Evaluating the Analgesic Efficacy of Combined Individual Nerve Block in Comparison to Interscalene Nerve Block
1 other identifier
interventional
128
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients undergoing total shoulder arthroscopic adhesiolysis may experience severe postoperative pain. Inadequate pain management can result in unfavourable hospital outcomes and the development of persistent neuropathic manifestation the aim of the study is to compare both ultrasound techniques (combined individual nerve block to interscalene nerve block) as regards the postoperative analgesic effect and shoulder range of movement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Jan 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 7, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 14, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2021
CompletedFebruary 14, 2022
February 1, 2022
10 months
January 7, 2021
February 11, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the duration of postoperative analgesia
postoperative pain by visual analogue scale (VAS) a 10 point scale where 1 means no pain and 10 means worst pain ever
24 hours postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (1)
range of motion of the operated shoulder
24 hours postoperative
Study Arms (2)
group A: receive ultrasound-guided interscalene block
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patient will be put in the supine position, with the arm adducted a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe is oriented transversely across the lateral neck. When visualizing the ''stoplight sign,''15 to 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine consistent with the overall local anaesthetic dosing of less than 2.5 mg/kg. will be injected with low pressures to avoid intraneural injection.
group B: receive ultrasound-guided selective nerve block
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patient will be put in the sitting position, a linear 38-mm high frequency 10-12 MHz transducer will be placed first on the scapula to obtain a view of the suprascapular nerve a 22 G, 8 cm needle will be advanced in-plane and a total of 5-8 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected then the arm adducted the linear probe will be placed at the junction of the pectoralis major muscle and the biceps muscle such that the axillary artery will be visualized in cross-section The probe will be moved towards the biceps muscle (laterally) until the musculocutaneous nerve is visualized and8 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected
Interventions
The patient will be put in the supine position, with the arm adducted a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe is oriented transversely across the lateral neck. When visualizing the ''stoplight sign,''15 to 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected
the patient will be put in the sitting position, linear 38-mm high frequency 10-12 MHz transducer will be placed first on the scapula to view of the suprascapular nerve. 5-8 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected to block the SSN. The ultrasound probe put on the posterior aspect of the shoulder to view the circumflex artery, 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine this will lead to loss of sensation over the deltoid.lateral pectoral nerve block (LPNB) will be done by injecting a volume of 8 ml of a 0.25% bupivacaine The probe will be moved towards the biceps muscle until the musculocutaneous nerve is seen and 8 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected.
bupivacaine
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA I, II
- scheduled for arthroscopic assisted adhesiolysis
You may not qualify if:
- restrictive lung disease,
- refusal of the procedure,
- coagulopathy,
- allergy to any of the used medications
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ain Shams University
Cairo, 69711, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Fathy M Tash, MD
Ain Shams University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor of Anaesthesia
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 7, 2021
First Posted
January 14, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
October 30, 2021
Study Completion
October 30, 2021
Last Updated
February 14, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02