scheduled for an elective arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal
- preexisting (obstructive or restrictive) pulmonary disease or low baseline oxygen saturation
- contraindication to regional anesthesia (coagulopathy, allergy to local anesthetic, sever thrombocytopenia, pre-existing neuropathy in operative limb, infection at puncture site).
- sepsis
- hepatic or renal dysfunction.
- Advanced cardiovascular diseases
- chronic pain condition requiring the intake of opioids at home.
- prior surgery in the neck or infraclavicular/suprascapular fossa.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fayoum University hospital
El Fayoum Qesm, Faiyum Governorate, 63514, Egypt
Related Publications (5)
Ullah H, Samad K, Khan FA. Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block versus parenteral analgesia for postoperative pain relief after major shoulder surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 4;2014(2):CD007080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007080.pub2.
PMID: 24492959BACKGROUNDUrmey WF, Talts KH, Sharrock NE. One hundred percent incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis associated with interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia as diagnosed by ultrasonography. Anesth Analg. 1991 Apr;72(4):498-503. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199104000-00014.
PMID: 2006740BACKGROUNDAliste J, Bravo D, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. A randomized comparison between interscalene and combined infraclavicular-suprascapular blocks for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2018 Mar;65(3):280-287. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-1048-0. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
PMID: 29270914BACKGROUNDTran DQ, Elgueta MF, Aliste J, Finlayson RJ. Diaphragm-Sparing Nerve Blocks for Shoulder Surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):32-38. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000529.
PMID: 27941477BACKGROUNDKarmakar MK, Sala-Blanch X, Songthamwat B, Tsui BC. Benefits of the costoclavicular space for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: description of a costoclavicular approach. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 May-Jun;40(3):287-8. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000232. No abstract available.
PMID: 25899958BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Safaa G Ragab, MD
Faculty of medicine, Fayoum university
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mohamed M Arafa, MD
Faculty of medicine, Fayoum university
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 21, 2018
First Posted
August 14, 2018
Study Start
September 1, 2018
Primary Completion
August 31, 2020
Study Completion
September 30, 2020
Last Updated
March 16, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share